solved 3.2 E / 1a, c, f; 2a – f (Truth,

3.2 E / 1a, c, f; 2a – f (Truth, Falsity, Indeterminacy)3.3 E / 1b, e, k; 2a – f (Equivalence and Nonequivalence)3.4 E / 1d, e, f; 2a – f (Consistency and Inconsistency)3.5 E / 1e, f, h; 2a – e (Validity and Invalidity)3.2EEXERCISES1. Construct a full truth-table for each of the following sentences of SL, and state whether the sentence is truth-functionally true, truth-functionally false, or truth-functionally indeterminate.a. ∼ A ⊃ Ac. (A ! ∼ A) ⊃ ∼ (A ! ∼ A)*f. ([(C ⊃ D) & (D ⊃ E)] & C) & ∼ E2. For each of the following sentences, either show that the sentence is truth-functionally true by constructing a full truth-table or show that the sentence is not truth-functionally true by constructing an appropriate shortened truth-table.a. (F ∨ H) ∨ (∼ F ! H) *d. A ! (B ! A)*f. [C ⊃ (C ∨ ∼ D)] ⊃ (C ∨ D)3.3E EXERCISES1. Determine, by constructing full truth-tables, which of the following pairs of sentences of SL are truth-functionally equivalent.*b. A ⊃ (B ⊃ A) (C & ~ C) ∨ (A ⊃ A)e. (G ⊃ F) ⊃ (F ⊃ G) (G ! F) ∨ (~ F ∨ G)k. F ∨ ~ (G ∨ ~ H) (H ! ~ F) ∨ G2. For each of the following pairs of sentences of SL, either show that the sen-tences are truth-functionally equivalent by constructing a full truth-table or show that they are not truth-functionally equivalent by constructing an appro-priate shortened truth-table.a. G ∨ H. ∼ G ⊃ H *f. ∼ (∼ B ∨ (∼ C ∨ ∼ D)) (D ∨ C) & ∼ B 3.4E EXERCISES 1. Construct full truth-tables for each of the following sets of sentences andindicate whether they are truth-functionally consistent or truth-functionally *d. {(A & B) & C, C ∨ (B ∨ A), A ! (B ⊃ C)}e. {( J ⊃ J) ⊃ H, ∼ J, ∼ H}*f. {U ∨ (W & H), W ! (U ∨ H), H ∨ ∼ H}2. For each of the following sets of sentences, either show that the set is truth-functionally consistent by constructing an appropriate shortened truth-table or show that the set is truth-functionally inconsistent by constructing a full truth-table.