solved Discuss the following with respect to the classical and positivist

Discuss the following with respect to the classical and positivist schools of criminology:Discuss the historical context of the origins (emergence) of this perspective.Discuss the assumptions made by this school of thought regarding the nature of human beings and their behavior (i.e., the essential ideas of classical thought).Describe why crime occurs, according to each perspective.Discuss the crime-control implications of each perspective. What should be done to reduce crime? What are the criticisms of each perspective?Discuss how today’s criminal justice system both overlaps and departs from classical criminology.Question 2:Explain the differences in individual-level and societal-level (i.e. macro and micro) theories about crime causation. Using the theoretical perspectives we’ve covered so far, discuss ways in which macro-level criminogenic forces can interact with individual level processes to produce crime.Question 3:Explain the differences in assumptions of human nature and criminal motivation between learning, strain, and control theories. How do these different assumptions impact the questions asked about why people commit crime? Finally, Discuss how these different assumptions relate to their explanations of criminal behavior.Question 4:Explain the work of Merton, including his proposed theory of crime, identify the key criticisms/weaknesses of his perspective. What later theories were developed and how did they refine or add to Merton’s theory to address those weakness or criticisms of Merton’s earlier theory?Question 5:Describe the relationship among social disorganization, collective efficacy, and legal cynicism. How do the concepts from each theory influence one another? What are the policy implications of these perspectives? Grading RubricCriteriaBelow Expectations0 – 79%Competent80 – 89%Exemplary90 – 100%Content(25 points)Student has missed one or more questions or did not fully address all parts of the questions. Little to no effort to incorporate or cite relevant course materials.Student answers all questions, but may not fully address all parts of each question. Most responses incorporate and cites relevant course material, but may be missing a couple key sources.Student answers all questions and each response addresses all parts of the question fully and completely. Responses incorporates and cites all relevant course materials to answer question, including textbook, articles, and lectures, etc. Responses includes specific references and examples from the materials. Understanding(25 points)Includes multiple inaccuracies. Does not demonstrate comprehension of materials. There are clear gaps in knowledge.Most information is accurate. Responses mostly demonstrate comprehension of knowledge of relevant readings, but may not clearly articulate one or more key concepts, theories, or issues.Information in responses is accurate. Responses effectively demonstrates comprehension of knowledge of relevant readings, and expertly articulates key concepts, theories, and issues related to the field. Application & Analysis(25 points) Mostly summarizes with not synthesis of information. Student fails to draw meaningful connections between readings, concepts, or modules.Student tends to summarize more than synthesize information. Student mostly provides meaningful elaboration and draws some connections between materials, concepts, and module issues.Responses synthesizes knowledge to address the question. Student effectively uses course materials to provide meaningful elaboration and successfully draws connections between materials, concepts, and module issues. Structure(15 points)Response are disorganized and difficult to follow.Reponses mostly flow logically, but may also include some tangents or disorganized thoughts.Response has a logical flow and clear organizational structure. Evidence of planning and intention of response structure before writing Style & Mechanics(10 points)Does not follow APA format. Has multiple grammatical, spelling and citation errors. Mostly follows APA formatting, but may have some mistakes. A few grammatical, spelling and citation errors. Most response are clear and concise.Response follows APA format, including in-text citations and reference list. Writing is free from grammatical, spelling, and citation errors. Responses are written in a clear and concise manner.