Analytical Discussion #4Discussion GuidelinesWatch the documentary Prescription Thugs (2016). As part of your discussion, answer the following questions:Compare and contrast the information presented in all four articles.Do you think our society has undergone a cultural shift?Did the documentary give you a different perspective on the pharmaceutical industry?Did the documentary affect how you feel towards the “disease of addiction” and toward addicts?What culpability do we as pharmacists have in proliferating this public health problem?What creative solutions do you propose over and above what has already been implemented?How would you respond to a question posed by a patient who had watched the documentary regarding its accuracy?In addition, discuss the overall “level of evidence” for the conclusions made in all of the materials used in four (4) Analytical Discussions. What do you feel is the most valuable or important results from this type of scientific inquiry? You are encouraged to look at additional current references from the literature (which you must properly cite) to support your points. Limit your initial post to no more than 500 words.

I’m working on a law exercise and need support to help me learn.

Question I – At the end of a long day, Sabrina, a cashier for a supermarket is counting the paper money.  One of the bills falls from the cash register into the bottom of Sabrina’s purse.  What elements of embezzlement are present in this situation?  Should Sabrina be convicted of embezzlement?  Why or why not?
Question II – Bobby Bigmouth is sued for slander by his boss.  Bobby argues that he cannot be sued for slander because he did not publish any statement.  He argues that his alleged slanderous comment was not published because he just made the comment to a co-worker about his boss rather than making that statement to a reporter to be published.  Is Bobby’s argument correct?
Question III – During an episode of Sports Center, one of the anchors misread the teleprompter and said LeBron James was closing his school for at risk youth.  In reality, LeBron James was expanding his school.  This statement by the anchor was a slip of the tongue and corrected in the next episode.  Would LeBron’s defamation suit against Sports Center and the anchor be successful?  Why or why not?

1. In the first learning exercise, you were asked to identify the segment you felt most optimistic about. Explain: (a) how you ended up targeting this segment, (b) whether or not this segment met your expectations, and (c) how you might have improved your efforts at targeting this segment (25%).
2. In looking back on the past ten decisions, recall an instance when your own assessment or recommended course of action differed from someone else’s in your group. Describe: (a) what the two different positions were, (b) what course of action was taken and how that turned out, and (c) what might have been learned from this (25%).
3. Take a moment to reflect upon what you thought about Marketing before this course started and what you think about it now. Identify and explain three ways in which your experience with Markstrat has shifted how you think about Marketing. Though lessons learned about group work and organizational processes are fundamental, do NOT focus on such issues for this assignment. Instead, limit your discussion of lessons learned to topics that are specific to the discipline of marketing (i.e., specific marketing concepts and theories) (50%).

Select one company headquartered in the state of TN for which you would like to work (FedEx), and which does not currently have unionized employees. Assume that you are an employee of this company and interested in starting a union.

Create a scenario of specific working conditions prompting the attention of employees dealing with a global mobile workforce that includes expatriates (safety, terrorism, health, and the challenges in other countries) and repatriates (retention, termination, and job placement) in a multinational organization, with a home based in the United States.
Outline the major benefits of organizing a union for this company.
Create a mission, purpose, and objective statement for a strategic plan to organize a union for this group.
List the steps for starting a union.
Describe 1–2 ideas for each step of the process for starting a union.
Determine a possible timeline for the execution of the union, including your rationale, based on the plan you drafted.
Speculate—based on research, rather than opinion—on two management team objections the union is likely to face.
Develop two arguments to counter management’s position on unions.

Write a 3- to 4-page analysis that addresses the following:Structure your paper to address each of the four below elements. Make each of them a separate heading in your paper.Causes of the events in the caseEthical issues involvedConsequences of the actors’ behaviors in the casePotential solutionsApply the concepts of normative ethics and morality that you have studied to the facts of the case.State your personal opinion concerning the optimum (best) outcome that can be achieved. Support your opinion with the ethical and moral principles you have studied.Paper Format:Use Times New Roman or Arial size 11 or 12 font.Double-space the paper.The paper should be approximately 3–4 pages in length.Include your name, date, and assignment title on each page of the paper. You may use the header function of Microsoft Word to do that.Cases to choose from for this assignment are the following:Case #6, “Starbucks Venti Social Responsibility and Brand Strategy,” pages 387–397Case #8, “New Belgium Brewing: Crafting a Fresh Social Responsibility and Sustainability Initiative,” pages 416–425Case #9, “The NCAA Has Many Balls in the Air,” pages 426–438