solved I’m working on a management report and need support to

I’m working on a management report and need support to help me learn.Seeking
for research paper/essay writing assistance. There are 5 open questions
around Governance, Risk and Compliance that would need to be addressed
in consideration of the below requirements:1. The assignment requires regulatory and compliance expertise from an excellent English speaker.2.
Answers should be made under US legislation (possibly New York) with
some comparisons with the EU legislation. Field of choice: IT.2. Please collate the assignment as a single document in a Microsoft Word format. 3. All marking is anonymous, which means your name should not appear on your work. 4. All work should be properly referenced. 
5.
The total word count for this assignment should be no less than 3,300
(approx 12 pages). This includes all in-text references and appendices
but excludes any footnotes, reference page or contents page. N.B.
Appendices should only be used in exceptional circumstances and should
consist of only brief extracts or tables. 
6. The number of words per part of the question should be in proportion to the number of marks allocated. 
7. Please see below the questions – appreciate your efforts!Delivery Date of order : 11-Jun-2021Q1 Explain
why internationally agreed standards of regulation are important,
highlighting the benefits from having these in place at both an
international and jurisdictional level. Support your answer with
relevant examples. DRAFTING NOTES: Focus is on the different
roles of internal stakeholders involved in supporting effective GRC
practices within regulated firms and this could include those such as
the board, the compliance function, risk management operations, for
example. However, irrespective of the selections made it is how the
writer support their selection (through consideration of relevant
responsibilities, resulting activities and so on) and provide examples
in doing so that will effectively demonstrate knowledge and
understanding. Examples should therefore be apparent, ideally one for
each of the stakeholders referred to, to illustrate how the activities
of each contributes to the effectiveness of the approach overall. Types
of topics that could be covered here include supporting effective
culture, policies, systems, controls, training, education and so on,
with, examiners assessing efficacy in how well these support their
intended purpose and explanation provided.Q2 Identify
two regulatory directives or initiatives that have been implemented, or
are in the process of being implemented, in a jurisdiction and sector
of your choice. Consider the implementation process and show, through
the use of practical examples, how this has impacted or has the
potential to impact upon your chosen jurisdiction and sector, and on a
particular regulated firm within that jurisdiction/sector. DRAFTING
NOTES: the goal is to demonstrate the relevance of the chosen bodies
activities for the overall regulatory environment and also for a
particular jurisdiction, so examiners would expect to see consideration
of this in respect of topics such as international/local standards,
jurisdiction/sector aims and objectives, global initiatives/focus, and
such like, with practical examples provided in support of the commentary
included. Q3 Describe the assessment
made by the regulator of a sector and jurisdiction of your choice prior
to a firm being authorised by them. Within this, explain the purpose and
methodology of this assessment, make clear the relevance of this for
the firm and provide examples to illustrate the approach adopted. DRAFTING
NOTES: The writer shall select an example of failure in corporate
governance in a regulated firm that has occurred within the last five
years. Unfortunately, there are many of these to choose from (a number
of which are referred to throughout the earlier Units of the course
text). Having selected such an example, an effective answer should
briefly describe what happened (with an emphasis required here on a
description, rather than more generally writing about, together with
relative brevity) then assess the consequences for the firm involved (so
there should be some form of assessment apparent). The writer should
provide their views, therefore views should be apparent, on the lessons
that could be learned from that failure – this is the focus of the
latter part of the question. Focus here is to demonstrate practical
understanding of corporate governance and its relevanceQ4 Thomas
is a member of the compliance function team at a firm regulated in a
jurisdiction and sector of your choice. He has been asked by his line
manager, the head of regulatory compliance, to contribute to an upcoming
training day for new members of the team by preparing a paper to act as
the basis of part of the training. In this, he has been asked to
demonstrate why and how a wide range of matters – such as an economic
downturn, the emergence of scandals, or other such significant events –
have the potential to influence the development of regulation in that
jurisdiction, and to explain the relevance of this development for firms
regulated within that jurisdiction and sector. With reference to the above scenario and to the fundamental objectives of regulation: discuss
why and how matters such as an economic downturn, the emergence of
