solved To use critical thinking skills to apply course concepts to

To use critical thinking skills to apply course concepts to a scenario involving circumstances governed by Miranda v. Arizona (1966).
Instructions

Reply to the topic below. Then, reply to 2 classmates.
Your initial post should be at least 150 words in length. 
Proper grammar, punctuation, and APA citation are required.
Discuss your answers in a well-developed reply. See the rubric for clarification of expectations.
You will see your classmates’ responses only after you have submitted your initial reply.
Click “Reply” below to begin.

Your initial post is due by Thursday 11:59 pm before the assignment deadline.
Two replies are due by due date.
Discussion Board Prompt: 
Complete the following steps:

Review the online learning content and your textbook readings. You will want to conduct outside research as well, drawing on academic sources to support your points. 

You be the judge! Using the knowledge you have gained from this module’s content and textbooks readings, write an analysis of the legal issues surrounding the police conduct and make sure it is relative to the admissibility of the following confession(s). You may also research outside of the provided materials and are encouraged to do so. Cite your work and explain your reasoning as if this were a real court issue. Support your analysis with academic sources and case law.  Be sure to also address the following question: What is the potential outcome from the suppression hearing? Give at least two examples of evidence in this case.
John and Jimmy Jones were suspected of a armed robbery of a liquor store on Fifth Avenue during which the owner was shot and killed. They were brought into the police station in separate cars. Officer Smith informed John Jones of his Miranda rights on the way to the police station. John told the officer he was not sure if he wanted to say anything.
Jimmy Jones was not informed of his Miranda rights by the transport officer, Officer Banks.  Banks and Jimmy talked about several things in the car on the way to the station. Banks did not ask Jimmy any questions during this conversation, but tried to keep the conversation friendly. During the ride to the station, Jimmy blurted out, “We didn’t mean to hurt anybody.” Officer Banks did not probe further, but recorded the information in a police report later.
Upon arrival at the police station, the Jones brothers were placed in separate rooms.
Jimmy was left in an interview room and later invoked his rights with Detective Fitzpatrick. 
Officer Smith sat in the room with John and said nothing to him. After 20 minutes, Detective Fitzpatrick opened the door to the interrogation room and said to Officer Smith, “Jimmy told me everything,” which was a lie, and then left. Officer Smith turned to Jimmy and said, “We do not need anything from you now. Talk to me if you want because we got the goods on you. It sounds like your brother put the whole thing on you.” John gave a full confession. A motion to suppress was brought in court by his attorney.