solved Part 1 In a few short paragraphs or less, share

Part 1
In a few short paragraphs or less, share your thoughts on this week’s reading. You could share a new insight, likes, dislikes, disagreements with the author, etc. This should NOT be a synopsis of the reading. You must also post a comment/reply on a classmate’s post. this should be on chapter 18 of Information systems Version 8 By John Gallaugher 2020 (must have this exact book)
Part 2
Review this weeks headlines for stores related to IT and choose one. Look for stories that you find interesting or have strong feelings about. must be a recent article and IT related. please make is simple easy to and clear to understand Post a link to your story and brief description of the article and why you believe it’s a good ITSoW here. please use this article https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/31/style/anonymity…( 1 short paragraph is enough )
Part 3
Consider Google’s influence on society, understanding, education, and perception. When Google delivers the majority of search results and most users default first to Google’s products, do you feel that gives a single firm too much power?  Do you think governments have a role in regulating a firm with this amount of influence? Why or why not?)(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)

Part 4
Consider your search habits on mobile devices vs. desktop computers. Are there certain product categories that you used to go to Google for, but where you’ll now rely on an app? How do you suppose this impacts Google’s revenue? If you were Google, how might you combat challenges as search shifts from a single search engine to niche apps?(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)
Part 5
Google’s unofficial motto is “Don’t be evil.” But sometimes it’s challenging for managers to tell what path is “most right” or “least wrong.” Google operates in countries that require the firm to screen and censor results. Short term, this is clearly a limitation on freedom of speech. But long term, access to the Internet could catalyze economic development and spread information in a way that leads to more democratization. Investigate, consider, and argue the case for either limiting development in speech-limiting countries or working within them as a potential agent of change. What other pressures is a publicly-traded firm under to choose one path or the other? Which path would you choose and why?(in your own words no references and no copying and pasting from other sites 1-2 short paragraphs is enough)

solved Chief Financial Officer InterviewActivity: As the new Controller in the

Chief Financial Officer InterviewActivity: As the new Controller in the finance department responsible for the financial accounting operations, (recall the primary purpose of financial accounting is to provide useful financial information, generally historic in nature, about an organizations financial activities and affairs) you are interested in learning the level of performance, readiness, education, and training of the department staff as it relates to their knowledge of the accounting cycle operations. In order to obtain an accurate understanding, a meeting with the Chief Financial Officer was requested. With the meeting set for Monday morning (plan on 45 minutes), there are a number of items that will need to be considered as you reflect on the experiences learned at your previous employer.Prior to giving notice and submitting your letter of resignation with your previous employer, the outside auditors as part of their standard procedures were in the process of issuing a letter to management regarding their findings and concerns on the monthly closing process and production of the monthly interim financial statements. According to the draft of the letter, the auditor’s concerns focused on the accuracy of the monthly financial statements, lack of internal control and ethical conduct in the office. Because of the restriction placed on the scope of the audit, incomplete documentation, missed closing entries not revealed to the auditors, and the general climate of disorder among the accounting staff that a qualified opinion along with a going concern comment was recorded in the draft letter. This letter in final form untimely led to the dismissal of the Chief Financial Officer and the resignation of the Treasurer of the Board of Directors. Question: Develop an interview agenda for the meeting with the Chief Financial Officer. Be certain to consider not only your prior experience as you make a list of your questions (10) relating to the accounting cycle at the organization but also a careful ear and eye for hints of the type of problems present with your new employer as they affect the accounting cycle process. Also, develop for each question the Chief Financial Officer’s response and appropriate reference citations in APA format. In addition to the standard approach to agenda development (clearly defined meeting objective, prioritized list of topics, estimate of time for each item to be discussed, and any written material that you would like to have the Chief Financial Officer review prior to the meeting) be aware of the meeting time and the politics of the office.

