Gina is the charge nurse of the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift on the acute care unit where you have worked for 18 months since your graduation. Your supervisor has asked you if you would like to learn the duties of the relief charge nurse. You were thrilled that she approached you for this position. Because it was a relief position, it was permissible for your supervisor to appoint you and not necessary for you to formally apply for the position.
One day each week, for the last 2 weeks, you have been working with Gina about the responsibilities of the position. There are several things Gina does that bother you, and you are not sure what you should do. For example, if used supplies were inadvertently not charged to patients at the time of service, Gina admitted she would just charge them to whoever patients she thought were likely to have used them. When you questioned Gina about this, she said, “Well, at the end of the day, the unit needs to make sure that all supplies have been charged for, or the CFO will be after all of us. It is one of the charge nurses’ responsibilities, and I don’t have time to chase everyone down to find the correct patient to charge and besides everyone has insurance and so it does not come out of the patient’s pocket. Most importantly, we must make sure the hospital gets reimbursed or we won’t have our jobs.”
In addition, when Gina does the staffing correlation for the upcoming shift, you notice that she fudges a bit and makes sure the night shift is given credit for needing more staff than they need. When questioned, she said, “Oh, we have to take care of each other, better too much staff than not enough.”
You think Gina’s actions are unethical, but you do not know what to do about it. It does not directly harm a patient, but you feel uncomfortable about what she is doing and feel it is not the ethical thing to do.
DQ: You have many options here including doing nothing. Using the MORAL ethical problem-solving model, solve this case and compare your solution with others in the class while responding to them throughout the week.

I’m studying for my Writing class and need an explanation.

Discussion 4 – Is there a God by the argument of reason, not by faith?PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION belongs technically to a branch of philosophy called METAPHYSICS (Beyond Physics/ the problem of immaterial being), often called THEODICY, a justification of the EXISTENCE OF GOD in the face of ATHEISM and the PROBLEM OF EVIL in the world. Our Study in this unit will focus only on the PROBLEM OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD and the PROBLEM OF EVIL.Resources:Article: Is there a God? By Marilyn Adamson. (Links to an external site.)Videos:Video: The Problem of AtheismVideo: Proving God’s existenceVideo: The Problem of EvilDiscussion Question to Answer:Develop 4 paragraphs in your posts based on the guide questions below.a. In the video, Atheists Delusion, what are the central arguments of people who do not believe in the existence of God? What do you think is the best argument to use in finding God’s existence? The narrator argued on “common-sense” instead of “evidence” with regard to God’s existence. Is that a valid argument? Why? Is “evidence” impossible to prove God’s existence? (Your knowledge in epistemology about evidence can help understand this question). Explain your answers:b. In the video “Proving God’s existence” by TrueTube, explain this statement: “Personal testimony can never be reliable evidence for God’s existence”. Why? Is the testimony of religious experiences of people in the community a better argument than personal experiences as a basis for belief in God? Explain.c. Read the article by Marilyn Adamson a former atheist “Is there a God”. Enumerate and explain in a sentence or two each of the 3 possible proofs and evidence that Ms. Adamson used to argue God’s existence outside the Bible? d. In the video of The problem of evil by wireless philosophy, do you think that the evidential (obvious) aspects of the problem of evil pose the greatest challenge to belief in God’s existence? Do you agree with this view? When evil is experienced around us, does that mean there is no God as well? Argue and explain.

Answer the following question in a coherent response of 300-400 words. You should refer to specific points in the article to illustrate and support the claims you make in your answer. The assignment is due on Canvas by 11:59 pm on Wednesday, April 21st.In his chapter “The Exhilarating Depression of Franklin Roosevelt,” the journalist Robert Bendiner acknowledges that hard economic times continued in the U.S. after Franklin Roosevelt became President, but argues nonetheless that the national mood changed to one of hope and optimism once FDR took office. Why did the national mood change? How did Roosevelt’s style of leadership help bring about this change? What specific steps did his administration take to restore the confidence of the American people and to improve Americans’ quality of life?Organize your essay into four sections. 1) An introductory paragraph that gives your overall answer to the question — introducing your reader to the case you will make in the next two paragraphs for why the national mood changed.2) A second section that could be one or more paragraphs that focuses on Roosevelt’s style of leadership. Cite specific aspects of his personality, approach, and communication skills and explain how they helped produce a change in the national mood from one of despair to one of hope.3) A third section that could be one or more paragraphs that focuses on specific steps the Roosevelt administration took to improve conditions for the average American. These “steps” are policies — laws, executive orders, etc. — that brought changes to the daily lives of Americans. Explain how the changes these policies brought about contributed to changing the mood of the people for the better.4) A brief concluding paragraph that DOES NOT repeat or summarize what you have already written, but rather ties everything together in a conise manner. You can imagine your conclusion as completing this sentence: “If you take nothing else away from what I’ve written, at least remember this….” Your conclusion is what follows “remember this…” It need not be more than 2-3 sentences.

Implement leadership strategies for managing group and team dynamics.Transferable Skill(s)Diversity and TeamworkScenarioYou are the Director of Human Resources, and you are attending a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) summit to enhance leadership strategies. You have three scenarios to review and, using leadership strategies, summarize how to address and resolve the issue.You have two employees that cannot work together, and due to their disagreements and poor communication, it has disrupted the team. One employee says the other employee is “angry, loud, ineffective, and unintelligent”, while the other is citing a possible “dislike” and “unwillingness” to work together due to “their beliefs.”You have a female team member that has just reviewed their annual evaluation, and they noticed their score is lower than their counterpart, who happens to be a male. The female team member is aware that the male coworker has several documented work infractions (late to work, absentees, slow or late work, etc.), but he has received a pay increase, whereas the female employee has not. As both of their supervisors, the female team member has approached you with questions.It has come to your attention that political discourse has become a big distraction in the workplace, and it is impacting productivity and employee morale. A group of individuals continued to carry on group discussion in the workplace and was overheard trying to organize a political demonstration on work time and premises. The group said they all want to wear specific political stated masks during working hours. The company has already put out a memo to cease all political conversation while at or on work grounds. As a manager, you know that your team worked very well, “like family,” before the political talks.InstructionsAs part of the DEI Summit training exercise, you have been given a worksheet to complete for each of these scenarios. Specific questions have been provided, as well as an area for additional information you would like to add. Download and complete the DEI Summit training exercise form below.

Summarize the passage provided using a well-organized paragraph structure.IntroductionSummary is a vital skill that you will use often as you progress through your doctoral program. Summarizing a passage provides an opportunity for you to review the basics of academic writing, organization, and sentence structure.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Address assessment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.Summarize a passage with appropriate structure as shown in the MEAL Plan.Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.Employ appropriate scholarly voice in written work.InstructionsNote: The assessments in this course must be completed in the order presented; subsequent assessments should be built on both your earlier work and your instructor’s feedback on earlier assessments. If you choose to submit assessments prematurely, without considering and integrating your instructor’s feedback, your assessment may be returned ungraded, resulting in your loss of an assessment attempt.Review the passage provided in Assessment 2 Passage [PDF], and summarize it into your own words. Use the MEAL Plan. Label the parts of the paragraph appropriately by placing the letters (M, E, A, L) before the respective parts. The summary should be in your own words and should not include quotes. The summary should capture the key ideas presented in the original text, focusing less on the details. This skill will be important for you when you create your project charter, which must be written professionally, yet succinctly.Your summary will be graded using the following scoring guide criteria:Summarize a passage with appropriate structure as shown in the MEAL Plan.Produce text with minimal grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.Write using an appropriate scholarly tone in a succinct and professional manner