I’m working on a business question and need an explanation to help me understand better.
describe your initial expectations on researching your chosen service organization.What specific disciplinary skills (i.e. skills learned in your major) could you apply to your chosen service organization?Write about your thoughts and feelings on researching the service organization and how you might contribute your time in the future to support the goals of the service organization and/or allow you to make a difference in the community.Based on the knowledge gained in researching your chosen service organization and concepts taught in this class on developing a mission and vision, draft a new and improved mission and vision statement for the organization. You should include not only the new mission and vision but also an appropriate rationale for the mission and vision including elements of the organization as well as required elements needed in a well written mission and vision statement. Share the new mission and vision statement you created with at least two other people capable of giving you feedback on the soundness of your new mission and vision (fellow student, volunteer, or non-profit employee, etc.). After getting feedback from the first person, revise the mission and vision statements to accommodate the new ideas or suggestions. Do this again with the second person. Document the feedback received and how you revised the statements each time. In other words, you must complete two rounds of sharing and revising your mission and vision statement. Make sure you explain what advice you followed (and why) and what advice you felt didn’t warrant changes (and why). Based on your research of the organization and in drafting the vision and mission explain how you might recommend that the organization expand the diversity of those it serves while achieving its mission. Identify diverse constituencies that might benefit from the organization’s services or with whom it could collaborate to extend its mission.Based on your research, what ethical dilemmas do you think can arise in non-profit organizations?What is required to be a good ethical leader in a non-profit organization?Examine how this service learning research required different business skills and knowledge than the assignment related to the strategic management project.
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved I’m working on a business question and need an explanation
Case Brief Project (1-2 Pages (1 page minimum and 2 page maximum), 10-12 point font size, standard font style (e.g., Garamond, Times New Roman, Arial, Calibri), and 0.5″ to 1″ margins). See examples here: student case brief examples.pdf, recent example, another case brief example.pdf, case brief example.pdf, Another Case Brief Example (over page limit though).pdf, and Case Brief Example-3.pdf.case that has been decided by the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of California from within the past 5 years, then summarize the judicial opinion in the form of a case brief (see examples above and more information below). This website should help you find a case from the US Supreme Court according to issues of interest to you: https://www.oyez.org/issues . For example, if interested in affirmative action cases, you can see a list of such cases at https://www.oyez.org/issues/155. From that list, one would usually look for a case decided by the US Supreme Court within the last 5 years; however, if the most recent case on that topic was not from within the last five years, such as Fisher v. University of Texas(see https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981), then an older case may be selected if the rationale for selecting an older case is explained in the case brief. From that Oyez webpage for the Fisher case, you can access the opinion of the case at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-981_4g15.pdf or at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/579/14-981/#tab-opinion-3589817 to summarize in your case brief (and you can also check your understanding with the summary of the case on the Oyez webpage). If you utilize a source in your case brief other than the actual opinion of the case, such as using a website like Oyez, then please cite it using any standard citation format (e.g., MLA, APA, University of Chicago, Bluebook) and include a works cited page (and put any direct quotes from it in quotation marks). The works cited page, if needed, does not count toward the page limits. That said, there is no need to utilize any source other than the actual Supreme Court opinion analyzed for the case. Other than quotation marks for any direct quotes, there is no need to cite the actual opinion for the case (only other sources, if any). Thus, a paraphrase from the actual opinion would not need to be cited.
