solved Each peer review should be no longer than 1 page.

Each peer review should be no longer than 1 page. Please use 12-point font, Times New Roman, 1-inch margins, and single-space. Please electronically submit your proposal by due date. On April 1, you have received two grant proposals from the instructor via email. We will employ a double blind peer review method. This means that the reviewers of the paper won’t get to know the identity of the author, and the author won’t get to know the identity of the reviewer either.Using your knowledge of writing a high-quality grant proposal, please provide your constructive comments on each of the two randomly assigned proposals by highlighting the following components:Needs Assessment (e.g., Has the proposal clearly described a population and their needs? Has it targeted or developed services to specific populations?)Program Goals/Objectives Statements (e.g., Clarity of the author’s desired ‘end state’ or outcome or an ideal situation or condition, Presentation of objectives that collectively achieve the goal)Program Description (e.g., addition of specific activities to the objectives)Program Budget & Budget Justification (e.g., Does the proposed budget make good sense? Are the rationales for justification sufficient and convincing?)Program Evaluation (e.g., Clarity of evaluation plan, use of future tense)Submission Instructions: Please complete your peer review for each of the two proposals in two separate Word documents. Please use this format for each review’s file name: #xx.REVIEW.docx [e.g., #3.REVIEW.docx] The number must match the file name of the original proposal that you received from the instructor.Please upload the two separate Word files saved in the file name format above to this Assignment tab. Rubric (15 pts x 2 proposals; 30 pts in total):Needs assessment:4 points1 goal & 3 objective statements: 3 pointsProgram description: 4 pointsBudget section: 2 pointsEvaluation plan: 2 points