Your second project in this course is to complete a historical context and introduction project. The work you did on the Topic Exploration Worksheet in Modules
One and Two will directly support your work on this project as well as your third longer term project—the multimedia presentation—due in Module Eight.
One of the prime benefits of studying history is that it allows us to learn about who we are and where we came from. The people and events of the past can often shed light on the conditions and social norms of the present. Having historical awareness can inform various aspects of your life as well as future aspirations. Learning from past failures and successes can shape ideals and values for years to come.
This is your second longer-term project designed to help you understand the fundamental processes and value of studying history. In the first project, you
completed the Topic Exploration Worksheet on one of the topics or themes from the library guide. You investigated the types of research you might need to do
to learn more about the topic and developed research questions. In Project 2, you will use your completed Topic Exploration Worksheet to explore the
historical context and develop an introduction. You will choose one of your research questions and do some secondary source research, speculate on primary
source needs, and use the information to write the introduction and thesis statement for a possible research paper. (You will not write the entire paper—
only the introduction.) In the third project, you will create a multimedia presentation that explores both major developments in historical inquiry and the value
of examining history.
This research plan and introduction assignment will assess the following course outcome, which you focused on throughout Modules Three and Four:
? Determine fundamental approaches to studying history in addressing questions about how events are shaped by their larger historical context
Prompt
In this project, you will write the introductory paragraph of a history paper based on one of the questions you identified in your topic exploration worksheet. To do this, however, you must first find out a bit more information about your topic and draft a research plan. This will allow you to transform your question about your topic into a thesis statement, as well as give you the background information you will need to craft an interesting introductory paragraph. You will not write the entire paper, just the introduction to the paper that concludes with a thesis statement. The following critical elements will be assessed in a Word document that combines both your research plan (Critical Elements I and II) and your introduction (Critical Element III).
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Write your introduction.
A. Write your introduction. Be sure to incorporate your background information and to conclude with your thesis statement.
B. Based on your primary and secondary source research, turn your research question into a thesis statement that addresses your topic and how it has been influenced by its historical context.
II. Use primary and secondary sources that address the historical context of your topics to respond to the following critical elements. Be sure to cite your
information using the most recent version of APA guidelines. Based on the sources you have selected, address the following questions:
A. Summarize the topic using primary and secondary sources. In other words, what was going on in the world/area/society around the event?
B. Discuss how the historical context impacted the topic. For instance, what was happening in the world/area/society around the event that impacted how it occurred?
 

Discussion Board #2: Issue Guide AnalysisDiscussion Board #2: Issue Guide AnalysisIn your reading this week, Carcasson discusses the role of analyzing issues in deliberation. You will write a 4-paragraph post, using the following format:In the first paragraph, first, in one sentence, identify the main problem articulated in this week’s issue guide. Then, explain the three options the issue guide lays out as possible approaches for addressing the problem. Finally, in this paragraph, explain why this issue is relevant or matters to you. If it doesn’t, explain that and offer a consideration about why that is the case.In the second paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the first approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).In the third paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the second approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).In the fourth paragraph, in the first half of the paragraph, please explain (using reasoning) what you like most about the third approach outlined in the issue guide. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide, or other forms). In the second half, please explain what your greatest concern(s) is/are about the approach. It is not enough to just write what you like – you must give reasoning as to why you like it (you can use reasoning in the form of personal experience, testimony, statistics, research from the issue guide,or other forms).Finally, Carcasson, in your reading, explains “deliberative issue analysis involves researching issues, positions, and community voices in order to determine the:Obstacles to deliberative engagement (What is making it difficult for relevant audience to engage each other and the issue productively? What do we need to know before we bring people together to engage this topic?) -Example obstacles: power imbalances between participants, motivation, knowledge/skill,manipulation of public opinion, group polarization, lack of spaces for deliberative discussionDeliberative tensions. What are the values or issues in this problem that are in tension with each other?Collaborative resources. What resources are available on this issue for collaborative action?Choose one or more of the considerations he discusses, explain it using quotes and citations from your reading, and then explain how the issue guide we are deliberating this week does or does not address this consideration in its design.

IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.A servant leadershipA servant leadership focuses on sharing the power of authority, it focuses more on serving by building a partnership through trust and sustainability, so that the leaders can best use all resources at hand to better serve their community. For example, servant leaders build trust and sustainable partnership by being willing to do the same work they are asking their team members to do, along with collaborating with those team members to complete the work and showing compassion and understanding for everyone. Therefore, it is important for servant leaders to have these trust and sustainable partnerships so that they can receive help in achieving an effective goal to better serve others and help improve the lives of others. Nelson MandelaAn example of someone who exhibits servant leadership skills in building a cross-cultural partnership is Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela was the President of South Africa (1994-1999) and was very vocal and proactive in his fight against apartheid and was also the first black individual to become head of state in South Africa. His entire demeanor and goal were focused on serving his people and his actions and goals were able to transcend the country’s borders. His efforts were successful because of his influential presence, his determination, humility, patience, endurance, charisma, and willingness to be one with the people instead of the traditional leaders who separate themselves from their people (History, 2019). A true partnership involves risk shared by all parties.I agree with the statement that a true partnership involves risk shared by all parties. This is because once you enter into an agreed partnership, you will be reaping all the benefits from the outcome, this means you will also reap all the risk from the outcome. Furthermore, a partnership is a collaborative relationship built on trust and liability, where everyone is working together on a specific outcome, therefore, sharing the load of the project or event.ReferenceHistory. (2019). Nelson Mandela. https://www.history.com/topics/africa/nelson-mandelaRespond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism. Ask a probing question.Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.Offer and support an opinion.Validate an idea with your own experience.Make a suggestion.Expand on your colleague’s posting.Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this classTo get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.ReferencesAmerican Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Need Case Briefs for these cases. very short for each just highlight the case and statutes Blue book formatChapter 1undefinedCase 1Marie v. Am. Red Cross37undefinedCase 2Keller v. Miri Microsystems, LLC42undefinedChapter 2 undefinedCase 1Palmateer v. International HarvesterCompany94undefinedCase 2Herawi v. State of Alabama, Department ofForensic Sciences95undefinedCase 3Guz v. Bechtel National Inc.99undefinedCase 4McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green100undefinedCase 5Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Company102undefinedCase 6Griggs v. Duke Power Co.103undefinedChapter 3 Cases undefinedCase 1Petruska v. Gannon University140undefinedCase 2Patterson v. McLean Credit Union142undefinedCase 3Ali v. Mount Sinai Hospital143undefinedChapter 4 undefinedCase 1EEOC v. Consolidated Service System209undefinedCase 2National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab211undefinedCase 3Coats v. Dish Network, LLC 213undefinedChapter 5 undefinedCase 1Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC267undefinedCase 2Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa ClaraCounty, California269undefinedCase 3Ricci v. DeStefano273undefinedChapter 6 Cases pg 419undefinedCase 1Alonao v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A317undefinedCase 2Jones v. Robinson Property Group, L.P., d/b/aHorseshoe Casino & Hotel318undefinedCase 3Vaughn v. Edel319undefinedCase 4Chandler v. Fast Lane, Inc321undefinedChapter 7 undefinedCase 1Garcia v. Spun Steak Co357undefinedCase 2Vega v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist359undefinedCase 3Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Company363undefinedCase 4Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co366undefinedCase 5Reyes-Fuentes v. Shannon Produce Farm, Inc367undefinedChapter 8 undefinedCase 1Wedow v. City of Kansas City, Missouri419undefinedCase 2Dothard v. Rawlinson421undefinedCase 3Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins422undefinedCase 4Lynch v. Freeman423undefinedChapter 9 undefinedCase 1Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth464undefinedCase 2Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson465undefinedCase 3Ellison v. Brady467undefinedCase 4Faragher v. City of Boca Raton469undefinedChapter10 undefinedCase 1Weaver v. Nebo School DistrictundefinedCase 2Macy v. Holder 516undefinedCase 3Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana521undefinedCase 4Nichols v. Azteca Restaurant Enterprises, Inc. 523undefinedCase 5Jane Doe v. Boeing Company 525undefinedCase 6Buonanno v. AT&T Broadband, LLC 528undefinedChapter 11 undefinedCase 1Peterson