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved Case Brief Project (1-2 Pages (1 page minimum and 2
In this week’s Workshop, you will create the first draft of your interview guide and exchange feedback with your classmates and Instructor on how to improve.Read qualitative research articles that include an interview guide, so you can become familiar with how to write questions. Use Google Scholar to look for other suggestions about writing qualitative interview questions.What is the difference between a good and a bad question? Look at the examples in the Learning Resources. Avoid the use of jargon or any of the concept words you have found in journal articles. Use a simple, conversational style of language.Patton (2016) provides helpful examples of different types of questions to ask in order to elicit rich, thick descriptions (e.g., experience and behavior questions, sensory questions). Patton also points out how interviews vary depending on the type of approach (e.g., phenomenological, narrative).To prepare for this Workshop:Review the Learning Resources for this week.Review your Current Prospectus form to draw questions from your purpose, research question title, research problem and purposeUsing the document, “Interview Guide Worksheet,†which can be found in this week’s Learning Resources, begin pulling in concepts from the literature and your framework to identify the topics for developing questions.By Day 3Develop at least 5 interview questions and save them in a Word document and post in your workshop thread.Post in your unique thread a brief explanation of how you developed your questions. Start with the research question and then describe the concepts that you wanted to explore. Attach your interview guide to your Workshop post. Be sure to cite the sources of your ideas for the questions.REFERENCESTurner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760.Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College.Why Interview? Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 3rd Edition by Seidman, I. Copyright 2006 by Teachers College Press. Reprinted by permission of Teachers College Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.Chapter 1, “Why Interview†(pp. 7–14)
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved In this week’s Workshop, you will create the first draft
An essay prompt (please, read before typing your answers): Write a short essay addressing all five parts of the prompt. (About 3-5 pages, double space, standard margins and font should be enough)! Use examples to illustrating concepts and arguments that you use and explain in your essays. Feel free to use the examples discussed in readings and in class). If you quote or paraphrase someone, give a source (but I do not care about a list of references, or any formal footnotes, etc.; it’s not a research paper).A prompt / question: (10 points total, 2 points for each part)What is Traditional Skepticism about the external world? Explain. Your explanation should include the concepts of external world and perceptual belief. Give some examples of perceptual beliefs (about external world) and some examples of other beliefs that are not about the external world. (For full credit, you need to give at least one example of each kind of belief.)What is Methodological (“Cartesianâ€) Skepticism about the external world? How is Methodological Skepticism different from Traditional Skepticism? Explain!Skeptics argue that, in order to have knowledge, an agent must have absolute (or metaphysical) certainty. Using convincing examples, explain the concept of absolute certainty. Non-skeptics argue that, in order to know, we must have practical certainty. Explain this concept using convincing examples. Explain how a skeptic may argue that we never have absolute certainty about any perceptual belief and thus never know any perceptual belief. (Hint: Feel free to use one of the radical skeptical hypotheses introduced and discussed in class and readings.)Explain how a non-skeptic might argue that sometimes we know something about the external world. Relate your answer to the concept of practical certainty and various theories of justification.Main readings:Blackburn, Chapter 1, “Knowledgeâ€Truncellito, “Epistemology†http://www.iep.utm.edu/epistemo/Supplementary reading:Stephen Hetherington, “Gettier Problems†https://www.iep.utm.edu/gettier/ (a very clear explanation of Gettier Problem (including multiple examples) and a review of possible solutions to it)Matthias Steup, “The Analysis of Knowledge†http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/Peter Klein, “Skepticism†http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved An essay prompt (please, read before typing your answers): Write
Subjective: A patient presents to your primary care office today with chief complaint of insomnia. Patient is 75 YO with PMH of DM, HTN, and MDD. Her husband of 41 years passed away 10 months ago. Since then, she states her depression has gotten worse as well as her sleep habits. The patient has no previous history of depression prior to her husband’s death. She is awake, alert, and oriented x3. Patient normally sees PCP once or twice a year. Patient denies any suicidal ideations. Patient arrived at the office today by private vehicle. Patient currently takes the following medications:Â
Current weight: 88 kg
Current height: 64 inches
Temp: 98.6 degrees F
BP: 132/86Â
REFERENCES SHOULD BE APA 7 EDITION ONLYÂ
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS PLEASEÂ
Post a response to each of the following:
List three questions you might ask the patient if she were in your office. Provide a rationale for why you might ask these questions.Â
Identify people in the patient’s life you would need to speak to or get feedback from to further assess the patient’s situation. Include specific questions you might ask these people and why.Â
Explain what, if any, physical exams, and diagnostic tests would be appropriate for the patient and how the results would be used.Â
List a differential diagnosis for the patient. Identify the one that you think is most likely and explain why.Â
List two pharmacologic agents and their dosing that would be appropriate for the patient’s antidepressant therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. From a mechanism of action perspective, provide a rationale for why you might choose one agent over the other.Â
For the drug therapy you select, identify any contraindications to use or alterations in dosing that may need to be considered based on ethical prescribing or decision-making. Discuss why the contraindication/alteration you identify exists. That is, what would be problematic with the use of this drug in individuals based on ethical prescribing guidelines or decision-making?
