solved Question 1: A) Discuss how an organization’s diversity strategy can

/in /by

Question 1:
A) Discuss how an organization’s diversity strategy can support the business strategy. Provide at least three specific examples and explain why and how they support organizational success. 
B) Consider the organization you work for or one you have worked for in the past and evaluate the diversity program.  How was it effective and how did it support the strategic goals of the organization? If it was not effective, explain what factors made it ineffective.
Question 2:
Some organizations follow a lengthy, complex selection process, whereas in other organizations the process may be more streamlined. Some may view the longer and more complex selection process to be more valid. 
A) What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a lengthier process versus a more streamlined (shorter) one?  Consider the perspectives of both the job seekers and the organization and the tradeoffs between efficiency and effectiveness.  As a job seeker, what process would you prefer to follow and why? 
B) Consider the selection process for an organization where you were ultimately hired.  How would you describe the process from a candidate perspective?  Do you believe it was effective? Why or why not?  
Question 3:
A) Why is retention such a major focus for human resource managers? How does focusing on retention add strategic value to the organization? 
B) How would you go about developing an employee retention program for your organization?
Be specific in terms of what steps you would you take. 
What might be your biggest challenge and why?
What type of metrics would you need to obtain? Discuss at least two. Why did you select these metrics?
Question 4:
A) What is the difference between job satisfaction and employee engagement? How are motivation and employee engagement related to employee retention?  What factors (personal, organizational) might contribute to job satisfaction and engagement? Explain your answers.
B) Think about a job where you have been employed for many years.
Evaluate your level of satisfaction versus engagement.
What factors influenced your job satisfaction
What was your level of engagement in your work?  What factors influenced this?
What factors influenced your retention and why?
C) Consider a job where you had a shorter tenure.  What factors contributed to your resignation and what factors could have made you stay?  Which (if any) were within the organization’s control?

solved Your company, JMS Gum Oil Co. (“JMS”), manufactures an oil

/in /by

Your company, JMS Gum Oil Co. (“JMS”), manufactures an oil for a specific industrial use at several manufacturing facilities it owns and operates in Tennessee.  The manufacturing of this oil entails a process known colloquially as “heaping,” in which workers place heated filaments in a chamber into which they pour industrial solvent. Heaping has been used for years, and OSHA has regulated the process throughout.  In fact, OSHA has not sought to amend its regulations of heaping or to promulgate new regulations in the past ten years.
OSHA officials have recently insinuated at industry conferences that the agency will soon seek to alter its regulation of heaping.  Specifically, OSHA will seek to impose new standards on how hot the filaments may be and on the industrial solvents that may be used.  Industrial accidents in which workers involved in heaping suffered serious injuries from extremely hot filaments and from inhaling fumes from the solvents used apparently led OSHA to consider these new standards.
After reviewing the science, you conclude that the science regarding the necessity and efficacy of the new proposed regulations is conflicted.  Notwithstanding the accidents that prompted OSHA to consider action, the bulk of the peer-reviewed studies concerning the dangers to workers posed by extremely hot filaments and by industrial solvents in heaping have concluded that current standards suffice to protect workers.  Further, the current standards have been in effect for ten years, with few accidents except for the recent, high-profile ones.  Finally, new regulations to these effects could seriously harm JMS’s profitability. 
Discussion Points

Assume JMS opposes new standards applicable to heaping. How can and should JMS oppose such potential standards?

What steps must take place before the possible regulations OSHA officials mentioned can become law?
For each of these steps, how can JMS oppose OSHA?

Are there any drawbacks to opposing the OSHA action?

Assume that, despite JMS’s objections, OSHA promulgates new standards for heaping. Also assume that JMS considers these standards illegal.

How should JMS proceed if it concludes that these standards are illegal?
Assume that JMS is cited by OSHA for violation of the new standards and that JMS decides to contest the legality of said regulations in court. What will JMS need to prove to establish that these standards are illegal?

solved I’m working on a english discussion question and need an

/in /by

I’m working on a english discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Read “The Price of Black Ambition” (Links to an external site.) by Roxane Gay. While reading, be sure to note the various elements of memoir Gay uses in her piece. For example, does she use all five senses in her descriptions? Is there a clear plot with a conflict for the main character (the author) to overcome? What is the theme of this piece?
In this discussion, write several paragraphs analyzing this memoir. First, briefly describe the rhetorical situation:

Author: Who wrote this? What do we know about the author that could have influenced how they wrote this piece or how they approached this memoir?
Audience: Who is the audience for this piece? What do you know about the assumptions or biases they might bring to their reading? How can you tell? Did the author manage to reach the audience? Why or why not?
Context: Where was it published? When was it published? What current events might the author have been responding to here? How did this impact the way the author wrote this memoir?
Purpose: Why did the author write this? Did it work? Was the purpose achieved?

