solved Week 7ReplyLeadership in Healthcare APA Style ReplyYou have had a

Week 7ReplyLeadership in Healthcare APA Style ReplyYou have had a successful year as a leader at Sunrise General Hospital. You are now tasked with evaluating your team’s effectiveness. Develop a post in which you discuss how to evaluate your team. Reply to each Peer about their post.You have had a successful year as a leader at Sunrise General Hospital. You are now tasked with evaluating your team’s effectiveness. Develop a post in which you discuss how to evaluate your team. Reply to Martina:For this week’s discussion, we evaluate team evaluation, effectiveness, and values. By evaluating these factors, leaders in organizations can improve and strengthen areas for achievement. An effective and strong team helps an organization achieve and provide quality service. Also, an effective team achieves the most success when they work well together. So assessment in these areas allows leaders to work well with others while creating innovative ways to improve. If I were the Sunrise General Hospital leader, I would evaluate a team’s effectiveness in different areas. Two components that I would first take into consideration are the team’s structure and activities. A team’s structure evaluates the team size and whether or not it serves its organizational purpose. The structure is important because “there is no ideal team size because every team has a different purpose, and this purpose dictates the number of members needed to make the team function well” (Dye, 2017, p.4). Also, assessing a team’s hierarchy and membership is important when evaluating structure. Hierarchy refers to those who hold certain positions and ensuring team member’s titles are appropriate and respected. As a leader, a question I would evaluate is, “Are the teams recognizing and respecting hierarchy among members?” Membership looks at whether the teams invite others to participate. As a leader, a question I would evaluate is, “How is membership looked at from the team’s perspective?” Besides, I would assess team activities along with team values. Team activities may include decision-making, team meetings, and team protocols. Reassessing team activities allows a leader to see if they effectively allow a team to be proficient. Evaluating these two components allows leaders to improve teamwork and collaboration. Otherwise, if some things were not working out, these assessments can be useful in identifying those factors that need improvement. Defining success can be difficult. As a leader, I think knowing success is when your team/organization has met its goals. Although management and team-building should always remain consistent, meeting goals can be measured with success. On the other hand, I think frequent meetings and evaluations with the team would be effective in addressing areas of improvement. Team involvement is encouraged by meeting with the team regularly, allowing the team to feel valued for their opinion. Overall, addressing these traits/aspects within this culture encourages high-performance while providing quality care in healthcare. ReferencesDye, C. F. (2017). Leadership in healthcare: Essential values and skills (3rd ed.). Health Services Administration Press.You have had a successful year as a leader at Sunrise General Hospital. You are now tasked with evaluating your team’s effectiveness. Develop a post in which you discuss how to evaluate your team. Reply to Paolo: This week’s discussion emphasizes the importance of evaluating team effectiveness. There are several mechanisms and methodologies on how leaders can evaluate their team’s performance and success. However, an effective evaluation is one that is data-driven and competency-based. This type of evaluation process will allow the leader to quantify team strengths and deficiencies and establish a measurable goals for improvement, if necessary. Nonetheless, Dye (2017) provided three essential elements when evaluating team effectiveness: team structure, team activities, and establishing team protocols. These elements are necessary in monitoring and assessing the team’s effectiveness to ensure that the configuration and behaviors of the team still function in the organization’s favor (Dye, 2017).For instance, after a successful year as a leader at Sunrise General Hospital, one way of evaluating the team’s effectiveness is to identify a prioritized risk was addressed. Prioritized risks can be found in the organization’s quality assessment and performance improvement plan or in the strategic plan. Since the leader oversees the emergency department, one such prioritized risk is the amount of waiting time in the emergency room. This prioritized risk not only impacts patient outcomes but also patient satisfaction. Therefore, evaluating the team’s performance or effectiveness in addressing this area is crucial. Furthermore, ER wait times are quantifiable data and can be compared to national or state averages. These national and state averages are considered benchmarks which the team can be scored against. A successful team result can be determined if the ER wait times of Sunrise General Hospital is at par or better than national and state averages. These means the ER department have adequate staff, infrastructure, and organization to provide the services to its patients. However, evaluating the team’s performance against established parameters is only part of an effective evaluation. The leader must also evaluate the team’s members and get their feedback and address their concerns, if any. This way, the team’s values and culture are preserved or enhanced to better equip the team to perform their activities. An example of this is exemplified by The Joint Commission (2018) is its’ culture of safety assessment requirement. This evaluation can be done through a survey type of evaluation. Lastly, the overall process must be conducted by a team representing the services of the department, and not only one person. For areas where requirements for improvement are necessary, vital steps are to be taken to address and correct the deficiencies identified through collaboration with the team. Emphasis is to be given in correcting the root cause of the deficiency while ensuring that a mechanism is in place to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective action plan and continuous compliance.References:Dye, C. F. (2017). Leadership in healthcare: Essential values and skills (3rd ed.). Health Administration.The Joint Commission. (2018). Safety culture assessment: Improving the survey process. The Joint Commission Perspectives. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/accred-and-cert/safety_culture_assessment_improving_the_survey_process.pdf