solved Review the judicial decision in the environmental law case “County

Review the judicial decision in the environmental law case “County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund” (read the actual case decision written by the judge; you may also read additional analyses or summaries but you must read the court’s decision). The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate a judge or court’s interpretation of environmental law and the effects of that ruling on the parties and the broader community.Cite primary sources, court documents, in addition to secondary sources like newspapers, blogs, or social media posts. Citing primary sources is a vital part.Cite your sources using Turabian Author-Date style citations (Links to an external site.).Your analysis should include detailed, evidence-based responses to the following questions:Who are the parties? What is the problem? What are the main arguments raised by the plaintiff and defendant? In addition to the plaintiff and defendant, who are stakeholders and what are their needs and perspectives?How did the court apply the law to this dispute? What laws and provisions are at issue in this case? What facts did the court find significant?What major findings or decision(s) did the court reach, including concurring or dissenting opinions?What is the relationship between regulatory agencies, stakeholders, and various jurisdictions (e.g. federal, state, or local jurisdictions) in implementing this decision?What were the effects of the decision on the parties, other entities (industry, federal/state/local government, advocates, citizens, etc.), and the substantive effect on the environment and economy?How will this case impact future behavior? This will not be in the case opinion, but your own analysis and writing supported by outside evidence