Include any “check points†(i.e., follow-up data at Week 4, 8, 12, etc.), and indicate any therapeutic changes that you might make based on possible outcomes that may happen given your treatment options chosen.Â
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved Subjective: A patient presents to your primary care office today
PRACTICUM ORGANIZATION: Connect For Health (located In Rhode Island)
Evaluate two examples of public speaking and discuss reasons why each could positively or negatively impact the ability to effectively disseminate information regarding public health.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read “Ten Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me When I Became a Health Officer,” by Frieden, from American Journal of Public Health (2016).
URL:
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303204
Read “Charismatic Leadership: Strategies for Effecting Social Change,†by Fiol, Harris, and House, from Leadership Quarterly (1999).
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984399000211
Read “Shapes and Timing in Charismatic Speech – Evidence From Sounds and Melodies,” by Niebuhr, Thumm, and Michalsky, from 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody (2018).
URL:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2f72/928360e36ec6afa9d6d32d01f08acbc23622.pdf
Read “The Science of Charismatic Voices: How One Man Was Viewed as Authoritarian, Then Benevolent,” by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) from Science Daily (2014).
URL:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141029203947.htm
Explore the Resources and Tools page of the Public Health Foundation (PHF) website.
URL:
http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Pages/default.aspx?showResources=false&type=Training
Read “Resume and Cover Letter Writing Guide,” located on the Balance Careers website.
URL:
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/resume-and-cover-letter-writing-guide-2063178
Explore the Center for Public Health Practice and Professional Development page of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.
URL:
https://www.apha.org/about-apha/centers-and-programs/center-for-professional-development
Read “5 Steps to Charismatic Speaking and Leadership,” by Guarino, located on the Institute of Public Speaking website to complete Topic 10 DQ2.
URL:
https://www.instituteofpublicspeaking.com/charisma/5-steps-to-charismatic-speaking-leadership/
Watch “Top 10 Most Powerful Orators in History,” by WatchMojo.com (2016), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved PRACTICUM ORGANIZATION: Connect For Health (located In Rhode Island) Evaluate
The concept of judicial review was pioneered by the United States. Some maintain that one of the reasons the doctrine was readily accepted in this country was that it fit well with the checks and balances designed by the founders. Today, all established constitutional democracies have some form of judicial review — the power to rule on the constitutionality of laws —but its form varies from country to country.
For example, Canada’s Supreme Court can exercise judicial review but is barred from doing so if a law includes a provision explicitly prohibiting such review. France has a Constitutional Council that rules on the constitutionality of laws before the laws take effect. Laws can be referred to the council for prior review by the president, the prime minister, and the heads of the two chambers of parliament. Prior review is also an option in Germany and Italy, if requested by the national or a regional government. In contrast, the United States Supreme Court does not give advisory opinions; the Supreme Court will render a decision only when there is an actual dispute concerning an issue.
Assignment:
(1) Research judicial review in either: (1) the countries mentioned above or (2) any other country (Switzerland, Australia, Japan).
(2) In your own words, write a minimum 250-word post:
     (a) describing the laws/statutes/rules/court cases governing judicial review of the country you chose;
    (b) describing the judicial review process;Â
    (c) finding an example of judicial review protecting human rights from the country you researched (here is a helpful website: https://www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/ (Links to an external site.)); and
   (d) proposing at least one action (that is not already in place) that the country can take to better promote human rights.
Research Information/Suggestions:
1. Â Please use reliable and credible search engines (please do not use Wikipedia). Â
2. Â This website has great information on research skills: http://lib.usfsp.edu/sb.php?subject_id=136086 (Links to an external site.).
