solved The three essays you may choose to compare/ contrast to

The three essays you may choose to compare/ contrast to ” How Junk Food Can End Obesity” by David H. Freedman, pp, 75 – 95 include the following: 1. ” The Least Deadly Catch: Ocean Farming in the Climate Change Era” by Bren Smith, pp. 270-277. Food Matters: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Third Edition.2. ” Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald L. Bartlett and James B. Steele, pp. 165 – 175. Food Matters: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Third Edition. 3. ” You Can’t Run Away on Harvest Day,” by Barbara Kingsolver, pp. 150 – 159, Food Matters: A Bedford Spotlight Reader. Third Edition. 1. Paragraph One: In David H. Freedman’s , ” How Junk Food Can End Obesity.” Freedman argues a contrarian argument about the benefits and affordability of junk food people buy at fast food restaurants. How does he support this claim? What areas including health and socioeconomics does this article bring to light? What kinds of rhetorical strategies are used, and how does Freedman use the logical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos to move his argument forward? ( Paragraph One) 2. Paragraph Two: Compare or contrast Freedman’s position on food with another scholar’s position/ research into this topic. Use one of the three other authors of the articles noted in this assignment. Who has the best definition on what healthy food and socioeconomic/ philosophical definitions of the necessity of food, and the different types of food available to humans? Then, whose assertions do you think has the most validity? What kind of logical appeals and rhetorical strategies did the writers of the two articles use to compel you to make a decision on the best definition of what makes people make the food choices they do ? ( Write one paragraph ( or more if you need to) in order to justify your explanation. Use author’s names, titles of essays, and the pages you are referring to whether you quote or paraphrase or summarize your explanation). ( Paragraph 2)two paragraph required