solved In this assignment, you will write a 3-4 paragraph (700

In this assignment, you will write a 3-4 paragraph (700 words ± 50) critique about a fellow student’s case analysis That will be posted in the case Discussion forums, as well as submitted for grading to the assessment page of the course. The critique should be concise and compelling and should propel a broader discussion among the rest of the class. Your book will serve as a resource, but research is required to support recommendations.To complete the peer critique, you will prepare a 3-4 paragraph (700 words ± 50) ritique that addresses the following questions:Does the analysis present key information clearly and effectively?Are the key points presented in the case supported by information from the case and/or research?What components do you feel are most compelling?What components do you feel could be more fully supported?Overall, were you convinced with the analysis presented in the case?Peer Critique of Case Analysis must be submitted through the Submission link found on the assignment page for grading and posted as a document in the appropriate case Discussion forum. the case rubric for evaluation Needs workDevelopingDevelopedExcellingIntroductionIntroduction to the Organization: Company History. Current Status. Products. Latest news. Executives. Business Model (10%)None of the essential materials are included. Company introduction is missingSome of the essential materials are included. A basic introduction to the company with some focus on history and present status. All the details are from the company website.Most of the essential elements of the materials are included. A good introduction to the company, the current status of the company is covered and key executives and business model are mentioned along with some insights on the company’s standing in the market. Both the company website and other reliable sources have been used to write the analysisExceptional work with all of the key elements if the materials required for this section included. The sources of the analysis are dependable with a discussion on how the company presents itself and how others view it. Most of the analysis is based on third-party reliable sources.IndustryII Identification of Industry & competitors:Identify the industry in which the company operates, discuss its position in the industry with regards to its competitors, identify all competitors and also identify reasons for their positioning in the industry (15%)Fails to address industry(ies) in which an organization competes and/or its competition.Identifies one or the other (industry and its competitors) or identifies correct industry but wrong competitors or vice versa. Data sources are not mentioned.Lists and briefly discusses industry(ies) in which organization competes & its competitors –Data sources are mentioned but are not very reliableLists and briefly discusses industry(ies) in which organization competes & its competitors. Positions the organization with regards to its industry and competitors and provides evidence from reliable data sources.OrganizationIII Analysis of Organization: Mission, Vision, Core Values, Operating Guidelines, Core Competencies, Goals (15%)Meets some of the basic criteria for this Outline Item, but fails to demonstrate knowledge of theories needed to address most of the requirements.Meets the basic criteria for this Outline Item, but fails to demonstrate knowledge of, or capability to apply, theories needed to address some of the requirements.Meets the criteria for this Outline Items, and demonstrates knowledge of, or capability to apply, theories needed to address the requirements. Good understanding of how these values guide the organization.Demonstrates knowledge and capability to apply theories and tools in the analysis of the organization in terms of its mission, vision, core values, operating guidelines, and core competencies.InternalIV Analysis of Internal factors that impact the company: policies, people, culture, executives- studying the inside story (15%)Meets some of the basic criteria for this Outline Item, but fails to demonstrate knowledge of theories needed to address most of the requirements. Points or issues are obsolete and the internal environmental factors cov