I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Assignment: The Characteristics of Organizational Leaders
Bennet was a true asset for the accounts receivables team and for Riverville Medical Center (RMC). The success of the accounts receivable department and the finance division was, in large part, a result of Bennet’s leadership. Higher management at Riverville Medical Center (RMC) knew that with Bennet’s leadership they could create organizational change that would increase efficiency at RMC.
There is more than one way to lead, and there are multiple leadership styles (Byler, 2016). Leaders play a central part in directing organizations toward their goals (Robbins & Judge, 2018). For this Assignment, you will examine key characteristics of leaders and the relationship among personality, traits, power, politics, and leadership. You also will explore how leaders implement change.
References
Byler, B. (2016, August 3) The 4 leadership styles, and how to identify yours. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/08/the-4-leadership-styles-an…
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Visit Personality Club (2019). Do you know your personality type?

Choose two living individuals whom you admire for making change that positively impacts society, and consider how their personality type contributed to their fame and their characteristics, traits, or behaviors that you share with these leaders. Also, consider which characteristics might be dominant in effective leaders, how the personality types of these leaders factored into their success, and if their approaches to leadership were charismatic, authentic, or neither.
To complete this Assignment:

Write a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following:
After conducting research on the Internet, choose two individuals and provide a brief explanation for your selection.
What common characteristics do the individuals you selected share?
Are the characteristics of these leaders based upon traits or behaviors? Explain.
Which do you personally view as dominant in effective leadership, traits, or behaviors? Explain why.
What change did the individuals you selected champion?
How did they go about implementing the change?
What was their approach to leadership: charismatic, authentic, or neither? Explain.
.

3. Should all beliefs require evidence? Answer with reference to Clifford and James.Please submit your paper through Engage, preferably in MS word document form. The place to submit is on Engage, in the ‘Assignment 2: MID TERM Paper’ section. Papers should be 1000-1500 words, 1.5 spaced and in size 12 font. Please note that you need to hit the ‘submit’ button once you’ve uploaded your paper.Guidance on the TaskThis assignment synthesizes the understanding, thinking, critiquing, and creating skills we have been working on so far. You are being asked to answer a question, and to supply a reasoned argument in support of the answer you give. As a result, it is important that you think about how you will structure your paper. Make sure you are clear at the outset about what you are arguing for. In your introductory paragraph give a clear statement of what you are going to conclude as your answer to the question. Then inform the reader how you are going to set about arguing for it. In the main body of the paper, lead your reader through the steps that you are taking. Make sure you are clear about the role that each point you are making plays in your overall argument. It is important that you explain the views you’re discussing clearly and accurately: assume that the person reading the paper does not know anything about the material you are discussing, and explain everything accordingly.You must include detailed discussion of at least one of the works we’ve read and discussed appropriate to your question. And remember: you must indicate where and how you have used sources in the text in your paper. There must be clear distinctions between your words and the words from your sources. Using direct quotations is the best way to do this. You must also include a list of works cited list at the end of your paper after the conclusion.Please also see the additional document about writing philosophy papers, and along with the document on citations, and the document on paper structure. There is also a video on writing a philosophy paper to have a look at, which talks through these documents.A couple of things to remember:1. Please submit your paper by uploading a file, preferably an MS Word one. If you use Google docs, you go to File – Download – Microsoft Word (.docx) to download your Google doc as a word document that you can then upload.2. Remember to click the SUBMIT button – don’t just leave your paper up there as a draft.

Choose a 12-15-page article related to the chapters assigned to you by the professor. Articles must come from an Academic journal on the list provided below. If you need help choosing a journal, you can consult a librarian or UCW writing coach. Before you start working on your article review, you should thoroughly explore the grading rubric at the end of this instruction and clearly identify key elements based on which your work will be assessed.In your Article Review, you should describe the content of the article chosen, identifying key assumptions and conclusions of the authors and giving your opinion on them. The main focus must be on providing a critical analysis of the article, using criteria mentioned in the Part A, B and C of the grading rubric below. Your analysis should lead to a justified conclusion: whether you will recommend this article to your colleagues and classmates or not and why. You also need to briefly assess relevance/applicability of the concepts of the article in both overall business settings and personal work settings.Requirements:●Critical thinking must be demonstrated to get a good markAddress at least four of the categories provided in the grading rubric below: Purpose and Audience, Authority, Accuracy & Reliability, Objectivity, Currency, and Coverage Present the article review to class in no more than 12 minutes. Your Article Review should be at least 1000 words and upload it to TurnitIn on time.Complete an APA reference Submit a copy of the article and the summary via TurnitIn before class begins, on the due date. Anyone that does not upload the summery on the due date will face a regular late penalty of 10%/day. This assignment holds a value of 10% of your final mark.Marks are assigned as per the Grading Rubric in this instruction.Part A (40%) -Provide a brief summary of the important points the author makes (no more than 2-3 slides) about the subject, and give your opinion supported by reasons and the author’s perspective Part B (15%) – Address four of the categories below: Purpose and Audience, Authority, Accuracy & Reliability, Objectivity, Currency, and Coverage Part C – (35%) – Identify the most interesting thing(s) you learned about the article’s subject. How can you use what you have learned at work and in your business career? Why (or why not) would you recommend this article to others?Part D – (10%) – Professionalism, Grammar, Format, Presentation skills, and references