v. Wilmur Communications, Inc.562undefinedCase 2Chalmers v. Tulon Company of Richmond564undefinedCase 3Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison568undefinedCase 4Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.570undefinedCase 5EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch574undefinedChapter 12 undefinedCase 1Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell622undefinedCase 2Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.624undefinedCase 3Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins626undefinedCase 4Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.627undefinedChapter 13 undefinedCase 1Ferrari v. Ford Motor Co.696undefinedCase 2E.E.O.C. v. Ford Motor Co.699undefinedCase 3Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.705undefinedCase 4Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems707undefinedChapter 14 undefinedCase 1O’Connor v. Ortega781undefinedCase 2Shoun v. Best Formed Plastics, Inc.784undefinedCase 3City of San Diego v. Roe786undefinedCase 4City of Ontario v. Quon788undefinedChapter 15undefinedCase 1Commonwealth v. Hunt827undefinedCase 2Gimrock Construction, Inc. v. International Unionof Operating Engineers, Local 487829undefinedCase 3Columbia Portland Cement Co. v. NLRB831undefinedCase 4Electromation v. National Labor Relations Board832undefinedChapter 16undefinedCase 1Reich v. Circle C Investments, Inc.890undefinedCase 2Mullins v. City of New York891undefinedCase 3Varity Corp. v. Howe893undefinedCase 4Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz894

This reflection activity is an opportunity for you to reflect on all you’ve accomplished this term. It is through reflection — contemplating what we have experienced — that we understand the importance of our experiences and make use of them in the future, i.e., reflection is a very important part of learning. InstructionsContextTo better understand the context of English 102, you will reflect on your learning this semester. Using your own writing as evidence, you will evaluate your learning outcome achievement.PurposeThe purpose of the Final Reflection Essay is to evaluate your learning outcome achievement and reflect on your learning this semester.Process1. Read your writing (major and minor assignments) from this semester.2. Read instructor feedback on you writing this semester.3. Review learning outcomes from our syllabus (see p. 2).4. Choose three learning outcomes you have achieved.5. Write draft of Final Reflection Essay6. Post draft of Final Reflection Essay on Blackboard.7. Respond to two classmates’ Final Reflection Essays on Blackboard.8. Submit Final Reflection Essay by deadline.RequirementsFor this assignment, in 750-1000 words, you will evaluate and reflect upon your learning in our course, choose three learning outcomes (below), provide relevant evidence and development for each of the three learning outcomes, contextualize your overall thesis in an engaging introduction, close your essay in a relevant conclusion, and generally apply characteristics of thoughtful, engaged, and correct writing for your Final Reflection Journal.Choose from the learning outcomes listed below in order to write your essay.Learning OutcomesAt the end of this course, you will be able toRhetorical KnowledgeResearchAnalyze how audience/purpose dictate information included, the order of information, voice, language, and styleDevelop an effective research question to guide a sustained research projectApply conventions of format and structure appropriate to various rhetorical situationsApply systematic research methodology using library databases to locate and utilize a variety of credible sources (e.g., scholarly journals as well as interviews, case studies, lectures, surveys)Distinguish between credible sources and non-credible sources, both in traditional print media and outlineIntegrate source materials using summaries, paraphrases, and quotations to support a defendable thesisProcesses/ConventionsCritical Thinking, Reading, and WritingCreate texts, with multiple drafts, that adhere to the conventions of Standard Academic EnglishDemonstrate close reading of a text through various strategies (e.g. annotating, outlining, summarizing, note taking)Utilize invention and re-thinking to revise their workUtilize a dictionary to help facilitate understanding of various textsCollaborate and utilize effectively the social aspects of writing processes (writer-peer & writer-instructor review)Locate, evaluate, analyze, and synthesize appropriate primary and secondary sourcesSummarize and paraphrase arguments and/or other texts * Use quotations and citations appropriately (including sources that cite other sources)Use interpretation to recognize the author’s meaning and strategies (e.g., induction, deduction) to develop ideasUse MLA documentation system and/or the APA documentation systemCritique complex arguments of sustained length (longer than the average op-ed piece or newspaper article)Identify and avoid different types of plagiarism (i.e., intentional and unintentionalIdentify logical fallacies and authorial bias, and analyze their effects on an argumentRecognize and acknowledge diverse perspectives of an issueFormulate constructive questions that facilitate meaningful inquiry