This assignment is a weekly log for you to keep track of and get credit for doing workouts for our physical fitness class. You will need to complete 100 minutes this week (due this Monday). I would like you to cut and paste the “log template” below and use it when you hand in your weekly log assignment. The log template is for 7 days but you can cut it down to 3 days or 5 days or any amount of days if that is what you choose to do for a particular week. You will need to put in the specific day, exercise/drill completed and total time in minutes. GradingIn order to receive full credit for this log you must do ALL the following this week and list it in your weekly log:Stretching routine (5 minutes each) video (complete at least 3 times) 21 Minute Pure Cardio (21 minutes each) video (complete at least 1 time) Full Body Level 1 or Level 2 (25 minutes each) video (complete at least 1 time) Video Assignment Full Body (2 minutes each) video (complete at least 2 times – 1 for practice and 1 for your video)Pick 1 workout from Level 1 Speed & Agility HIIT, Level 2 Speed & Agility, 19 Minute HIIT, Level 1 Full Body HIIT, Level 2 Full Body workout, 20 Minutes With This Strength-Training Workout, 21 Minute Pure Cardio (25, 21, 20 or 19 minutes each) videoComplete at least once 15 Second Core (5 minutes) videoPick at least twice (your choice) from the following core exercises 100 Crunches (5 minutes each) or 100 Plank SOSOS (5 minutes each) or 7 Minute Sitting Core (7 minutes) or 15 Second Core (5 minutes) videoTo get to the 100 minute Weekly Log minimum, you can repeat the above exercises, or choose from the list below. If you go over the 100 minute Weekly Log minimum please list the exercises. I really would like to see all the great workouts you are completing during your week.If you do less than the required items, you will only receive partial credit or no credit.Below is a list of workouts in different areas that we have covered in this course. This list is to help you choose your workouts for the week besides the required workouts. Please choose from this list when deciding on the workouts to use beyond the minimum workouts listed above under Grading “to earn full credit”.Workout Video Library for ES 19abcStretching Stretching video (5 mins)Core100 crunches (5 mins)100 planks SOSOS (6 mins)7 minute sitting core (7 mins)15 Second Core (5 mins)Workouts – extended timeLevel 1 Speed & Agility HIIT (25 mins)Level 2 Speed & Agility (25 mins)19 Minute HIIT (19 mims)Level 1 Full Body HIIT (25 mins)Level 2 Full Body (25 mins)20 Minutes With This Strength-Training Workout (20-24 mins)21 Minute Pure CardioCardio/Core Workouts – short timeJump Rope 10’s (5 mins)50 burpie, push-up, jump (5-10 mins)90 second Speed & Agility (2 mins)90 second 19 Min HIIT (2 mins)90 second Full Body (2 mins)Strength TrainingBST – biceps, shoulders, triceps (10 mins)I will be adding to this list as we progress through the semester. We will be creating a “workout library” for you to use throughout this semester and hopefully beyond this semester. Remember you can also add your own current workouts or workouts you attain through the internet for your weekly log.Weekly Log for Physical FitnessMonday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Tuesday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Wednesday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Thursday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Friday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Saturday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Sunday – Date:Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):Exercise/Drill (time):

Think of an organization you have worked for or one with which you are very familiar. Diagnose the need for change and present a plan to transform the organization, utilizing Kotter’s 8-Step Approach. You will need to research the Kotter 8 Step Change Model extensively. You are encouraged to first review the Kotter’s Eight Step Leading Change Model (Links to an external site.) article. You may select any organization or department where you work or where you have previously worked; however, you are strongly encouraged to diagnose one problem area in the company. Attempting to diagnose an entire company is not feasible, and you will become bogged down.If you choose a company similar to Walmart to analyze, select just one area that you think needs improvement. For example, Walmart is now very strong in online shopping, yet there are still glitches in the system. Delivery times are often late, the packaging method has problems, and some products come from unknown vendors that Walmart does not guarantee. We may know this from personal experience, but that is not enough. Statements, opinions, and experiences must be supported with valid sources. There are many articles online that you can review easily and quickly.Your sources for this paper must include research for the company you choose, a valid source for the Kotter model, and your textbook. You are encouraged to read as many articles as you can find and contact the University of Arizona Global Campus librarians for guidance. There is bias, missing or incorrect information, and contradictory material in most Internet material. The amount of material can be confusing, but wade through it and question everything.Include the following sections headings and additional sections as needed:IntroductionCompany OverviewDiagnosisKotter’s 8-Step ApproachConclusionThe Final Paper for the course must be submitted to the instructor by 11:59 p.m. of the time zone in which you reside on the last day of the class.Writing the Final PaperThe Final PaperMust be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not counting the title page and references) and formatted according to APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.Must include a title page with the following:Title of paperStudent’s nameCourse name and numberInstructor’s nameDate submittedFor further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.), refer to the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center resources.Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.Must use at least five scholarly sources in addition to the course text.The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center’s APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center for specifications.