Second, summarize the narrative essay and examine the elements of memoir used in this piece. Use textual examples with in-text citations to support your assertions. Pay close attention to elements like:

Plot and conflict
Description (five senses)
Theme or lessons learned

Lastly, write a brief paragraph that sums up your analysis of this piece and describe how reading this piece might help you write your own memoir. 
Responses to Classmates
This discussion also requires that you respond to at least two classmates. In your response consider commenting on your classmates’ analysis. What did you find interesting about it? Do you agree with their observations? What questions do you have about their analysis?
You can also use the RISE model (Links to an external site.) when you respond:

Reflect: What do you agree/disagree with in your peer’s post?
Inquire: Ask an insightful question about your peer’s post.
Suggest: Make a kind suggestion to your peer or make an insightful comment that will help them better understand rhetoric.
Elevate: Offer an additional resource your peer might find helpful, or make connections between your post and your peer’s post.  Elevate the conversation by providing information that will be helpful in the future.

solved I need you to answer the following questions for me

/in /by

I need you to answer the following questions for me please:1. Recreate the transactional model of communication. Please make sure that you properly label and describe each of the elements in this model. This means that you will have properly labeled each element and offered a brief description of each of the elements in writing to the side to demonstrate your understanding of each element as it functions in this model to capture the communication process. A.Which elements of the transactional model of communication are IMPACTED the most because of culture? How are they IMPACTED by culture? How does this shape intercultural communication? Please be specific and give at least one example that illustrates the importance and IMPACT this factor(s) has on your communication.2. Explain and describe what is culture is A.With the models we have used in class to discuss culture? Describe these models briefly. How have these models offered insight into the complex concept and practice of culture? B. In what ways has your AWARENESS and UNDERSTANDING of culture changed over the course of the semester? C.What, if any, has been the IMPACT on you as an individual and a communicator by this deepened understanding of culture?3. In what ways, if any, have you become more AWARE of your identities through this course? A.Please recognize and briefly describe the different identities that we discussed this semester.B.How have your UNDERSTANDINGS of identity, and your identities specifically, changed/shifted/morphed because of the concepts, issues, and other ideas we have talked about over the course of the semester?C.In what ways do you believe, if at all, this class will impact/has impacted your UNDERSTANDING of self and other? D.How will you talk about identity now and UNDERSTAND the identities of others after this course?4. How does a person’s worldview influence their perceptions of the world? What are some of the major influences that work to shape a person’sworldview? How does these worldviews identify, treat, and understand cultural others? How does worldview then impactintercultural communication?- In this paragraph use examples of:A.Kohls’ American ValuesB.Schwartz’ Basic Value Theory (Six Characteristics of Values and Ten Basic Human Values)C.Hofstede’s Value DimensionsD.Hall’s Time OrientationsE.Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Value Orientation TheoryF.Ontological and Epistemological WorldviewsG.Religion

solved Biblical Theology Paper: Final Assignment Instructions Overview The Biblical Theology

/in /by

Biblical Theology Paper: Final Assignment Instructions Overview The Biblical Theology Paper is a research-based paper in current Turabian format, focusing on a biblical theology. The intent is to connect leadership with theology. Continuing from the Biblical Theology Paper Assignment: Proposal, the student will show how the biblical/theological foundation of [your chosen theology] form and inform leadership in the following 8 areas: metaphysical (reality), epistemology (knowledge), axiology (values), purpose (meaning), role of the leader, role of the follower, leadership methodology, and setting? Instructions The student will write a 10–12 page research-based paper in current Turabian style (see Writing Style Guide). This paper must include a Title Page with a unique title, using the Sample Title Page template. The paper must have an explanation of the theology, thesis statement (from the Proposal), headings, and page numbers. The paper must include at least 8 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible with proper Turabian citations preferably in footnotes and a Bibliography. The paper will address the areas listed below: Eight (8) areas of consideration: metaphysical: A division of philosophy that is concerned with the fundamental nature of reality and being and that includes ontology, cosmology, and often epistemology. Address: How the reality of this theology would aid in forming and informing the leader? epistemology: The study or a theory of the nature and grounds of knowledge especially with reference to its limits and validity. Address: How the knowledge of this theology would aid in forming and informing the leader? axiology: The study of the nature, types, and criteria of values and of value judgments especially in ethics. Address: How valuable is this theology would aid in forming and informing the leader? purpose: Something set up as an object or end to be attained :intention, resolution, determination. Address: How the significance of this theology would aid in forming and informing the leader? role of the leader: How this theology is beneficial to the leader as he/she leads? role of the follower: How this theology benefits the leader in leading others? leadership methodology: How this theology effects the practice (best practices) of the leader by informing how to lead? setting: How should the theology practiced in daily life as leader?