Grade Breakdown: 

Make two responses to your classmates’ posts (just two, not two per person!!!) for full credit!  

Note: This is how all discussions will work: You will make your initial “post,” and then “respond” to two of your colleagues “posts!”  Discussions are worth 50 Points (sometimes more for Two-chapter Weeks).
Your “post” is worth 30 Points, spread evenly across the number of questions, which can change.  Each question is graded for clarity, completion, and correctness.  Your answers must have depth, and they must always be:

Enumerated or labeled 
Academic, College-level writing
In complete sentences!!! (This isn’t middle school…)
Grammatically correct as possible
I am not giving a sentence count, but I see know the way that any question could be “fully” answered in less than 3-5 college-level sentences!

Responses are worth 20 Points (10 points each), and they must directly address the issues and points made in the “post” to which you are responding!  No “Great Job,” “I really like,” or “I wish I would have thought of that.”  That is just silly fluff!  Since this class is solely discussion-based, I need these to be taken seriously.  You read, you right, you discuss… that’s it. 

Discussion: Chapter 23
Read “Voices of Freedom” and answer the three attached questions
Choose and answer one of the following: 

What series of ideological conflicts, security interest, and events brought about by the Cold War? 
Explain the similarities and differences between the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan.

Choose and answer one of the following:

How did the government attempt to shape public opinion during the Cold War? 
How did the Cold War affect civil liberties in the United States? 

Opinion Piece:  Was Harry S. Truman a successful president and why? 
Analyze the Cartoon: EditEdit
the cartoon has to analyzed, whats the purpose of the cartoon? symbolism? 

What series of ideological conflicts, security interest, and events brought about by the Cold War?
Explain the similarities and differences between the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan.

you choose one of these to answer, don’t answer both 

How did the government attempt to shape public opinion during the Cold War?

How did the Cold War affect civil liberties in the United States?

choose one of these to answer, not both
Was Harry S. Truman a successful president and why?answer this question 
and then analyze the cartoon 

 

Before beginning this Art Journal, be sure to view the supplement Web Link That Far Corner – Frank Lloyd Wright in Los Angeles.This documentary focuses on the unsuccessful homes that Frank Lloyd Wright designed while attempting to re-invent himself in Los Angeles in the early 20th century. Time has changed the opinions that once surrounded these homes. In addition, the film digs into some depth regarding what helped to influence the style of these homes. Journal Questions:Describe which home/s or segment/s made strong impressions upon you while watching the film. You are not limited to just one.How did the home/s or segment/s make you feel and/or think of?This film often refers to the homes as being unfriendly and or the product of someone that was disturbed. Do you share the same views? Explain why or why not.Do not go to Google for answers to the questions or supporting information. The journal experience is about you telling me your very own thoughts and opinions while viewing the documentary film.If any portion of your entry is not yours, meaning you used/referred to other sources, your journal entry will receive a zero.Writing your Essay:Write a short essay that answers the above questions and provide comments about your own viewing experience. Quality is better than quantity. Be sure to stay on task. Citing and quoting from the film may prove helpful as does referring to particular time segments (at 12:16 when such and such is mentioned) when the name of the artwork might be in question or to better support your idea. The purpose of this exercise is to promote critical thinking. Be sure to provide detailed and supportive answers.The best method for entering your essays into canvas is to cut and paste them after they have been through spell checking and translating.Points will be distributed in this manner:Original and relevant content (10 points max)- Displaying you have studied and are knowledgeable of the material by writing your own thoughts and feelings regarding the material’s content. A critical analysis (10 points max)- Exhibiting you have engaged with the material by providing original, insightful observations and thought-provoking commentary.Quality of writing (10 points max)- Cleary and concisely articulates ideas and feelings about the material utilizing good sentence fluency (syntax), spelling, and grammar. College-level writing is required.DO NOT use outside sources to help write your journal entry.