solved Part I: Primary source analysisWrite a brief source analysis for

Part I: Primary source analysisWrite a brief source analysis for each of the following two primary sources. Each analysis should be 250 words.A good analysis will make a clear historical claim (thesis), will use the primary source as evidence for that claim, and properly contextualize the source. Make sure that you get the context right: which year? what else is happening? how does it fit into the larger story.When writing your essay, keep in mind the model of the “6 C’s of primary source analysis”:Content (what is the text about, what are the main ideas?)Citation (who is the author?)Context (what else is going on at the time that is relevant for your understanding of the primary source?)Connection (prior knowledge: link the source to other things you know and connect this source to the broader historical narrative about the Holocaust)Communication (what is the point of view of the author of this source? What seems to be the agenda or goal behind it? who is the intended audience?)Conclusions (what does this primary source contribute to your understanding of the history of the Holocaust, what is its significance?)1“… I was given the command to send twenty-odd thousand Jews out from the ghetto; if not—‘We will do it.’ And the question arose: ‘Should we take it over and do it ourselves, or leave it for others to carry out?’ But being dominated not by the thought ‘How many will be lost,’ but by the thought ‘How many will be saved,’ we … came to the conclusion that as difficult as this will be for us, we must take into our own hands the carrying out of the decree. … I must cut off limbs in order to save the body! I must take the children because, if not, others could also, God forbid, be taken.”2“The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored, because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flush with victory and stung with injury stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captive enemies to the judgment of the law is one of the most significant tributes that Power has even paid to Reason. …The most savage and numerous crimes planned and committed by the Nazis were those against the Jews. … It is my purpose to show a plan and design, to which all Nazis were fanatically committed, to annihilate the Jewish people. …Extermination of the Jews enabled the Nazis to bring a practiced hand to similar measures against Poles, Serbs, and Greeks. The plight of the Jews was a constant threat to opposition or discontent among other elements of Europe’s population: pacifists, conservatives, Communists, Catholics, Protestants, Socialists. …”Part II: EssayWrite a four-paragraph essay addressing the topic below (introduction; two paragraphs developing your idea and discussing specific evidence; conclusion). Refer to your lecture notes, readings, and textbook for context and specific examples in order to develop an historical argument. The essay must have a clear thesis statement, and you need to develop your thesis based on specific historical evidence drawn from the material discussed in this class. The essay will be about 500 words. To receive full credit, your essay needs to be driven by a clear argument and needs to provide clear evidence that you are drawing on course lectures and readings. Do not rely on other sources drawn from the internet. The Holocaust unfolded in different ways in different European countries. Discuss two countries as examples to show two different patterns of how European nations responded to the Nazi genocide. How did each of these countries deal with its Jewish population during the Holocaust? What different patterns of responding to the Holocaust do they reflect? What do you think explains these differences?