3.1a) Conduct a literature search and select one article from a PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL that studies the effect of explanatory style on health (tip: log into the NYMC Health Sciences Library webpage https://guides.library.nymc.edu/remote; click on “ask a librarian” in the upper right for help if you are not familiar with their services: you will have access to subscriptions of peer reviewed journals held by the college).
The article should make some assessment of participants’ explanatory style and imply a connection to a health outcome. Read the article and
1st paragraph: describe your understanding of explanatory style  
2nd paragraph: summarize key findings of the article you chose
3rd paragraph: critique the conclusions and any implications the article makes with identified explanatory styles and observed health outcomes. Present your critique with an objective and scientific point of view.
4th paragraph: share your personal thoughts on the article and your opinion of the relevance of explanatory style in understanding stress and health
You may use the textbook chapter 5 and any additional resources from PEER REVIEWED JOURNALS on PubMed you choose.

names/formulas of compounds, unit conversions for temperature and energy, sig figs, chemical equations (in particular thermochemical equations), stoichiometry (g ↔ mole ↔ energy)Basic equations used that you should know and be able to use in various contexts: q = m c ∆T q = m ∆Hphase and their use in calculations involving heat transfer with or without change of state qa + qb + qc … = 0 in various calorimetry situations (either constant pressure “coffee cup” calorimeter or constant volume bomb calorimeter) where a, b, c represent different components of the system in different applications such asdetermining specific heat capacity of a metal (qmetal + qwater + qcal = 0)determining enthalpy change for reactions such as dissolving ionic substance in water,or chemical reactions such as a metal with an acid.determining heat release per mole of substance in bomb calorimeter∆rH0 = Σ n∆rH0 (products) – Σ n∆rH0 (reactants)Hess’s law ∆rH = ∆rH1 + ∆rH2 + ∆rH3 + This is what it will be about and I have only 2 hours to finish it and don’t worry it’s going to be a multiple choice. and I want it today at anytime before 12 am 3/24/2021

According to the Council on Education for Public Health, public health practitioners ought to be competent in the following areas of health policy:
Discuss multiple dimensions of the policy making process, including the roles of ethics and evidence
Propose strategies to identify stakeholders and build coalitions and partnerships for influencing public health outcomes
Advocate for political, social or economic policies and programs that will improve health in diverse populations
Evaluate policies for their impact on public health and health equity
Given your experience in this course, why are these competency areas important? Which competency areas have we addressed in this course? How do you plan to supplement your learning in this course in order to address these competency areas? Which resources or learning opportunities would you recommend to other emerging public health practitioners in order to gain competency in the areas listed above. Please support your recommendations with ample evidence.

also
Question 1: Compare and contrast, policy initiation and policy modification. 
Question 2: Discuss the concept of incrementalism in public policymaking.

Unit VI BUS 4700, Compensation and Benefits1. Article 2. AssignmentBeller, M. D. (2014). Mandated benefits, good or bad? At N.Y. hearing, reviews are mixed. Insurance Advocate, 125(19), 42– BUS 4700, Compensation and Benefits 343. Retrieved from http://libraryresources.waldorf.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbig&AN=edsbig.A396766770&site=eds-liveAfter reading the article, compose your critique by addressing the items listed below.Explain the main topic/question of the article.Explain and identify mandatory indirect benefits addressed in the article.Discuss factors to consider in determining how to offer and select benefits according to the article.Take what you have learned from the unit and article, and apply the concepts to your life by explaining whether yousupport mandatory indirect benefits and describing how they can affect you.Your critique should be at least two pages in length, not counting the title page and the references page. The critique shouldinclude at least two sources—one being the article and one being another credible source. Be sure that any citations orreferences are in proper APA format.

Visit the website of the Lascaux complex of caves found in southwestern France and filled with some of the world’s most significant Paleolithic art: http://www.lascaux.culture.fr/#/en/00.xml (Links to an external site.)Anthropologists date the site to around 15,000 years B.C.E., almost nine thousand years before the first urban settlement of Sumer. When visiting this website, go to the site map. Read the material found in “The Setting.” Then go on to a tour of the Cave: http://archeologie.culture.fr/lascaux/en/visit-cave/diverticule-felins (Links to an external site.) There are various points where you can study individual sections in more depth. Take notes about the art and cave features.Write an 250-400 word essay describing some of the art and features of the cave. Also, speculate as to how the Paleolithic inhabitants of the Lascaux valley may have used the cave. Do we have anything comparable in the contemporary world that serves a similar function? Your essay should be written formally (showing careful thought and consideration, citing course materials as appropriate, and written using proper grammar, mechanics, punctuation, spelling, etc.).