my group chose the topic – improving patient outcomes with interventions to prevent nurse burnout
I chose the Orem theory
Initial post 

Each small group selects one major clinical practice challenge.

Select this small group topic early, so all have time to respond.

Each student will identify a different nursing theory that applies to this topic and how that theory affects your individualized assessment, targeted intervention, and measurable specific outcomes. At least 2 grand theories (e.g., Orem, Neuman, Johnson, King, Roy, etc.) and 3 middle range nursing theories (e.g., Benner, Pender, Leininger, Mishel, etc.) must be selected. Use the discussion board to state your selected theory ahead of time. WE WANT NO DUPLICATION OF THEORY TO OCCUR. 
Each student should provide a primary source article in which the theory is described and a current primary research study to support the importance of the major practice challenge (doesn’t have to test the theory selected). Your textbook may not be used as a primary source reference for theory.

For the initial posting, students need to include:

Purpose of the theory, major concepts and relationship statements and usefulness. 

Describe the major concepts and relationship statements between concepts applicable to your group topic. Provide a succinct description of the theory (Prefer less than 1000 words).
Include conceptual and operational definitions and specific linkages of concepts that are applicable to the relationship statements/propositions you plan to apply to your group’s selected topic. One or two relationship statements suffice. If the definitions of concepts are not provided or relationship statements not specifically stated by the theorist state this.
Make sure the relationship statements and major concepts of your theory are paraphrased in your own words. To simply copy this information from one source to another does not allow faculty to assess your understanding of the assignment nor your ability to paraphrase information at a graduate level. This is true for all discussion post assignments this semester.

Level of the theory (e.g., grand, middle, or practice)
Specific intervention you plan based on the theory concepts and relationship statement(s) you select to apply to your group topic. Refer to Module 3: Session 4 Theory Driven Intervention 

Describe specifically how your intervention fits with the theory guiding your intervention.
How will you specifically measure the specific theory concept and assess if the planned intervention worked? 
Example:  if your concept is self-efficacy, what scale will be used to determine if this was improved (e.g., may be a published scale that fits with your population or something you create).

Need two references for each post that are in correct APA 7th edition format. 

One primary article or book that was written by the theorist that describes the theory.
One current primary research article that supports the intervention you describe to address the topic selected.
Example of a potential small group topic:  
Self-care management education intervention to reduce blood glucose in male patients between the ages of 18 and 25 who are newly diagnosed with type I diabetes. 
Possible theories to consider for this topic listed directly above.  Students don’t have to select these if others are more appropriate. 

Orem – grand theory
Roy – grand theory
Pender – middle range
Leininger – middle range
Mishel – middle range

Second post
Once this posting is made by each student, you must each respond to another student’s post.
Provide two scholarly references to support your response. Examples of critical discussion include:

Comparing your post and your peer’s post, how did theories differ in the guidance provided to design interventions and address the topic?
Were there any major limitations with the theory selected by your peer?

