solved from the list of assessments select and take the following

from the list of assessments select and take the following assessments:1. Are you a Team Player?2. What Team Roles do you Prefer?3. What is your Preferred Conflict Handling Style?A. Write a paper starting with an intro and then for part one, discuss your results in all three assessments.(RESULTS ARE ATTACHED)B. In part two, discuss how the results relate to each other and how they may impact your careerambitions. Provide your own personal examples.C.In part three, explore two areas for development and create a written action plan to improve in thoseareas.Wrap up your paper with a short conclusion.Organize your paper with proper APA headings.No abstract is necessary.Support your paper with 6-8 scholarly research sources.The paper should be between 1,500 and 1,700 words and written using APA format.UCW Master’s Level Grading Rubric For Assessment – General Rubric1-4 Scale1234Percentage Score0-5960-6768-7172-7576-7980-8485-8990-100GradesFCB-BB+A-AA+Mastery LevelWeightStudent ScoreBeginningDevelopingCompetentMasteryStandard LevelBelow StandardApproaching StandardAt StandardExceeds StandardSubject MatterAnswering questions and results of research50Key elements are not adequately covered. Content is not comprehensive, has inaccuracies and is not persuasive. Displays lack of understanding of relevant theory. Points not adequately supported by references. Research is lacking in content and qualityKey elements are mostly covered. Content is mostly accurate but lacks persuasiveness. Displays some understanding of relevant theory. Points mostly supported by references. Research is lacking in content and qualityKey elements are adequately covered. Content is accurate and persuasive. Displays adequate understanding of relevant theory. Points supported by references. Research is adequate in content and qualityKey elements are completely covered. Content is comprehensive, accurate and persuasive. Displays superior understanding of relevant theory. Points fully supported by specific references. Research is superior in content and qualityOrganization & Critical ThinkingDemonstration of thought processand analysis of problem and resolution using own thoughts and ideas20Introduction provides poor level of background of paperStructure of paper is not clear and is difficult to follow train of thought processConclusion does not follow logically from body of paperCritical Thinking is lacking: missing logicalargumentation & reasoning, concrete examples & valid inferencesIntroduction provides background of paper missing some key elementsStructure of paper is not clear and it is not easy to follow train of thought process Conclusion follows from body of paper but misses key pointsCritical Thinking is not fully present: missing key points of logicalargumentation & reasoning, concrete examples & valid inferencesIntroduction provides good level of background of paperStructure of paper is clear and train of thought process is understandable Conclusion mostly follows logically from body of paperCritical Thinking is present: logical argumentation & reasoning shows, reasonable examples & valid inferences are madeIntroduction provides superior level of background of paperStructure of paper is very clear and easy to follow train of thought process Conclusion follows logically from body of paperCritical Thinking is present through: logicalargumentation & reasoning, concrete examples & valid inferencesStyle & MechanicsAPAApplication of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted report107th Ed. APA Manual is not followed or there are significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are quite inadequate but do not rise to the level of plagiarism7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in:formatted title page, formatted references pages,in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including: properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct contextGrammar/Punctuation/ SpellingUse of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable paper.10Grammar and sentence structure has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty with major errors in punctuation andspellingGrammar and sentence structure has problems following standard English rules and reads with some difficulty witherrors in punctuation andspellingGrammar and sentence structure mostly follows standard English rules and reads reasonably well with few errors in punctuation andspellingGrammar and sentence structure follows standard English rules and reads well with excellent punctuation andspellingReadability & StyleClarity of thought and appropriate level of language use that brings the author’s thoughts and ideas to the reader.10Sentences are lacking in completeness, clearness, conciseness and are not wellstructured. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought. Words are ambiguous. Tone is inappropriate to audience/assessm ent. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used.Sentences need to be more complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions do not maintain flow of thought well. Words are not precise and have some ambiguity. Tone is not appropriate to audience/assessm ent. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used too much.Sentences are mostly complete, clear, concise and well-constructed. Transitions mostly maintain flow of thought.Words are mostly precise with little ambiguity. Tone is mostly appropriate to audience/assessm ent. Colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing is used sparingly.Sentences are consistently complete, clear, concise and wellconstructed with strong, varied structure. Transitions consistently maintain flow of thought. Words are quite precise and unambiguous. Tone is completely appropriate to audience/assessm ent. No colloquial language or inappropriate use of paraphrasing used.