solved Discussion: Nye vs. HelgesenOne aspect of successfully communicating your thoughts

Discussion: Nye vs. HelgesenOne aspect of successfully communicating your thoughts within diverse groups is the ability to engage in “friendly” debate. How does this kind of conversation differ from the kind of sparring you may experience on athletic fields or, for some people, at a large holiday gathering? The focus is kept to scholarly inquiry, and personal opinions are de-emphasized. Of course, you can always find a method to express your opinion—just make sure you can find another researcher who has articulated the position you are taking, then argue your point based on research and evidence. Ultimately, the goal is to maintain a respectful forum where diverse ideas can be heard and considered.To prepare for the Nye vs. Helgesen Discussion, review the commentaries of Nye and Helgesen.Helgesen, S. (2008). New sources of power. Leadership Excellence Essentials. 25(5), 6.Nye, J. S., Jr. (2008). Soft power. Leadership Excellence Essentials, 25(4), 10. Then, choose the side that best represents your views on the use of power. Finally, carefully review the Weekly Resources and conduct your own research in the Walden Library (or other reliable resources) so you can illustrate and substantiate your position on appropriate usage of organizational power by citing academic or credible resources.Post a cohesive response to the following: Based on the commentaries of Ny and Helgesen, explain which position was more aligned to your own view on the use of power. Substantiate your position on the use of power with evidence and theories based on the research you conducted. How does your view on the use of power affect leadership practices within an organizational culture? Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources, as well as other credible resources you have read; or what you have observed and experienced.General Guidance: Your original post, due by Day 3, will typically be 1 full single space in length, as a general expectation/estimate. Refer to the Week 3 Discussion 1 Rubric for grading elements and criteria..