solved Read chapter 3, watch Week 6 Lecture, and watch the

/in /by

Read chapter 3, watch Week 6 Lecture, and watch the films “Gone Baby Gone” and “Sleepers”. You can rent these movies in YouTube for $2.99
Pick one movie and apply Kant’s moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. For “Gone Baby Gone” judge Patrick’s final decision and for “Sleepers” judge the priest’s final decision. Judging any other action in the movie is an automatic zero. 500 words minimum in MLA/APA format.
*You must apply Kant’s 3 premises (week 6 folder) for 50 points and Michael Sandel’s 3 contrasts (Week 6 Folder Lecture: Mind your Motive)

Kant’s Three Premises Explained
In the case of ” Gone Baby Gone” the philosophical process you will follow in this paper should sound as something like this:
According to Kant’s first premise Patrick behaved moral because he returned the victim he was hired to find and without condition this is the “right” conduct for any detective in cases of kidnapping (the “First Maxim”). Here Kant speaks of doing the right prior to good.
2. On Kant’s second premise Patrick acted moral because he respected the dignity of Amanda and he treated her as an end in herself and not as means to an end like everyone else was doing in the film (the “Second Maxim”). Here Kant speaks of humans as special creatures and ends in themselves. Humans are ends, not means to an end. Los seres humanos son un fin, no un medio para un fin.
3. The conclusion is that a detective act morally when he reports a kidnapping to the police and this behavior should establish a universal law governing all detectives in cases of kidnapping (the “Third Maxim”). Here Kant asks us to test the universality of our action. Will it be OK if everyone does what I am about to do?
Please let me know if you have further questions.

Kant’s Three Premises
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Nature of the concept
The concept of the categorical imperative is a syllogism
1.The first premise is that a person acts morally if his or her conduct would, without condition, be the “right” conduct for any person in similar circumstances (the “First Maxim”).
2.The second premise is that conduct is “right” if it treats others as ends in themselves and not as means to an end (the “Second Maxim”).
3.The conclusion is that a person acts morally when he or she acts as if his or her conduct was establishing a universal law governing others in similar circumstances (the “Third Maxim”).

solved In the book Door to Door, Edward Humes explores what

/in /by

In the book Door to Door, Edward Humes explores what he calls the “magnificent, maddening, and mysterious world of transportation.” The book gives the reader a behind the scenes look at various modes of transportation. More important for our purposes, Humes discusses a variety of characteristics that are shared amongst the modes. Your task in this essay assignment is to identify and discuss seven (7) specific characteristics explored in the book. More specifically, your discussion of each characteristic should focus on how it can be used to evaluate and compare different modes of transportation.Let’s look at an example that is not explicitly discussed in the book (hence one that you should not use). If you chose noise as one of your characteristics, you would describe how this characteristic is discussed in the book. How is it measured? How do the modes compare in terms of noise? What are the challenges for resolving the issue of noise? What are the prospects for mitigating the negative impact of transportation noise in the future?Begin your essay with an introductory paragraph that identifies the seven characteristics you are going to discuss and gives the reader a sense of how you plan to discuss them.Your essay must be no less than 5 double-spaced pages and no more than 6 double-spaced pages of 12 pt. text with one-inch margins all around. Do not include a separate title page. Be sure to include your name, the course number, and the date in single-spaced format in the upper left-hand corner of the first page. Provide a descriptive title for your essay centered on the first page. Do not include a running head but do include page numbers centered at the bottom of each page. Save your document using the appropriate filename syntax noted in the course syllabus.Important note: Do not quote from the book. The essay should be your own writing about the characteristics with support from examples mentioned in the book.You do not need to do research for this essay. Your discussion of the seven characteristics should rely on the assigned book and should refer explicitly to specific examples and information from the book using the following format. If, for example, you were discussing how Domino’s Pizza makes pizza dough, you would include the page number from the book as a point of reference (p. 138). You do not need APA-formatted citations for this essay since all the material is from Door to Door

