You will develop a strategy for new customer acquisition by using highly segmented and targeted direct marketing programs aimed at those prospects that are most likely to buy. Create and explain the following: a) A fictitious event that your group would develop/book b) Suitable fictitious public assembly facility such as an arena, stadium, theater or amphitheater * You may/should use an existing event and facility as a model for the assignment. c) Describe the actual market (state, city, population, demographics, climate and facility site) and support your location selection with verifiable market analysis. d) Create 3 strategies to attract new customers for your event by using highly segmented and targeted direct marketing programs to market your event. Example: The Providence Bruins attract young fans to build their base by using on-ice games for youth hockey organizations. Through e-mail marketing, direct mail and telephone sales to youth hockey organizations and coaches the PBruins promote the idea of their team playing on the ice either before or between periods of the game. Their goal is to reach the 6-14 year old and 25-55 (their parents) demographic. All participants and attendees must purchase a ticket ($20.00 value).

Benchmark – Implicit Association TestsundefinedundefinedTake one (gender, age, race, sexuality, disability, or weight) of the Implicit Association Tests (IAT) at the Harvard University website. In 750-1,000 words, address the following: (APA 7th edition formatting of work is required)undefinedExamine how attitude is formed.Discuss how personal implicit biases can form understandings at a local, national or global level.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the IAT as a research tool.Reflect on your personal results from the IAT.undefinedUse three to five scholarly sources to support your thinking, use textbook as one of the resources. Textbook: Branscome, N.R., & Baron, R.A. (2016). Social
Psychology. Boston: Person Publishing Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.undefinedBenchmark InformationundefinedThis benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:undefinedMS Psychology 2.2: Evaluate Interpersonal skillsundefined2.3: Propose values that build community at local, national, or global levels.undefinedTextbook: Branscome, N.R., & Baron, R.A. (2016). Social Psychology. Boston: Person Publishing

In this discussion you’ll consider the past 100 years of research and practice and examine the effectiveness of the current use of technology in education. Prior to completing this discussion read Mishra (2012).
Initial Post: Create an initial response that addresses the following:
Part 1: Research.

Locate one scholarly resource that examines the use of technology in education. This resource must be different than one you’ve already used in the course.
Provide the full APA citation for this source.
Provide a summary of the resource you’ve located. This summary should be at least 100 words, but not more than 150 words, in length.

Part 2: Reflect.
Answer the following:

In what ways has technology changed the way we teach in the classroom?
How effectively is technology being used in education?
How has technology improved classroom teaching? How has it made teaching more challenging?

Guided Response: Post responses to at least two classmates. In your response, reflect on your classmate’s responses. Questions you might consider in your response include:

Do you agree with your classmate’s assessment of how technology has changed the way we teach?
How does your view of the effectiveness of technology compare to your peers?

Now that you are in  the final week of this course, reflect upon our journey: the approaches  toward leadership and change, the turbulent landscape generated by VUCA,  leadership calm within this chaos, the interior conditions of  leadership, Bell Jars and Blind Spots, conscious movement toward the  future, sensing, being, and doing. Our authors note that many  individuals may seek one of two paths, one of violence or of isolation.  What about you? Considering our journey and the voices and prompts  encountered along the way, respond to the following questions:    

How will you choose to spend your precious life energy? How will you choose to lead?   

What “divides” will draw your attention?
How will you attempt sustaining change within a VUCA context?
How has your thinking shifted from Week 1’s assignment prompt and what if you could address that challenge now?
How would you address this challenge and “lead from the emerging  future”? Provide specific examples of new mental models, behaviors, and  actions you would use as a result of your learning from our course. 
In what ways has your learning over the past 8 weeks been  surprising?  How do you see it being useful in your future work as a  leader?

I’m working on a psychology multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

For this assignment, watch “Face blindness” and write a short comment in response to the questions outlined below.
you may have seen this fabulous two-part video produced by “60 minutes” earlier in the course that describes the various aspects of prosopagnosia in an engaging and informative manner, as well as neuroimaging research on faces.
As you watch the videos, you will “meet” Dr. Nancy Kanwisher (Professor, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at MIT). As you’ll see, she conducted an fMRI study on people with congenital prosopagnosia. Pay special attention to the hypothesis that she tried to address in that study (part 2).
Use your knowledge of spatio-temporal stages of face processing to answer the following questions (in 250 – 300 words):

What is the basic hypothesis that the study was testing?
What part of the brain was in the study’s focus and why?
Using your knowledge of the spatio-temporal stages of face processing, explain why Dr. Kanwisher’s hypothesis was not supported?
What do you think is happening instead? How would YOU interpret these findings? (again, recall the stages of face processing)