solved Special Education Law Presentation Video In order to be compliant

Special Education Law Presentation Video
In order to be compliant with current education laws and policies relating to individuals with disabilities, it is important to understand their historical context. There have been many education policy changes resulting from court cases, laws, and social movements in society. The laws that have formed special education today will most definitely effect the job of a special education teacher.
For this assignment, create a 3-5 minute video that could be posted on a school special education webpage as a resource for parents of students with disabilities. The video should show you as the presenter, summarizing the history of special education law in the United States, highlighting important historical judicial decisions.
Use the “Special Education Law Presentation Video Template” to outline the video. Your video presentation should consider the parental/guardian audience, be clear, and follow the “Professional Dispositions of Learners.”
Include the following in your video:

Brief history of special education before the 1970’s and from the 1970’s to present day  referencing appropriate judicial decisions.
Brief description of two court cases about parental rights and students educational rights such as FERPA, IDEA, or rights of students in public charter schools or private schools.
At least 3-4 recommended resources including at least one from the state in which you will teach to stay up-to-date with current legal trends in special education

Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly references.
Resources 
Read chapters 1,2, and 3.
URL:
http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2015/law-and-special-education-the_ebook_4e.php
Read “The Difference Between IEPs and 504 Plans ,” by The Understood Team, located on the Understood website (2018).
URL:
https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/special-services/504-plan/the-difference-between-ieps-and-504-plans
Explore the Americans with Disabilities Act website.
URL:
http://www.ada.gov/
Read, “The Special Education Handbook: A Brief Overview of the History and Requirements of Part B of the IDEA,” located on the Arizona Department of Education Special Education website (2018).
URL:
https://cms.azed.gov/home/GetDocumentFile?id=5a70ec153217e1086cb2944c
Review, the “Exceptional Student Services: Parents and Families,” located on the Arizona Department of Education Special Education website.
URL:
http://www.azed.gov/specialeducation/parents/
Read “Professional Dispositions of Learners,” located on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.

solved Request: Write 2 essays, each 1500 words. Please deliver each

Request: Write 2 essays, each 1500 words. Please deliver each topic in a separate document with its own references and citation. I am also attaching below the topics the marking criteria. The following are the topics and title for the two essays:Topic 1 : Technology went hand-in-hand with the rise of globalisation – but today’s innovations risk something worse” Topic 2: “Ignore the pessimists – technology is still creating a more open and interconnected world economy”Marking criteria for Summative AssessmentKnowledge and understandingDoes the essay demonstrate comprehension and application of knowledge and concepts delivered and discussed in the unit? Does the essay convey the results of independent research and reading? Does the essay apply issues and debates raised by wider global challenges (political, economic, social) to the practical concerns faced by businesses in the global business environment?Argument and analysisDoes the essay present a coherent and logical analysis deploying themes and concepts from broader academic and policy debates? Does the analysis show evidence of a strong underpinning argument? Is the argument reinforced with reference to ideas and material covered in lectures, podcasts and readings?Structure and styleIs the essay well written, with minimal mistakes in language, grammar and syntax? Does the essay show signs of effective planning and organisation, with a clear structure and argumentative/analytical flow between and within paragraphs? Is due credit given to the sources of ideas and evidence?Formatting, referencing and deadlineFormattingAssignments should be formatted using Arial or Times New Roman font in size 12, double-spaced with normal margins.Word limitsEach part of the assignment should be around 1500 words. So both essays together should have around 3000 words. There is no direct marks penalty for going below or above the recommended word count, but a failure to stick to the recommended word length may indicate the essay is overly concise or long-winded and may thus merit a lower mark.References and bibliographyYou will not be assessed on the presence or quantity of references and citations, but in order to avoid plagiarism, you must ensure that you give credit where elements of the argument are not your own. As such, just as in any Economist article, you should refer to a lecturer or author by name where you are drawing upon ideas or information from a lecture or text – e.g. ‘as Jon Beaverstock has argued…’, ‘as Jeremy Green writes in his book Is Globalization Over?…’, ‘as Pankaj Mishra has written…’.