solved This assignment provides an opportunity to apply psychological theory in

/in /by

This assignment provides an opportunity to apply psychological theory in the exploration of a book or film. Choose a film or book of special interest. The book or film should have content that can be meaningfully explored through application of psychological theory and research. You may want to look at some of the later sections in the course that deal with emotion, motivation, personality, the development of the individual over the life span, health and stress, and psychological disorders and treatment, so that you have a more complete idea of different concepts that might apply.
This paragraph provides you with some example topics and guidelines to help you consider how to approach this task. First, you could pick a movie or book in which the main character suffers from a psychological disorder or is merely trying to cope with the everyday stress of life. In doing so, you could discuss defense mechanisms or refer to developmental stages in the person’s life that might have been important, or consider the effects of abuse, alcoholism and addiction, etc. Or you could approach the subject matter from different perspectives—psychoanalytical, biological, behavioral, cognitive, and/or sociocultural. Additionally, you could discuss the role emotion, memory, or motivation plays in the character’s development, or the importance of the environment, and influences such as racism and sexism. A sample paper is provided as well to guide you in content, formatting, organizing, and writing your paper. This is only a sample and you should not use any content from this sample directly in your paper.
This is a research-based paper, and the film or book provides only the backdrop for research on a psychological topic. You should use at least two psychological, peer-reviewed references (textbook can be used but does not count towards the peer-reviewed references required). The paper should be 1,200 to 1,500 words, about 5 double-spaced pages. The final paper portion of the assignment is worth 65 points and will be graded according to the attached rubric. This assignment will be reviewed by Turnitin and generate a similarity report upon submission to LEO. A new similarity report will be generated every time you upload the assignment until the due date. Please use this similarity report to improve your paper as plagiarism will NOT be tolerated. Please see my instructions on using Turnitin for additional information.

solved Help me study for my Writing class. I’m stuck and

/in /by

Help me study for my Writing class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Outcome 1: Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to produce a formal research paper that is explanatory, analytical, or persuasive.
Objectives
1. Structure an argumentative essay using evidence and refuting the arguments of the opposition. AND/OR Clarify technical, scientific, professional subject matter for an unspecialized audience, developing persuasive reports and proposals that are lucid, effectively arranged, professionally precise, and accurate, that smoothly integrate statistical and graphic information into the written reports and proposals, and that competently research and document scientific, technical, and professional material.
2. Include sufficient development of the subject so that targeted audiences can understand the report.
3. Use appropriate types of support and arrange theses in their most logical position.
4. Maintain a tone appropriate to the targeted audience.
5. Arrange main points effectively.
6. Locate appropriate source materials for the major report.
7. Support main points with primary and secondary evidence or both.

What did you already know about writing prior to this course? What were your previous educational experiences? In what ways was this experience similar or different to previous ones?
Now that the course is over, what are your overall impressions or reactions to the course? To what extent was your learning experience positive or negative?
What did you learn about writing from this course? About online education? About college courses overall?
How did you approach this course? Were your approaches successful? Why or why not?
What surprised you about this course? What were the most powerful learning moments, and what made them so?
What were the most challenging moments in this course and what made them so? How did you overcome these challenges?
What was the most important thing you learned about yourself in this course? What learning experiences will be most applicable to your life moving forward?
What connections can you make between your prior knowledge about writing and the knowledge you gained in this course?
What do you think you will do similarly in courses moving forward? What will you do differently or improve upon?
How might you have better supported your classmates in this course? What can you improve upon for future courses?
ANSWERS SHOULD BE 250-260 WORDS 

solved Part 1Dating apps, such as Eharmony, use the Big Five

/in /by

Part 1Dating apps, such as Eharmony, use the Big Five personality traits to match people based on “compatibility.” This leads to some interesting questions regarding how these apps determine what would make people with varying traits more or less compatible. For instance, if a person scored higher in neuroticism, do you think that they should be matched with someone who is also more neurotic (who could potentially understand them better) or someone who is less neurotic (who may be able to provide some calming influence)?For this discussion post, please consider what you think would make for more ideal and satisfying partnerships (in either friendships and/or romantic relationships) in terms of each of the Big Five characteristics. You may consider what you are drawn to in your own life with your individual personality. Sample statement: “If a person is low in openness to experience, I think they would be better matched with someone who is (high or low) in this trait, because…”Your original comment should answer the above questions for each of the following Big Five traits: (1) Openness to Experience, (2) Conscientiousness, (3) Extraversion, (4) Agreeableness, and (5) Neuroticism. Provide a rationale for each of your decisions.Respond to at least two of your peers’ posts. Your peer comment should be substantive and informative. Part 21. Please watch this video by Gottman, which explains his four horsemen:Gottman’s Four Horsemen (Links to an external site.)Minimize VideoReflect on the video and answer one or both of the following questions:Is there one or more particular characteristic that you feel is more personally damaging? What are some of the things in a relationship (either friendship or romantic) that you feel can be destructive that future research may or may not be picking up on?2. What do you personally most value in relationships with others (e.g., trust, active listening, loyalty, friendship, equity, etc.)? For example, what positive characteristics would/do you seek out in others or that you find personally appealing and enriching?**We focused on the Big Five personality traits in the previous chapter. Thus, for this complimentary discussion post, I’d like you to focus on the social aspects of relationships.**Your original comment should include an answer to both #1 and #2 above. Respond to at least two of your peers’ posts. Your peer comment should be substantive and informative.