scandals, or other significant events have the potential to influence
the development of regulation in your chosen jurisdiction and sector,
and highlight and recommend the most important messages you, as a
compliance professional, would want to ensure were communicated to new
staff members attending a training day (such as that referred to in the
scenario), supporting your views with reasoning and examples. DRAFTING
NOTES: This question draws on topics referred to across the earlier
units of the course text. Regulatory focus, themes, supervision
requirements, fit and properness test, and wider topics such as
reputation are all possible considerations in answering this question,
which references the information provided by fines to act as a backdrop
to assessing the writer’s understanding of why the regulator’s focus is
of importance to regulated firms. In a satisfactory answer, the writer
should identify one of the themes evident from recent fines issued by a
regulator of a sector of their choice, selecting appropriate examples to
illustrate their views. Themes such as focus on individuals, honesty
and integrity, system and control failings, size of fines, etc. are
examples of what might be apparent but here it is again not so much the
theme that the candidate highlights but how they have supported their
comments on this through their selection of examples to illustrate their
views that is most important. Specifically, the writer need to discuss
(i.e. there should be inclusion of the facts and some interpretation
from different sides of the argument, with the aim of arriving at a
conclusion, rather than just writing generally around the subject
matter) and make clear what can be inferred from these themes about the
current and intended focus of the regulator (this is an opportunity for
the candidate to demonstrate their knowledge about the current and
intended focus and the way in which the regulator is prioritising action
in these areas), then explain (so an explanation should be apparent,
again rather than just writing about) the relevance of this theme to a
firm authorised by that regulator (for example covering topics such as
prioritisation of issues, hot topics, areas of focus within the firm,
etc., as appropriate re the nature of that firm and its
products/services)Q.5 The transparency and accountability of the regulator is crucial to the effectiveness of the regulatory system. With
reference to the chosen jurisdiction, regulated sector of IT and to the
above statement, evaluate the responsibilities of the regulator(s),
showing how the regulator’s transparency and accountability is ensured
and demonstrating the relevance of this for the effectiveness of the
regulatory system overall. You should include examples to support the
points made. DRAFTING NOTES: This question provides the writer
with an open opportunity to demonstrate their thinking around a topic of
practical relevance, consideration of which is inherent within the
field. Reasonable responses will demonstrate consideration of the
various factors that contribute to the statement and discuss these (i.e.
there should be inclusion of the facts and their interpretation from
different sides of the argument, with the aim of arriving at a
conclusion) however the broad nature of the question phrasing gives
scope for the writer to be open in their approach and, in so doing,
provides more able individuals with the opportunity to really
demonstrate depth of practical understanding around the issues at hand.
In an effective answer, the question posed in the statement will have
been addressed – essentially this should form the backdrop to the
discussion. There should be some form of evaluation of the impact of the
different approaches in the context of its impact on GRC activities,
which requires the writer to consider the impact of working in an
environment/within a culture of just meeting minimum requirements (for
example with a focus on box ticking, doing the minimum possible, etc.)
compared to working in one in which all act in an ethical way more
generally (i.e. where meeting expectations re compliance is part of
normal day-to-day business practice). Each of these opposing types of
business culture would have a definite practical impact in terms of how
the firm and those within it viewed compliance and related activity,
with obvious consequences for many, including the compliance function
and how they approach their role. In short, numerous topics for the
writer to choose from in their discussion, with examiners expecting to
see addressing of the different elements and assessing predominantly on
how effectively the writer have utilised their choice of topics to
address the main focus of the question. The writer should include
examples that relate to the chosen topics and their discussions around
them. Real life examples would be useful, whilst illustrative examples
are of course acceptable.Regardingsources/references: please use at least 10 sources includingthe International Compliance Association (ICA) online materials togetherwith academic books and other relevant materials. N.B. Plagiarism freeis a MUST. Screens will be made using Turnitin detection software thatchecks for passages found elsewhere on the Internet, in books andjournals, or in work previously submitted. All citations must be inlight of the Blueprint citation ed 19th and or more updated.