solved For this second step of your final project, you will

For this second step of your final project, you will prepare an original critique of your assigned study in the form of a short paper (see below). In the paper, you will need to address the major flaws of the study using appropriate epidemiology terms. Again, this step will be submitted individually but discussed as a group. In the critique, consider the study design, study population, recruitment of subjects, what kind of measures were taken, what kind of confounders and extraneous variables were controlled for, and what outcome measures were collected. You do not need to identify specific types of biases, or engage in any detailed number-crunching at this stage. Rather, you should consider broadly how the general study design, sampling strategy, data analysis, and/or approach to measuring exposures and outcomes could lead to incorrect inferences about the causal relationships under study. Once again, while you should develop information and ideas for your critique through discussion with your group, each member of the group needs to submit their own answers to receive credit for this step.Final Project Step 2 Length: Approximately 500 words (No fewer than 400; not more than 1,000)General Formatting(here and going forward): There are no strict rules on margins, fonts, or citation style;but I offer the following guidelines:❖Font:•11-point;Times New Roman, Arial, or, my new favorite, Arial Nova❖Margins:•1-inch square❖Citations:I suggest you use AMA reference style, as illustrated by the Journal of the American Medical Association.The relevant information can be found in the “References”section of JAMA’s instructions for authors page(see below).For our purposes, these are the most important guidelines, withmy slight modifications to the original JAMA language shown in brackets:“Number references in the order they appear in the text; do not alphabetize.In text, tables, and legends, identify references with superscript Arabicnumerals[orArabicnumerals within parentheses,placedimmediately followingthe relevant sentence. Do not use author names for in-text citations]. When listing references, follow AMA style and abbreviate names of journals according to the journals list in PubMed. List all authors and/or editors up to 6; if more than 6, list the first 3 followed by “et al.””“Examples of reference style:1.Youngster I, Russell GH, Pindar C, Ziv-Baran T, Sauk J, Hohmann EL. Oral, capsulized, frozen fecal microbiota transplantation for relapsing Clostridium difficileinfection. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1772-1778.2.Murray CJL. Maximizing antiretroviral therapy in developing countries: the dual challenge ofefficiency and quality [published online December 1, 2014]. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.163763.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS proposals to implement certain disclosure provisions of the Affordable Care Act. http://www.cms.gov/apps/media/press/factsheet.asp?Counter=4221. Accessed January 30, 2012.4.McPhee SJ, Winker MA, Rabow MW, Pantilat SZ, Markowitz AJ, eds. Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical; 2011“https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/instru…-for-authorsI’m not overlyconcerned with the exact formatting of the citations, as long as they are complete, and the relevant information can be easily found. What I docare about is that you use Arabic numbers (standard or superscript is fine), not authornames, when citing references within the text of your paper (see above).