solved Activity #1:View Dr. Mitchell Yell’s presentation for the 7th annual
Activity #1:View Dr. Mitchell Yell’s presentation for the 7th annual Focus on Inclusion Conference (2018) “Endrew F.v.Douglas Co. School District (2017): Implications of the US Supreme Courts Decision for Special Education Administration & Teachers†(1.5 hours)Respond to the 6 recommendations Dr. Yell presents at the end of the video. This activity is worth 20 points. Recommendation #1:Continue to train IEP teams to avoid procedural violations in the development of the IEP that could, in and of themselves, constitute a denial of FAPE.Recommendation #2: Ensure meaningful Parent involvement in the IEP meetings and that their opinions are considered in establishing their child’s educational/behavioral goals.Recommendation #3: When developing the content of a student’s IEP and subsequently reviewing and revising it, be sure that the present level of performance and annual goals are based upon evaluations and other relevant data that are current.Recommendation #4: Ensure that IEP goals are Challenging, appropriately ambiguous, and measurable.Recommendation #5: Continuously monitor and measure a child’s progress on annual goals (and objectives, bencharks, if applicable) and maintain specific data to demonstrate. Recommendation #6: When progress reports and other data do not reflect that an annual goal will be met, reconvene the IEP team to determine why, make needed changes, and continue to collect data. Consider the following questions in your response.How does this recommendation impact your daily practice as an educator, administrator, assessment staff, etc.?What questions or concerns do you have regarding this recommendation when working with students with Severe Disabilities?How did Endrew F clarify the standard for determining FAPE and educational benefit?What does “progress in light of the child’s circumstances” mean?