solved Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?
In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.
To Prepare:

Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.
Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.
Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

Article 1
I choose the article “Client retention in community treatment: completer and non-completer experiences of an individualized, needs-based partner abuse intervention program.” since it relates to the clinical issue of interest which is understanding the issues that influenced late recovery of the client. The peer reviewed article was used to highlight the importance of incorporating therapeutic alliance and providing structured individualized treatment to participants of partner abuse intervention programs (Pearson et al., 2020). The research methodology applied was qualitative which focused on elaborating the target issue through data collected from books and other internet sources or materials. Qualitative research helps maintain good relationships between researchers and study participants hence the delivery of quality information. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews which were completed by 14 participants. The interviews added a strength for the research since information shared by the participants was valid based on their subjective experiences.
Article 2
I selected the article “High risk situations predicting relapse in self-referred addicts to Bushehr province substance abuse treatment centres” since it provides a deeper explanation of the effective strategies for relapse prevention which is a major clinical issue of interest. The study was used to evaluate high risk situations for relapse self-referred drug addicts. Researchers used IDTS Marlatt questionnaires to conduct analytical and descriptive statistics. The questionnaires added a strength to the study since they assessed high risk situations that influence relapse on self-referred addicts in substance abuse centres (Shafiei et al., 2014). Questionnaires are more practical and easier to analyse which is a major strength when using them to collect data for quantitative studies. The qualitative study helped highlight major clinical and psychological strategies used to minimize the high rates of relapse.
Article 3
I selected the article “Relapse Coping Strategies in Young Adults Addicts: A Quantitative Study in Iran” since it provides a highlight of the cognitive-behavioural coping approach used to prevent relapse among young adult addicts. The coping strategies are used to replace incompatible behavior with compatible answers. Research was conducted through a quantitative study whereby a sample of 70 self-referred drug addicts were examined (Shafiei et al., 2016). The participants shared information about relapse coping strategies through questionnaires. Quantitative research enables generalization of research findings through objective and accurate information shared by the study participants. The data collection method was efficient since it helped highlight coping skills effective for young adults. Information shared through the questionnaire was valid and efficient, a factor that influenced successful research.
Article 4
I selected the article “A qualitative exploration of social support during treatment for severe alcohol use disorder and recovery” since it relates to the clinical issue of social support required for recovering addicts. Data collected through the study explains complex issues and barriers experienced by individuals recovering. Qualitative research was conducted to help incorporate the human experience when undergoing treatment for severe alcohol use disorder. Researchers conducted interviews in 2014 and 2015 and an in-depth thematic analysis of topics related to social support (Brooks et al., 2017). The interviews presented a strength in the study since they highlighted the relationship between quality and nature of sustained sobriety when patients transition from the research facilities in charge of rehabilitation treatment in the community.
References
Brooks, A. T., Lòpez, M. M., Ranucci, A., Krumlauf, M., & Wallen, G. R. (2017). A qualitative exploration of social support during treatment for severe alcohol use disorder and recovery. Addictive behaviors reports, 6, 76-82.
Pearson, D. A., Steward, C. D., & Ford, A. K. (2020). Client retention in community treatment: completer and noncompleter experiences of an individualized, needs-based partner abuse intervention program. Journal of interpersonal violence, 0886260520907356.
Shafiei, E., Hoseini, A. F., Bibak, A., & Azmal, M. (2014). High risk situations predicting relapse in self-referred addicts to bushehr province substance abuse treatment centers. International journal of high risk behaviors & addiction, 3(2).
Shafiei, E., Hoseini, A. F., Parsaeian, F., Heidarinejad, A., & Azmal, M. (2016). Relapse coping strategies in young adults addicts: A quantitative study in Iran. Indian journal of psychological medicine, 38(1), 46-49.