solved Go to PubMed (Links to an external site.). Type the

Go to PubMed (Links to an external site.). Type the search query Fibrinolytic versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention into the PubMed search bar and hit the Search button. My Search Results Assignment Instructions and Requirements: “Outcomes of Fibrinolytic Therapy vs. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).” the literature review is a more thorough critique of the literature which compares findings between the articles.You will be evaluating research which compares the two treatment options (fibrinolytic therapy and PCI), using the articles you retrieved from your PubMed database search. You will read each article, comparing them to the article you selected and critically evaluate the following: Study methodology Study populations Conclusions drawn from the research data Study strengths and limitations Identify gaps in the research Relationships between the studies Below are some important requirements for this assignment: The literature review needs to review at least 7 articles. some of them might be relevant. You should now possess the ability to search for new journal articles through PubMed. Most students in the past have had to go back and pull additional journal articles from PubMed. Use proper APA format Cite sources within your document. One citation cannot be used to cover an entire paragraph. Any information that is not your own words, thoughts, or ideas must be cited. Requirements state at least 3 pages long (not including cover and reference pages) but may be longer. Content is more important than length. We do not allow the use of quoted material in this class. You should try paraphrasing instead of quoting and then cite the reference. Take the time to really read your chosen Fibrinolytic versus PCI article a few times over in order to fully develop a review summary and determine the usefulness report. How would you further research/resolve health outcomes after an acute myocardial infarction? Below is an outline for you to follow as you write your literature review: Literature Review Outline Introduction (should be about half a page in length) Describe your overall field of study (i.e. myocardial infarction, what it is, why it needs to be addressed quickly, briefly list options.) The introduction describes background information on your topic and the purpose of your paper. Treatment Option 1 (should be about one page in length) Let’s start the ball rolling by using your single chosen article, the one that you wrote your contribution to the group annotated bibliography. Pull out one of the important areas of this article and its relation to the conclusion of the study. You need to address who did what, where, when, why (purpose), and briefly how. Your summary should also summarize the study’s worth to the scientific community. Now that you you’ve gotten the ball rolling go back and look at the other annotations from your group members. Hopefully, you spot another article or two that closely relates to this important article and discuss how it relates, either supporting the point from the first article or disputing it. In your own words address who did what, where, when, why (purpose), and briefly how. Your summary should also summarize the study’s worth to the scientific community. Treatment Option 2 (should be between half and one page in length) Using the articles from your annotated bibliography, pull out one of the important areas of this article and its relation to the conclusion of the study. You need to address who did what, where, when, why (purpose), and briefly how. Your summary should also summarize the study’s worth to the scientific community. Now go back and look at the other annotations. Hopefully, you spot another article or two that closely relates to this important article and discuss how it relates, either supporting the point from the first article or disputing it. In your own words address who did what, where, when, why (purpose), and briefly how. Your summary should also summarize the study’s worth to the scientific community. Conclusion (1-2 paragraphs): This will briefly describe the overall strengths and weaknesses of the field. What piece of information is missing? How might that missing information be further investigated? Reference Page: Last page, no less than 7 journal articles, APA format Note: Abstracts are not required for this assignment.