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)Please summarize ARDS as a disease process, and discuss how the treatment plan for these patients is different from other patients with acute respiratory failure. Please discuss the specific medical and ventilator management plans for patients for ARDS, and discuss the findings from the article this week. Be sure to include at least one of the more controversial treatment options or mechanical ventilation modes for patients diagnosed with ARDS.Discussion Board Posting: Presentation ResponsesDiscussion Board Posting: Presentation ResponsesCriteriaRatingsPtsInitial Postview longer description1 pts1 ptsThe initial posting is substantive demonstrating critical thinking and thoughts delving deeper into the discussion topic and course content and includes a minimum of two professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0.5 pts0.5 ptsThe initial posting is somewhat substantive and/or includes only one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or completed by Thursday at 11:59 PM/EST.0.25 pts0.25 ptsThe initial posting is not substantive or submitted after Thursday at 11:59 PM/EST. The initial post does not include a reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal. Posted on same day as a response posting./ 1 ptsResponse 1view longer description0.5 pts0.5 ptsThe response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0.3 pts0.3 ptsThe response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0 pts0 ptsThe response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting./ 0.5 ptsResponse 2view longer description0.5 pts0.5 ptsThe response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0.3 pts0.3 ptsThe response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0 pts0 ptsThe response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting./ 0.5 ptsResponse 3view longer description0.5 pts0.5 ptsThe response is a substantive interaction that builds on the ideas of others, delving deeper into the discussion question and course content in response to a colleague. The response includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0.3 pts0.3 ptsThe response is somewhat substantive and includes one reference from a professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal.0 pts0 ptsThe response does not have a reference from professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal and/or did not post and/or posted on same day as initial posting and/or response posting./ 0.5 ptsClarity/APAview longer description0.5 pts0.5 ptsPosting and responses are clear, concise, and in proper APA format for citations and references. No grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds worth to the dialogue and the comments build on the previous statements of others.0.3 pts0.3 ptsPosting and responses are somewhat clear. Proper APA format for citation and reference noted in some areas but some APA infractions are apparent. Minor grammatical errors are noted. The entry adds to the dialogue, but some repetition and/or unclear thought is noted.0 pts0 ptsPosting and responses are unclear. APA format not followed. Grammatical errors are noted. The entry does not build on previous dialogue./ 0.5 ptsTotal Points: 0

Chosen Organization: Netflix!! Check attached files as they are related to the given request !!Create a 4 page annotated outline that include the sections to be analyzed, ethical decision making aspects of the topic, main points of the recommendation, and credible evidence you plan to use for supporting the analysis and recommendations.INTRODUCTIONWhile everyone has their own process for writing, creating an outline is often an important early step in the process in all types of writing, even for the most seasoned writers. By creating an outline, you draft a plan that organizes your thoughts, helps you see gaps in your thought process, and enables you to decide where in your paper you will address particular issues.An annotated outline is a document that organizes the main sections to be included in your paper. The annotations are based on thinking through your approach to the paper and developing enough detail that anyone who reads the outline can follow your thought process.ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTIONFor this assessment, create an annotated outline that provides a framework of your capstone project. Begin by reviewing the MBA Capstone Project Description [PDF]. Your annotated outline must state the name of your chosen organization and must include the following items: Identify the main sections to be developed in the paper and tie them to the project objectives. In your key sections, you should use at least four main headings; these sections make up the body of your outline. Each heading must have at least two sub-points to develop the detail required. Include a description of each major point. Identify where each supporting reference will be integrated. Include at least one reference to support each major point of the paper. Incorporate relevant quotes or paraphrases from a source that you might use for support, with an APA in-text citation. Identify main points that address ethical aspects associated with your chosen business. Ethical considerations/aspects should also be one of the headings of your outline. Use the program outcomes to help determine the areas of ethics that you might want to cover. Include at least one reference to elaborate on how you intend to cover ethics in your project. Identify main points that address leadership and collaboration aspects associated with your chosen business. Leadership and collaboration considerations/aspects should also be one of the headings of your outline. Review the program outcomes to determine the areas of leadership and collaboration that you should consider. Include at least one reference to elaborate on how you intend to cover leadership and collaboration in your project. Identify main points of your recommendations. Your recommendations should also be one of the headings of your outline. Identify credible evidence to support an analysis. For the evidence you provide, include key points to clarify why it matters and how it will inform the analysis.Your annotated outline should have these sections: An executive summary. An introduction. The body of your outline should be comprised of at least four main headings with additional subheadings and points. (Never use the word “Body” as a heading or subheading.) A conclusion. References. Use APA style and formatting for all the sources you use in the annotated outline. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Style: This outline should be written in academic format; refer to the corresponding MBA Academic and Professional Document Guidelines. It should be double spaced, use subheadings, and be well organized and well written. Communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality. APA guidelines: Format your paper according to current APA style and formatting. Resources: Use at least four resources from credible resources. Length: Your outline should be 4 pages. Font and font size: Use 12 point, Times New Roman.