Describe an adverse selection problem a company is facing. What is the source of the asymmetric information? Who is the less informed party? What transactions are not being consummated as a result of the information? Could you (or do you) use signaling or screening to consummate these transactions? Offer your company some sound advice, complete with computations of the attendant profit consequences.The assignment is to answer the question provided above in essay form. This is to be in narrative form. Bullet points should not to be used. The paper should be at least 1.5 – 2 pages in length, Times New Roman 12-pt font, double-spaced, 1 inch margins and utilizing at least one outside scholarly or professional source related to organizational behavior. This does not mean blogs or websites. This source should be a published article in a scholarly journal. This source should provide substance and not just be mentioned briefly to fulfill this criteria. The textbook should also be utilized. Do not use quotes. Do not insert excess line spacing. APA formatting and citation should be used.

Critical Appraisal Paper The study chosen must be a Quantitative research study design). Criteria for approval (and therefore should be screened as part of your search strategy) are all of the following: published with the last 5 yearsrelevant to nursing (i.e., have nursing implications)uses quantitative methodology (data analysis uses statistical tests), not qualitative methodology (data analysis uses words)uses one, or a combination, of the following statistical tests to analyze data:Pearson correlation, Spearman rho correlationSimple Linear regression, Multiple Linear Regression (not Logistic Regression) T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi square (χ2), WilcoxonANOVA (ANalysis Of VAriance) (not Multiple Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) or Analysis of Co-Variance (ANCOVA) Suggested Topics for Critical Appraisal Project pain management fatigue caregiver burden UTI anxiety quality of life workplace bullying smoking cessation end-of-life care wound care sleep quality needle stick injuries colon cancer screening job satisfaction Handwashing

In your own words, answer this unit’s discussion questions in a main post (recommended minimum 200 words), and respond to at least 2 peers’ postings (recommended minimum 75 words).After you have reviewed the Assignment Details below, click the Discussion Board link under the My Work heading above to open the Discussion Board and make your post.Use these videos for help on how to post to the Discussion Board:AIU Student Mobile app viewDesktop viewAssignment DetailsBusinesses elect to use different accounting approaches. Two of the popular approaches are accrual and cash basis accounting methods.If you opened a small business, would you use the cash basis or the accrual basis of accounting?What factors would you consider in your decision?Read through your peers’ posts, and when you respond to them, consider the following:Provide suggestions on the additional factors that an organization should consider when selecting the cash or accrual method of accounting.Discuss why you agree or disagree with the rationale that your peers gave for their selection on the appropriate method.

What disease are you working on? (0 points) ( Alzehimer)
What sorts of issues might you have to overcome to manufacture your drugs for human and animal trials? What points of GMP (good manufacturing practice), GLP (good lab practice), or GCP (good clinical practice) do you need to be considering before you move to either animal or human clinical trials? (4 points)
Give an estimate of potential income from your drug per year in the United States: 
Number of people in US with disease X appropriate cost of drug per year (how many doses per year x how much per dose)? (4 points)

Will you treat for a few weeks or months or all year? (3 points)

Will you ever make a profit on the drug? Why or why not? Is it worth moving forward? (4 points)

How will you get funding for moving through the drug development pipeline? Describe likely funding possibilities at each stage of the process listed below:

Lead Identification and improvement? (2 points)

Animal studies? (2 points)

Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials? (2 points)

Phase 3 clinical trials? (2 points)

Post-approval marketing?  (2 poin

Module 12 Discussion: Qualitative Design, Sampling, and Data CollectionIn this module, we will be exploring qualitative research. This differs in a few ways from the quantitative research we have looked at so far in this course. Cummings, J. (2011). Sharing a traumatic event: The experience of the listener and the storyteller within the dyad. Nursing Research, 60(6), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182348823After reading the chapter, you will have a better understanding of some of the differences between quantitative and qualitative research. Use the “Guidelines for Critiquing Qualitative Research” resources in your textbook as a prompt to complete this week’s discussion. Remember that our goal is to determine whether an article is good or bad research and whether we should incorporate the findings into practice changes. We will take a “divide and conquer” approach this week. Please answer the following sets of guidelines and answer the corresponding questions about the Cummings (2011) article. Make sure that within your group, all of the guidelines are answered.