solved Part 1: Watch the YouTube video, Sex & the Price

Part 1: Watch the YouTube video, Sex & the Price of Masculinity, here: https://youtu.be/MOSU7B8iR-Q (Links to an external site.) and respond to 3 of the following questions:   What are some reactions you experienced, both positive and negative, while watching the video? Why do you think you had these experiences? How would you define sexual consent? From your understanding, is this situation common? Is this something that good people could do without even realizing it? Why or why not? How was compassion relevant in this story? Why do you think compassion is important in sexual situations? How do you think students overall could improve on clear sexual communication? 
Part 2: Respond to at least one of your classmate’s posts.
What are some reactions you experienced, both positive and negative while watching the video? Why do you think you had these experiences?
I did not like this video. I know that Dr. JennsDen is a sociologist and a sexologist, and she wants to raise awareness about sexual consent and “talking about it more and doing less.” However, going back to last week’s lecture on traditional values. I was raised with the values that if you are not willing to have sex with another person you should not allow intimate games. Moreover, a woman should never allow these intimate games if they are not in love with the other person. My cultural values are the reason why I felt that the video was a hypocrite because she gave her consent to have intimacy without intercourse. Obviously, she lost her mind when she did not even feel the penetration. We as a woman felt the difference between fingers or penis. Similarly, I learned this saying, “don’t play with fire because you can get burn.” On the other hand, I think she could get my attention if she talked about how to talk, express, identify, and report abuses when you are not consenting to be physically touched.
How would you define sexual consent?
Sexual consent for me can occur by verbally agreeing or when you allow your pattern, boyfriend, or husband to touch your body and you are not saying no, you are not covering yourself with your hands or other object or moving away.
From your understanding, is this situation common? Is this something that good people could do without even realizing it? Why or why not?
I am not sure if what happened to Dr. JennsDen is common or not. Especially because from my perspective she agreed to the intercourse from the moment that she allowed this person to touch her genitals. I do think sex can happen once you are interacting (willingly) in intimacy and a good person can advance to intercourse without even realized. I might be wrong, but I have the same assumption that Dr. JennsDen criticized that “when sexual interaction starts, we are on a sex train that no one can stop.” She proved it when she did not feel the penetration.
How was compassion relevant in this story? Why do you think compassion is important in sexual situations?
I think that compassion is important in this story because it was a mutual agreement on having intimacy without intercourse.
How do you think students overall could improve on clear sexual communication?
I feel that we need to learn more to communicate verbally to not create confusion. As Dr. JennsDen said, “we need to talk more and do less.” However, I believe that when we are in a relationship it is easy to see when someone wants to jump directly to intimacy or intercourse. We (women and men) need to learn to say “NO, I do not want this, we need to talk first.” Because as Dr. JennsDen said, having intercourse has consequences, such as social, physical, and financial.