solved Explain the arguements of both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Which

Explain the arguements of both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Which side do you agree with and why?
chapter 6-7 -The Unfinished Nation
Classmate 1
One of the great debates in American history was over the ratification of the Constitution in 1787-1788. Those who supported the Constitution, and a stronger national republic were known as Federalists. Those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in favor of small, localized government were known as Anti-Federalists. Both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were concerned with the preservation of liberty, however, they disagreed over whether a strong national government would preserve or eventually destroy the liberty of the American people. The Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. They favored small, localized governments with limited national authority as was exercised under the Articles of Confederation. They generally believed a republican government was only possible on the state level and would not work on the national level. Anti-federalist also lacked bill of rights. Most Anti-Federalists feared that without a bill of rights, the Constitution would not be able to sufficiently protect the rights of individuals and the states. I agree with the actions of an anti-federalist because They believed local governments best understood what citizens needed and would best protect citizens’ freedom. 
Classmate 2
Federalists had to come to an agreement with all states which is the constitution to share power in order to support a structural government that is Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. The three branches limit the power so that the central government could not be as powerful. In the end, they agreed to add amendments known as the Bill of Rights. Focus is more so in the favor of the wealthy with winning people with capital to gain more capital. The Anti-Federalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution, Anti-Federalists argued against the expansion of national power. They were worried about the rights of the citizens. Defenders of the true principles of revolution. Constitution increased taxes and weakened the states favor the “Well Born” over the common people. Their biggest complaint was a lack of a bill of rights. I’m in the agreeance of the Anti-Federalists if I had to choose. I’m not into politics whatsoever. I feel it is a way to control and manipulate people. It detaches people from themselves and what it truly means to be on this earth. I consider myself a humanitarian which is why I would go with the Anti-Federalist. They appear to be more so for the welfare of people as a whole. I feel like the world should be a space of peace and unity, not controlled by power and greed. Everyone wants a fair chance of having an opportunity of living and surviving on a fair spectrum financially and environmentally.