solved Week 3 Assignment: Organizational Reflection/Power StructuresFor this Assignment, further ref

Week 3 Assignment: Organizational Reflection/Power StructuresFor this Assignment, further reflect upon the organization you chose in Week 1. In Part 1 of your paper, describe the power structure(s) within the organization. In Part 2 of your paper, analyze the power structures and uses of power within the organization by answering the following question: Are the power structures/uses of power demonstrated by the leaders within the organization (e.g., hard power or soft power) effective or ineffective? Defend your position by including your own experiences as well as references from personal experience, required readings and related academic research.To prepare for this Assignment, pay particular attention to the following Learning Resources:To complete the Organizational Reflection/Power Structures Assignment, compose a cohesive document that addresses the following: Summarize the three main “takeaways” you gained from this week’s Discussion and why you think they are important. Describe the power structure(s) within the organization you selected in Week 1. Analyze the power structures and uses of power within the organization by answering the following questions: Are the power structures/uses of power demonstrated by the leaders within the organization (e.g., hard power or soft power) effective or ineffective? Why? How do power structures affect your effectiveness as a leader? Do the power structures found in the organization you chose promote positive social change? Why or why not? Be sure to support your Organizational Reflection/Power Structures using this week’s readings or other credible and relevant resources and adhere to APA format. You may also include quotes from the weekly Discussion that you think support your Reflection entry.General Guidance: This week’s Organizational Reflection/Power Structures submission should be about 4–5 pages in length. Refer to the Week 3 Organizational Reflection/Power Structures Rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.Submit your Organizational Reflection/Power Structures. In order to receive credit, all assignments are due by the deadline. Should you encounter an unanticipated and uncontrollable life event that may prevent you from meeting an assignment deadline, contact the Instructor immediately to request an extension. Your Instructor’s contact information is in the Instructor area. For a full description of the late policy, please refer to the “Policies on Late Assignments” section of your Syllabus.Please use attached template to complete assignment.

solved Discussion 1: Virtue and purpose Please carefully read and think

Discussion 1: Virtue and purpose Please carefully read and think about the entire prompt before composing your first post. This discussion will require you to have carefully read Chapter 5 of the textbook, as well as the assigned portions of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle’s account of ethics is “teleological”, which means that our understanding of virtue and living well is based on a sense of the “telos” (function, purpose, or end) of something (see Aristotle’s text and the textbook for the full account). Engage with the text: Using at least one quoted passage from the required text(s), explain the relation between virtue and living well on Aristotle’s account, and briefly describe some of the key characteristics of virtue ethics. Reflect on yourself: Identify an area of your life in which particular virtues are needed to do well. Explain what the “telos” (or plural of telos?) of that role or activity is, what virtues are needed and why they are needed, and what would be lost if someone tried to be successful in that activity who didn’t exercise the virtues. This might be a role you have, a vocation or career, a hobby, or something common to all of us. Reflect on virtue: In what ways do the virtues you identify display the characteristics Aristotle describes? For instance, you could explain whether they occupy an intermediate between too much and too little of some quality, how they would affect one’s emotions as well as ones actions, etc. Discussion 2 Hi class, this week we have a symposium where the approach should consider how to engage the topic via virtue ethics. The focus topic for this week is to discuss what we need to have, as a society, to help individuals flourish and develop their own talents and ethical abilities. In other words, what is needed to help enable people to become virtuous, to become good citizens, and to be able to live rich, meaningful lives? To start thinking more about how to answer that, I would like you to watch the following two short clips from Martha Nussbaum to use and relate to in your response: Martha Nussbaum is a contemporary theorist who bases some of the core concepts and reasoning of her approach to issues like social policy and ethics on some of the core assumptions of virtue ethics. See the following two clips to get a brief sense of how she does this: Martha Nussbaum: 1 minute on translating Aristotle’s term “eudaimonia” as human flourishing, a complex idea not simply reducible to “happiness” in the common sense. https://youtu.be/cbcGbflpFzI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCFtCG-_MrE

solved INTRODUCTION In this task, you will assume the role of

INTRODUCTION
In this task, you will assume the role of a chief privacy officer (CPO) in a healthcare setting who has experienced a breach. You will determine how many patients were affected in the breach, develop a focused risk analysis of the breach, identify software that should be implemented, and create a breach notification letter.

