IntroductionIn 2012, Psychologist Heather Butler studied the importance that critical thinking plays in our everyday lives. “Critical thinking is not just the new buzzword in education. Critical thinking involves real outcomes that can be measured, predicted, and—perhaps for the negative life events—avoided” (Butler, 2012, p. 725).In 2013, studies by Grossmann, Varnum, Kitayama, and Nisbett concluded that wise reasoning, rather than intelligence, was a predictor of well-being. In 2017, Dr. Butler and her colleagues, referencing the Grossmann study and based on their own research, determined that the ability to think critically was a better predictor of effective life decisions than was intelligence (Butler, Pentoney, & Bong, 2017).Initial Post InstructionsFor the initial post, address the following:Do you agree that wisdom/critical thinking is a better predictor of well-being than intelligence? To answer, you will have to define what the following terms mean for you:Critical thinkingWisdomIntelligenceWell-beingReflect on what you read in the text this week. Think of the people you know.Are the good people smart?Are the smart people good?How do you define “good”? How do you define “smart”?Can we use our intelligence to become “good”? If yes, how? If no, why not?1apa cited resource

Learning Goal: I’m working on a psychology question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.Part II of AI Hypothetical StrikeResource: Automotive Inc. Case StudyRefer back to what you learned in PS390: Intro to Industrial and Organizational Psychology about training and development, recruitment and appraisals. Approach this assignment as an industrial and organizational psychology professional that is to advise and help the management and employees at AI following the hypothetical strike.For Part II of your case study, you will examine the training needs of the AI employees. You will write a 3–4-page expository essay (excluding cover page and reference page) that looks at the employee needs due to job relocation, hiring new employees and employee challenges.Include the following in your essay:Identify training needs for front-line supervisors and employees.Describe the goals and objectives of the training you identified.Consider the impacts and needs of employees who have had to relocate due factory or division closures.Consider the impacts and needs of employees who have been impacted by a new influx of employees into factories or divisions that are still operational.Provide the pros and cons for creating a gateway for temporary employees to become permanent employees.

Please read The Below FirstI’m looking for someone who does not use Chegg or Course Hero or any online cites to provide your answers. The professor checks these other sites as well. If you do this to provide your answers and don’t use your own, let me know immediately so I can choose someone else to assist me. I have been notified that an assignment was linked to Chegg or Course Heroetc.Someone that uses their own words, so nothing can be found on the internet.Someone who does not Plagiarize others work from online websites.I have word documents attached with the instructions.Then let me know. Thank you.Subjects are:Criminal JusticeText books that are used for this class: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th EditionISBN-13: 978-1452242569Reference:Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.Your answers will be original?The professor or anyone will not be able find these answers on any online website?Please answer:1. Read all the instructions and let me know if you have any questions about what must be done.2. Your answers will be all original?3. Do you guarantee that all your work is original and none of what you write can or will be found on any online site?Therefore, I try to provide a longer time for the work to be completed.

Please watch the video then answer the question.Andrew Jackson’s brand of government was very different from those leaders who came before him. What made him different? What was the appeal? What parallels can you draw from the Jacksonian “era” to our former presidential administration?Answer the question and remember to follow all discussion guidelines per the syllabus.10 points: The discussion posting demonstrates excellent understanding of the material by completely answering the entire discussion question, and considers the implications of the question. Posting gives thoughtful analysis. Posting has excellent synthesis of material with proper citation where appropriate.8-9 points: Posting demonstrates an above average understanding of the material by completely answering entire discussion question. The posting gives good analysis. Posting attempts to synthesize materialwith proper citation where appropriate.6-7 points: Discussion posting only answers the question by doing the bare minimum required. Offers little to no analysis.4-5 points: Discussion posting is below average. Does not meet the minimum requirements. No analysis, nor synthesis.1-3 points: Posting is an attempt to merely complete the assignment. Summation or regurgitation ofthe reading and/or other students’ posts.

write a compare and contrast short essay about The Emperor Triumphant and The Justinian Mosaic. The comparison essay should answer the question, “How are objects similar?” and “How are objects different?” The key to a good compare and contrast essay is to organize the sentences by theme where both works of art are discussed all the way through. What are the themes? You can choose any of the formal qualities – such as style, material, size, use of line, etc. that you already read about in Assignment #6 (Week 1 Module). You also should include a discussion of the objects’ functions and meanings. So what was the object used for? who used it? where was it originally located? who was supposed to see or not see the works?The essay should be at least two pages in length, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12 point font, 1 inch margins. **Remember, the most important thing is to discuss the works together. So for example, if you make a point that the subject matter is similar – you need to explain why that is important and talk about both works together. Or if the subject matter is different – why is it different? what is being portrayed in each work? Here are the links that will help you compare and contrast the two:https://smarthistory.org/barberini-ivoryhttps://smarthistory.org/san-vitale/