solved The aim of this short paper assignment is to accurately

The aim of this short paper assignment is to accurately reconstruct and critically assess the argument described below:Reconstruct Jeffrey Reiman’s argument for abolishing the death penalty. Then, offer your own critical assessment of Reiman’s argument. In order to do this, you must either:i) critique this argument by presenting a strong objection to it, or:ii) defend it by considering a strong objection to it and responding to the objection. Your task will be both to clearly reconstruct an author’s argument (same as the previous argument) and offer your own (positive or negative) critical assessment of this argument. In this essay it is essential that you take a clear position and offer compelling reasons to support it. Below I have attached a Word file labelled, “PHIL 1002- Instructions for Assignment” Please follow everything exactly in that doc. Overall, make sure double-space, 12 font, times new roman preferred, WORD LIMIT IS 800 WORDS. Do not go over!!! That means it should be about 4-5 pages. You NEED to cite the assigned texts that I am attaching to this assignment as it will guarantee my mark higher than 80%. APA style is preferred. I also attached a doc labelled, “Sample Argument Reconstruction Essay”. This is an example of what my prof is looking for BUT this time we need to take a clear position and offer critical assessment thats positive or negative as well.I have also attached a doc labelled, “Lecture notes”- this not only has notes on Jeffrey Reiman’s argument on punishment but also what an argument is and how to put it into standard form. Which can also be used if necessary. I attached another doc labelled, “Jeffrey: course kit” which is the reading given to us on this approach that needs to be USED in the paper to cite. Please use at least a good 3 citations from the course kit and if you can try to put his argument into Standard form. Look at sample!