The purpose of this task is to 1) examine the role of different types of healthcare information systems in health information management (HIM); 2) examine the structure, function, and security associated in a HIM setting; and 3) evaluate privacy and security concerns involved in the use of technology in a healthcare setting.
SCENARIO
You are the CPO at WGU Hospital, a large teaching facility. A doctor brought a mobile device when going on break, during which the device was stolen from the doctor’s car. The mobile device has access to the hospital’s electronic health record (EHR).

As the CPO, you must determine how many patients’ information was breached. Additionally, you must conduct a focused risk analysis of the breach to see which safeguards should be implemented to prevent future breaches, as well as identify which software should be implemented to ensure all regulatory concerns are appropriately addressed. Furthermore, you must craft a letter notifying all the patients affected in the breach.
REQUIREMENTS 
A.  Using the scenario above, answer the following prompts:
1.  Develop a plan to determine the number of patients whose information was breached.
2.  Explain what steps should be taken to perform the focused risk analysis of the breach.
3.  Recommend an administrative safeguard that should be reviewed and updated to prevent future breaches from occurring.
4.  Recommend a technical safeguard that should be reviewed and updated to prevent future breaches from occurring.
5.  Recommend a physical safeguard that should be reviewed and updated to prevent future breaches from occurring.
6.  Discuss two safekeeping practices the physician in the scenario should follow to prevent a future breach.
7.  Discuss the applicable fines and penalties that could be imposed on the facility for this disclosure.
8.  Discuss a software the hospital should implement to make accessing mobile devices safer in the future.
B.  Create a breach notification letter to all the patients affected in the breach.
C.  Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D.  Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

solved The purpose of this course is not simply to accumulate

The purpose of this course is not simply to accumulate knowledge about the concepts associated with the concepts of justice and how these apply/affect communities. The primary purpose is to develop a new lens through which to view established and frequently accepted systems of justice, determine the values and assumptions they are predicated on and their potential effectiveness. This new lens also provides a means to assess whether or not systems reflect one’s own values and assumptions. Criminal Justice is a prevalent topic in popular media (television, film, literature etc.). For the purposes of this assignment, you are to select one of three documentaries to view. “Herman’s House” is available on YouTube. “Murder to Mercy: The Cyntoia Brown Story” and “13th” are both on Netflix.Assignment breakdown: For the purpose of this assignment, you are to watch one of the documentaries and write a review/critique of the documentary through a restorative community-based lens. Your critique must address the following: 1. What are the assumptions and values you identify that relate to victims, offenders, communities, trauma, shame, etc.? Tie in theories from the course. 2. What restorative assumptions and values are missing? 3. Do you believe that this portrayal of the system has an impact on viewers’ faith in the system and their perception of its effectiveness? ï If so, describe the impact and comment on whether it contributes to a positive, negative or neutral influence on the general public’s perception of the criminal justice system and its effectiveness. ï If not, provide rationale for why you believe the portrayal of the system does not to influence an individual’s perceptions.This assignment is to be 5 pages in length (not including references & cover page), double spaced, Times New Roman 12 font. Please include the documentary title in your cover page. Grading will be according to how well the paper: ï Draws on specific details from the documentaryï Correctly identifies and describes underlying assumptions and values ï Clearly critiques the movie from the perspective of a restorative world view. ï Draws a logical connection from watching the documentary to its potential impact on a viewer’s perception of justice. Although you are only referencing course material for this assignment, bibliography and citations are required.You have to reference these two books in the paper:Zehr, Changing Lense https://read.amazon.com/?asin=B010R6V2YOZehr, Amstutz, MacRae & Pranis The Big Book of Restorative Justice https://read.amazon.com/?asin=B016HBYSLM

solved I have an essay to write in my English class.

