solved Response 1;Â 1. After reviewing the memes, you can tell

Response 1; 
1. After reviewing the memes, you can tell that they are very different approaches to the second amendment right, the first meme is trying to preserve the second amendment right and the second meme is very against the second amendment. The right to bare arms has been apart of the bill of rights ever since it was written and the first meme is insinuating that people are wanting to alter the second amendment because when it was put into place all of the different types of weapons and guns were not created nor considered during this time period. This is challenging because obviously the world is changing constantly and there are new inventions coming out and that can alter things but the second amendment does not provoke unsafely practices of weapons. The second meme is making the second amendment seem like it is causing deaths and is a form of “domestic terrorism” because they believe that the second amendment right should not be in effect. 
2. I believe that someone who is conservative/republican or someone that wanted to preserve the second amendment right created the first meme and someone who is liberal/democratic or someone who is against the second amendment right created the second meme.
3. The memes reveal that the controversy regarding the second amendment rights have to do with safety, in both memes you can tell that they are concerned about their safety and protection with the second amendment rights. The first meme is wanting the right to bare arms to be able to protect themselves, just like back in the past they were looking for the same. The second meme believes that evoking the second amendment gives an unsafe country leading to deaths and unsafe gun practices. 

Response 2

1. The memes convey that the second amendment is used as a purpose of protection within private ownerships and can be used by the military. They incorporate the NRA to support their opinion on the fact that they are supplying these domestic terrorists and they themselves are a domestic terrorist organization. 
2. The person who created these memes must have two different opinions on the second amendment rights. One is believing that the second amendment should be altered because many things have changed since the second amendment was written, ARs and other guns were not invented during this time so they were not considering these advanced weapons. The other meme is questioning the NRA and people that want to preserve the second amendment. This person probably wants to completely outlaw the ability to use firearms and own guns and they back this up by involving the fact that weapons are easily accessible to children. 
3. The memes tell you that the debate on the second amendment has to deal with the fact that the United States has evolved with the amount of weapons there are and the less wars and the increase in safety. For example, back then it was a necessity to have weapons because of the lack of laws and the fact that there were no police or things of that nature to protect you from the horrible things that can happen. Now there is less need for guns and many believe that children can easily access these weapons that the second amendment allows for you to have.

response 3

Subject: Vaccine mandate in L.A
Source: https://ktla.com/news/local-news/proof-of-vaccinat…
Links to an external site.
Synopsis: Vaccine documentation required to enter places
Opinion: Personally I think it is not fair to deny people entry or entering a building just because they are not vaccinated. Some stores will not let you in if you do not have any shoes or shirt which makes sense. Some states like New York require citizens to obtain the vaccine or else they will be terminated from their job. Some people are second guessing the thought of taking the vaccine due to medical reasons or lack of research. I just think it is not fair at all, regardless if you are vaccinated or not people are still at risk of catching Covid-19. They would still have to take precautions and be safe. Everyone should be allowed to enter with a mask regardless of their vaccination status. Also, some companies are paying employees a one time bonus to report their vaccination status. That seems fishy to me, why include an incentive in that scenario? Some people will take it and go beyond the drastic measures just because of the incentives that are offered.