solved In a persuasive essay that is unified, coherent, and fully

In a persuasive essay that is unified, coherent, and fully supported by research, defend or refute ONE of the statements below. Your response must reach a minimum length of1500 words, not including the Works Cited page. 

Defend or Refute: Vaccinations are a safe and effective way to end the Covid-19 pandemic.
Defend or Refute: El Camino made the right call in keeping most of its classes online for the fall ’21 semester. 
Defend or Refute: The recent verdict in the George Floyd murder case indicates that bigotry and violence directed at people of color is finally on the decline.

SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
The ECC English Department requires a 4-5 page essay (not including the Works Cited page, which doesn’t count toward the length requirement). In the essay, do the following:
1. Express a critical viewpoint and develop an original thesis-driven argument. This argumentative essay will be well organized, demonstrate an ability to support a claim using analysis and elements of argumentation, and integrate academically acceptable sources
2. Use at least three sources; avoid over-relying on one source for most of the information; cite multiple sources and synthesize the information found in them.
3. Address issues of bias, credibility, and relevance in the sources you use. Better yet, avoid using biased sources or sources that lack credibility or relevance.
4. Demonstrate, by using at least one of these approaches, an understanding of analytical methods and structural concepts such as inductive and deductive reasoning, and/or cause and effect, and/or ethos, logos, and pathos, and/or the recognition of fallacies in language and thought. (Note: Don’t overthink this English Department requirement; you do NOT have to use all of these methods, and you do NOT have to mention any of them or even use them consciously. If you simply conduct a good argument, you’ll be using a few of them.) 
5. Acknowledge and directly address counterarguments, dealing with them by respectful, effective use of concession and/or refutation.