I have an essay to write in my English class. I don’t have all the requirements for this essay yet so I need to start off 1. Post a hyperlink (internet link) to your source or a PDF. 2. Describe how you found this link (Google Scholar, library, etc.)3. Provide an MLA citation for your source (this is how your source will appear on the Works Cited page).4. Provide a brief description/ summary of the source and how you plan to use it (What will it support? What kind of evidence in the source can be used for your research) – just a paragraph or two. I will upload an example of how you can do this assignment. So all the information down is to help you find the sources. I will post another question for the next step. So the first thing is In your paper, you must have at least (minimum) of 5 credible sources. You may use the two introductory texts by Tim Urban (TedTalk) and Adam Grant (article) as two of your five sources. This means that if you include Urban’s and Grant’s texts, you must find at least 3 more sources. Remember 5 is the minimum, and you can have as many as 10 if you wish to do more extensive research. You do not have to include Grant’s and Urban’s text, but it’s a good idea. I have the Tim Urban (TedTalk) and Adam Grant (article) sources ready with me so you can use them later in the essay. So your job for now just to find the other 3 sources and this is the requirement on how to find them What kind of sources are acceptable?Because it is a research paper, you will be looking for sources in:national magazines (i.e. Psychology Today). These magazines are written for the general public, but often include scientific research summarized by the authors. professional journals: in professional journals, the research articles are written by scientists and researchers and are peer-reviewed. You must have at least 2 of such sources.government sites and publications: For example, CDC (Center for Disease Control) is one such site. podcasts that are relevant to the topic (listen to this example: “Inspiration Through Procrastination” (Links to an external site.) appeared on On Point program on WBUR radio – NPR – on March 13, 2018)educational videos and lectures, such as Ted TalksHow to find credible sources:You can search for credible sources by:using Grossmont College library database (highly recommended)using Google Scholar database (recommended)using Google or other search engines (optional)On the next page, you will learn how to use the library database and Google Scholar. You must use these websites to look for credible scholarly articles for your research paper.

solved For this assignment, you will find two substantially argued articles

For this assignment, you will find two substantially argued articles on similar topics and decide which one you think is more convincing to its target audience, based on your analysis of the authors’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos, along with other rhetorical strategies. The articles you choose should be recently published and from well-known, reputable sources such as a major newspaper (example, the New York Times) or academic journal, or magazine (example, Fortune). The articles should present a specific position on the topic with supporting textual material, such as examples, logical reasoning, facts, statistics, etc. The target audience is the readership of the publication. Writing a comparative analysis means more than simply summarizing the different arguments. Instead, you will first be describing the target audience, and then making an argument about the two texts, using as support specific examples from the articles you select. For instance, you may claim that one argument is more effective than another for its target audience because of the reliability and quantity of its support (i.e., logos). You may also make claims about the credentials or biases of the authors and their testimony or their rhetorical strategies, such as their assumptions, refutations, definitions of key terms, overall organization, choice of vocabulary, use of figurative language, or tone. Regarding the organization of your paper, the introductory paragraph should introduce the topic, the articles, and should state your claim—which article is more effective for its target audience. The body paragraphs should provide reasoning and evidence from the articles to support your claim, organized by subtopic and in a logical sequence. The conclusion should sum up your ideas and provide any final insights. Here are some questions that might help you analyze the articles:Who is the audience for the publications/articles?What is the educational level of the audiences being addressed?What are their interests/issues?What common ground do the authors share with their audience?How do the authors qualify their opinions to influence the audience?How do the authors appeal to the audience?Are the authors’ strategies effective? If not, what might make them more effective?Which author do you find more convincing in terms of his/her target audience? Why?Articles: 1) https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/21/opinion/letters… 2) https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2021-09-17…The articles may agree or disagree with each other—the point is to argue which one is more effective for its target audience.