solved Your paper requires you to write a persuasive essay in

Your paper requires you to write a persuasive essay in answer to one of the questions below, or to some other question you discuss with me beforehand. The paper should be double-spaced in 12-point font (Times New Roman, Goudy Old Style, Garamond, etc.)

Are moral values always more important than other values (for example, values rooted in self-interest, law, or good manners)?
Are there fundamental values? If so, what are they?
Are there objective truths about what’s right and wrong?
Is right and wrong determined by individual beliefs and commitments? (i.e. Is subjectivism true?)
Is right and wrong determined by individual cultures? (i.e. Is popular relativism true?)
Does the will of God determine what’s right and wrong?
Does the nature of God determine what’s right and wrong?
What is the best theory of autonomy?
Are human beings ever really autonomous?
Is the moral reasoning approach the best way to think about ethics?
Is the moral reflection approach the best way to think about ethics?
Is the right action always the one that most benefits yourself?

Here are some step by step instructions.
(1) The first thing you should do is identify your thesis. Your thesis is a one-sentence version of your answer to one of the questions above.
(2) The next thing you need to do is outline the argument for the thesis. State and number each of the premises. It should be perfectly clear and obvious what your argument is. For example:
P1) Full autonomy requires authenticity: the capacity to reflect critically on our values.
P2) We will be unable to reflect critically on our values unless we develop relationships with others, whose values may differ from our own.
C) Full autonomy requires relationships with others.
(3) Then, explain the logical relationship between your premises and the conclusion. Ask yourself, “Is it possible for someone to agree with my premises but disagree with my conclusion? If not, why not? If so, what premise can I add that would fill the logical gap or make the hidden assumption clear?” Would the truth of your premises guarantee that you conclusion is also true? If not, would the truth of your premises show that your conclusion is very likely to be true? (These questions are about whether your argument is a deductive or inductive argument.)
(4) Next, explain each of your premises in turn. Do your premises contain words or ideas that are not clear? Explain them. If your premises are controversial (i.e. If they’re not obvious to common sense), give an argument for them. Clearly identify the premises of that argument. Given that this is a short paper, you probably want to stick to premises that are as non-controversial as possible. Or, try to come up with an argument with only one really controversial premise, and concentrate your efforts there.