solved Part 1 In a few short paragraphs or less, share

Part 1
In a few short paragraphs or less, share your thoughts on this week’s reading. You could share a new insight, likes, dislikes, disagreements with the author, etc. This should NOT be a synopsis of the reading. You must also post a comment/reply on a classmate’s post. this should be on chapter 18 of Information systems Version 8 By John Gallaugher 2020 (must have this exact book)
Part 2
Review this weeks headlines for stores related to IT and choose one. Look for stories that you find interesting or have strong feelings about. must be a recent article and IT related. please make is simple easy to and clear to understand Post a link to your story and brief description of the article and why you believe it’s a good ITSoW here. please use this article https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/31/style/anonymity…( 1 short paragraph is enough )
Part 3
Consider Google’s influence on society, understanding, education, and perception. When Google delivers the majority of search results and most users default first to Google’s products, do you feel that gives a single firm too much power?  Do you think governments have a role in regulating a firm with this amount of influence? Why or why not?)(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)

Part 4
Consider your search habits on mobile devices vs. desktop computers. Are there certain product categories that you used to go to Google for, but where you’ll now rely on an app? How do you suppose this impacts Google’s revenue? If you were Google, how might you combat challenges as search shifts from a single search engine to niche apps?(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)
Part 5
Google’s unofficial motto is “Don’t be evil.” But sometimes it’s challenging for managers to tell what path is “most right” or “least wrong.” Google operates in countries that require the firm to screen and censor results. Short term, this is clearly a limitation on freedom of speech. But long term, access to the Internet could catalyze economic development and spread information in a way that leads to more democratization. Investigate, consider, and argue the case for either limiting development in speech-limiting countries or working within them as a potential agent of change. What other pressures is a publicly-traded firm under to choose one path or the other? Which path would you choose and why?(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)