solved Part 1:Â Briefly define the role of the virtuoso in

Part 1: 
Briefly define the role of the virtuoso in the 19th century. Who were some of the major virtuosos during this time and how did people talk about them? How does the role of the virtuoso become more complicated for women during this time?
Briefly define the musical canon. How does the canon mark a shift away from previous listening and compositional practices? How did composers respond to this change?
This section should take you around 150-200 words to answer.
This will due on Thursday(8/13) 8:00pm PST
Part 2:
This section will be for starting to think about the paper outline that is due this Sunday (8/15) at 8:00pm. 
Pick the two works (that include the piano) that you would like to talk about in your paper and the issue on which you would like to focus. Briefly define the issue and briefly introduce the two pieces (who wrote them, who was the intended audience, when/where would this piece have been performed, what issue are you choosing, etc.). Then discuss how these pieces relate to your chosen issue. For example, you could consider the following questions: How does this issue affect the ways in which the pieces were written and/or performed? What do these pieces tell us about the prominence or importance of these issues? Remember that the prompt asks you to compare the two pieces, so you’ll want to think about whether this issue affects your chosen pieces similarly and/or differently. Finally, you will need to draft a thesis statement. Remember that a thesis statement should be specific and should include the issue you’re discussing, the pieces you’re discussing, and how you plan on relating the issue and the pieces. Your thesis statement may be one or two sentences. 
This section should take around 200-250 words to complete. Your actual outline will need to draw out these issues much further, though.
For this forum you will need to provide feedback on one (1) of your classmates’ theses. You should provide constructive feedback based on the information they’ve provided in their post. Feedback that is something like “I agree” or “be more specific” will not be counted for credit (this is vague and not helpful for your peers). Feedback that is not worded constructively (e.g. using personal attacks) will also not receive credit. Please try to spread feedback evenly amongst your peers, so if you notice that one post has several responses, please choose another one (this will be more helpful for your peers). Feedback does not need to be more than a sentence or two.
If you are not sure about how to give feedback consider the following: How can the thesis be more specific (and what specifically could be added, clarified, or shortened)? Are they missing a piece of information (like which pieces they’ll talk about)? Do you know what conclusion they are planning to make (if not, what makes you unsure of their conclusions? What could be added/clarified)? Do their conclusions seem to make sense with the information given in their post? Is there another conclusion they might consider while they plan their outline? Is there another point you think would be important to make in their paper? You are welcome to consider other areas of feedback as well.
And also you will need to write an outline of this paper