solved Case Analysis 1 : Tesla, Inc. Objectives of Case Analysis:

Case Analysis 1 : Tesla, Inc.
Objectives of Case Analysis:
i. Apply frameworks to the complicated problems of actual businesses.
ii. Diagnose strategic issues, evaluate strategic alternatives, and formulate workable . Learn by explaining your analysis to other members of the class. iii. Listen to and learn from the insights of other students. 
Case 1: The case scheduled for discussion in Week 7. Please submit your work no later than 24 hours prior to the discussion of the case in the synchronous session in which it is scheduled for discussion.
Your case analysis should be no longer than one page, single spaced, 11-point Times New Roman font with margins of 1 inch on both sides. Case analysis must be submitted in Word or PDF file format.
Format for Case Analysis plans of action
1. Your case write-up should begin with a short executive summary that highlights your stand on the case. This summary should be no longer than two sentences. The remainder of the case write-up should present in greater detail the analyses that support your conclusions. 
2. The case is designed to get you to think about issues. In analyzing and writing up the case, adopt the perspective of a consultant who has been hired by the company to succinctly advise it on the critical issues at hand. Stitch together the arguments in a smooth way in your write-up. 
3. Be sure to use the data in the case when appropriate. Write-ups that ignore relevant data are incomplete. However, note that just because some data are presented in the case, it does not necessarily mean that the data are crucial or relevant to the solution you propose. Good strategists know what data to use, and how that data must be used. 
Effective Case Writing 
Below are some issues to consider when crafting your case analysis. 
Analysis: (Understanding the issues that the firms and individuals in the case are facing) 

Does the paper contain analyses of the major issues?• Do the analyses properly incorporate the relevant tools?• Do the analyses show the relationships among issues?• Are assumptions made in the analyses stated explicitly?• Do the analyses isolate the underlying causes of problems?Recommendations (Developing and evaluating alternative courses of action)• Are criteria for making recommendations stated/appropriate?• Are a broad range of feasible options thoughtfully considered?• Are the recommendations clearly articulated?• Is the action plan integrated in a logical way into the analysis?• Is the action plan specific, complete, and feasible?• Are timing (short-term, long-term phasing) issues addressed?• Are the expected benefits of the recommendations stated?Overall Criteria (Presenting ideas in a coherent, articulate, and professional manner)• Are the analyses in the exhibits (if any) done correctly?• Do the exhibits (if any) support and add to key points in text?• Is the paper logically consistent and effectively structured?• Is there a high likelihood that the recommendations will achieve their desired results?• Does the choice of words, spelling, grammar, and other elements of style improve the qualityand clarity of the analyses and recommendations?