I don’t understand this Social Science question and need help to study.

The essay is expected to be 1 1/2 pages, double spaced using 12-point font, appropriate APA style, and citation with a bibliography (which is separate). 1inch margins sides, top, and bottom. You were expected to paraphrase in your words what you have derived from the readings.Notes – citations only from readings. No plagiarism. Easy vocabulary. The bibliography is separate, should have its own page. No summary of readings. Integration of personal experiences, how it impacts you, any thoughts, compare and contrast (IF APPLICABLE), focus on theories.I will be attaching the textbook(s) as a pdf.Schamess, G., Shilkret, R. (2021). Chapter 3: Ego Psychology. In J. Berzoff, L.M. Flannigan, & P. Hertz. Inside out and outside in (5th Ed.). UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Tummala-Narra, P. (2016). Psychoanalytic theory and cultural competence in psychotherapy (Chapter 1 & 2,). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.One of the textbooks, I will be including people’s responses because I do not have the textbook as of yet.

Purpose of this Document: To let you know in advance what the specific BTN requirements are for the entire class. These requirements are from another edition of your textbook at the end of selected chapters. For example, BTN 14-4 is located at the end of chapter 14. Be sure to read the chapter before completing and apply this knowledge in your thread and reply. You may submit your threads in advance of the due dates. BTN stands for “Beyond the Numbers”. Basic Requirement for each BTN: The student will be required to write a substantive written thread (between 125–150 words minimum) to these discussion questions. Create your initial posts in MS Word. Feel free to use your book and Internet as sources. One (1) or two (2) sentence replies will not be graded. BTN 21-5: Access iSixSigma’s Website (iSixSigma.com) to search for and read information about benchmarking to complete the following requirements. (Hint: Look in the “dictionary” link.) Required: Write a one-paragraph explanation (in layperson’s terms) of benchmarking. How does standard costing relate to benchmarking?

The first paper is critique of Mission, Vision, Values and Goal statements of a healthcare organization and is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time) of the current week. This assignment is worth 100 points.Please visit the strategic plan website of a healthcare organization. Some examples would include a hospital, outpatient clinic, assisted living facility, public health department or MD office. Next, choose an organization and verify that it has the Mission, Vision, Values and Goals or Objectives. Then, get the approval of your instructor to use the site for your assignment. After reviewing the strategic components, write a 3-5-pages paper, evaluating each section of the strategic planning components based upon your readings. Also, make sure you support your critique of the strategic components with specific examples. The below videos along with your readings and the lecture materials can be used to support your findings:Vision Statement:How to Write a Vision Statement – VideoMission Statement:How to Write a Mission Statement – VideoGoals and Objectives:How to set SMART Goals – Video

When you find someone who sparks your interest, click on the link next to their picture to read the article or to watch the video about them.  For this assignment, select a different person than you chose in STEM Spotlight 1.

Initial Post:

Write a one-page reflection (250 words, Double-spaced, 12-point font) answering the following prompts: 

Name of the person you selected
Why you chose this person.
What could you relate to in their story and/or what was different from you?  What was interesting?
What is your biggest takeaway from learning about this person?

Post your reflection to the discussion board.  You may upload a pdf, doc, or Docx file.

Reply Post:
For this assignment:
Read the post of one of your peers and respond supportively to their post.  Select a person who has not yet received any replies.

Why did you choose to read their reflection?  What was it about their reflection or the person they wrote about that sparked your interest?  Did you find it interesting, intriguing, inspiring, etc?  Could you relate to them?  Elaborate on your comments.  Be supportive.

write a audio review
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16r14czTrewZ0JZDR4…
By a “review”, I mean a 2 to 3 page (double-spaced) discussion of what you liked and/or didn’t like about the various aspects of podcast production that we have just begun to talk about in class. So, everything from the tone of the speakers’ voices (appropriate for the subject matter &/or the general feel of the show; engaging?) to the sound quality; to use of music and any additional audio, like sound effects; the storytelling (if that’s what they’re doing); the depth of the information they provide; substantiation of their opinions; the entertainment value; the flow of the production (Do the producers do a good job of moving the dialogue onward, and keep you engaged throughout?); verbal economics — When the show is over, do you feel as though the producers covered their focus sufficiently, but without much in the way of “fluff” or unneeded dialogue? There’s other questions you can get into, of course, and different styles of podcasts will have different levels of importance on certain aspects of the production.