solved Please read the Los Angeles Times article posted on Canvas

Please read the Los Angeles Times article posted on Canvas entitled, “United States Supreme Court Signals end of Roe v. Wade.”
Essay Prompt:  If the United States Supreme Court overrules Roe v. Wade and/or rules that abortion is not a constitutionally protected right (at least pre-viability), the consequences will principally fall on an intersection of two historically disadvantaged groups:  the poor and women, to wit, pregnant women who desire an abortion and who lack the financial means to travel to another state where abortion services may be available.  In your essay address whether the above outcome, if accurate (and you may assert flaws in its statement), is coincidental or represents a predictable result traceable, in part, to the “collective conscience” of the propertied white male framers (i.e., authors) of the United States Constitution, Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments are called the Bill of Rights), and the Fourteenth Amendment.  See e.g., Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 174 (1973) (dissenting opinion), “To reach its result, the Court necessarily has had to find within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently completely unknown to the drafters of the Amendment.”
Your reference “tools” (permissible sources) for Writing Assignment No. 1 are the United States Constitution, as amended, Chapters 1 and 2 of Law 101, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to the Sociology of the Law, and class and course materials posted to Canvas, including but not limited to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Roe v. Wade, Bowers v. Hardwick and Lawrence v. Texas.