solved I’m working on a Writing question and need guidance to

I’m working on a Writing question and need guidance to help me study.

part 1: I need you to do some research about Covid-19 Impact on Social Media and write a presentation paper that I read it in at least 15 mins. make sure It’s enough for at least 15 mins of reading.
part 2:
This is an outline of my classmate presentation of the same topic, I need you to add some of the point that you will get from doing the research on part 1 and add them to this outline ( at least 5 mine points ):
THE OUTLINE:
How COVID-19 impacted Social Media usage. 
Communication
Virtual meeting: zoom, 
Entertainments
Gathering news and information related to COVID 19 and others
Coping mechanism 
Also in part 2 I need you to give me a simple answer of this question:
What if COVID happened 20 years before, do you think we would be able to function as if now, like communication, meeting, entertainments, and gathering information would be easier back than? 
part 3:
AGAIN, I need you do some other research of the same topic and write a presentation paper that I read it in at least 10 mins. make sure It’s enough for at least 10 mins of reading. But the difference on this part is that you need to do these research on these three sources:
Source 1:

Topic: The changes in the effects of social media use of Cypriots due to COVID-19 pandemic (Kaya, 2020).
Bibliographic Information: Kaya, T. (2020). The changes in the effects of social media use of Cypriots due to COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 63, 101380.
Original author’s credentials: The author, Tugberk Kaya, is an assistant professor at the Cyprus International University and works under the management information systems department. 
Author’s argument: Covid-19 led to an increase in social media use since Cypriots follow recent information through these platforms. Moreover, the article states that the shift is towards official sources due to the awareness of fake information on the web. 
Evidence used in support of the author’s major claims: Evidence used to support the author’s claims is the findings of a statistical analysis of primary data that was collected using an online questionnaire filled by 668 participants. The information was then analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha value to ensure validity and reliability. 
Personal reaction to the argument and why: My reaction to the argument is that the author’s claim is free of bias due to statistical data analysis and the collection of information from many sources. In this way, the author eliminates researcher bias hence presenting valid and reliable information. 
Why this source be an interesting contribution to my CTS project: The article will contribute to my CTS project since it elaborates not only on the increased social media use but also the factors that led to this increase during the pandemic.

Source 2:

Topic: COVID-19’s Impact on Facebook and Social Media Advertising (GLG, 2020).
Bibliographic Information: GLG. (2020, March 23). COVID-19’s Impact on Facebook and Social Media Advertising | GLG. GLG. Retrieved 20 June 2021, from https://glginsights.com/articles/covid-19s-impact-on-facebook-and-social-media-advertising/.
Original author’s credentials: The article was published by the Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), a financial services organization, as a professional publication to experts in the field. 
Author’s argument: Although most articles provide a claim, this publication presents the results of an interview with the chief executive officer (CEO) of a significant digital advertising company and a GLG council member regarding the effect of covid-19 on social media advertising and Facebook. According to the article, social media spending dropped by 10 to 15 percent due to the effect of the pandemic on industries such as hospitality, travel, and big-industry retail. Moreover, GLG writes that although some companies aimed to stay aloof during the pandemic by increasing advertising, the increases were still less than the decreases. 
Evidence used in support of the author’s major claims: The evidence used to support the claims made in the article entails the information and statistical data attained from interviewing a primary source to get first-hand information. 
Personal reaction to the argument and why: My reaction to the argument is that the information is credible since the article provides information from a primary source, the CEO. Moreover, the CEO supports the claims using statistical information and examples, which provide evidence of the claims.
Why this source be an interesting contribution to my CTS project: The article will be an interesting contribution to my CTS project since it provides first-hand information concerning the effect of covid-19 on social media and provides an insight into the effect of covid-19 on major social media firms such as Facebook and Instagram.

Source 3:

Topic: Impact of COVID-19 on social media as perceived by the oncology community: results from a survey in collaboration with the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the OncoAlert Network (Morgan et al., 2021).
Bibliographic information: Morgan, G., Tagliamento, M., Lambertini, M., Devnani, B., Westphalen, B., Dienstmann, R., … & Peters, S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on social media as perceived by the oncology community: results from a survey in collaboration with the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the OncoAlert Network. ESMO open, 6(2), 100104.
Original author’s credentials: The authors are oncologists and members of the OncoAlert Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology. 
Author’s argument: According to the article, the authors claim that due to covid-19, social media played a useful role in keeping oncologists with up-to-date cancer care and supporting interactions with patients. Moreover, the authors claim that two-thirds of oncologists increased social media use to deliver care to patients in various locations during the pandemic. 
Evidence used in support of the author’s major claims: The evidence used to support the claim is data attained from a survey that comprised 1067 stakeholders and physicians of the oncology sector. 
Personal reaction to the argument and why: My reaction to the argument is that the claims are valid since the authors collect first-hand information from the targeted study group, thus providing reliable information. Moreover, the study group is larger, which means that there is a lesser possibility of bias.
Why this source be an interesting contribution to my CTS project: The article will be an interesting contribution to my CTS project since it provides an insight into the use of social media after the pandemic among oncologists, reasons for shifting towards social media, and issues affecting the popularity of these platforms among medical professionals in the field.