3. I suggest using either Westlaw or Lexis-Nexis which can be found under Databases once you log into the USF Library network. Â
4. Â Don’t hesitate to ask a Librarian for assistance (https://lib.stpetersburg.usf.edu/RIHome/allguides (Links to an external site.))!
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved The concept of judicial review was pioneered by the United
Option #1: Eco-Leadership Discourse, presentationYou are an organization development and leadership consultant who has been hired to work with the CEO of FASTPACE. FASTPACE is a global corporation with operations in China, Mexico, and Germany. English is the business language used at the company.ASTPACE is in the highly competitive technology industry. The CEO has long held the belief that an organization needs some kind of “glue” to hold it together if it is to survive over time. The CEO recently read Western’s (2013) work on Eco-Leadership and wants to know more. You and the CEO agree that the two of you will explore the Eco-leadership concepts within the context of FASTPACE history, current status, and vision before opening up discussions with the rest of the leadership team. You and the CEO agree that Western’s (2013) suggested reflection points are an excellent way to open dialogue. Those points include:What does it mean that organizations are ecosystems within ecosystems?What are the advantages of distributing leadership throughout an organization?Reflect on how Eco-leadership works internally to support organizational change and, at the same time, looks outward, taking an environmental and social stance. These two positions are traditionally separated, but reflect on how these two activities are complementary and connected. (Western, 2013, p. 280)The CEO is traveling internationally for the next month and wants to keep things moving, so you suggested a slide presentation with voice over* might work across time and geographic barriers.Your job is to develop and store the presentation in the company’s “share drive” so the CEO can access it from any location or any time. You have one week to complete the presentation.Requirements:10 to 12 slides—not including the required title slide and references— include citations at the bottom of each slide.Cite two (2) specific examples of international companies that might exemplify one or more components of eco-Leadership to show credibility.Font no smaller than 24 pt. for slide bodyDevelop slide titles that explicitly tell the story of what you want the team to know; if you were to look at the slide titles only from beginning to end, a storyline would unfold.Use phrases rather than complete sentences on slides; lists require parallel form (e.g., ending in ing or ed).
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved Option #1: Eco-Leadership Discourse, presentationYou are an organization development and
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan It is one of
DRAFT DPP SECTION 1.1 AND 1.2This assignment is a further development of the capstone project topic. The goal is for you to clearly articulate the topic that will be the focus of your study along with a rationale that supports the need for further investigation of this topic.You will need to clearly and succinctly articulate what is known about the topic, what isn’t known, and what the consequences are for not studying this topic.You will be asked to support your thinking with information from the literature.This assignment is a draft. You will use the feedback you get from your instructor to complete the final version of Section 1 of the DHS DPP Form [DOCX] in Week 7.InstructionsClearly state your planned site and the planned participants.Use at least 10 sources to support the assertions and ideas presented in this assignment. Some of the references should be from journal sources and some should be more directly related to the planned site and local community in relation to the topic.Include the references at the end of section 1.2.Address Section 1.1 of the DPP: Capstone Topic. Use the required details described in section 1.1.In paragraph format state the topic of the capstone project and include the other details requested for section 1.1.Clearly state the objective of the capstone project (The objective of this project is …..).Clearly state the significance of the topic to Human Services.Address Section 1.2 of the DPP: The Research Problem.Write a brief statement that fully describes the problem being addressed in the capstone project. The problem to be addressed should be explicitly stated, not implied. Existing literature and key findings should be summarized and used to support your rationale. Use at least 5 citations to support the assertions made in this section.First Paragraph: Write a brief statement that fully describes the problem being addressed. This paragraph introduces the problem that is informing the research and warrants the need for this study. Begin this paragraph with the statement, “The problem is….”Second Paragraph: Identify the need for the study (which is related directly to the problem presented in the first paragraph). It must clearly identify a gap in current practice, service, process, policy or programs. It must clearly identify the need for the research and the desired outcome.
https://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.png00adminhttps://allpaperwriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cover-300x123.pngadmin2024-09-06 17:16:262024-09-06 17:16:26solved DRAFT DPP SECTION 1.1 AND 1.2This assignment is a further
solved I’m working on a business question and need an explanation
/in /by adminI’m working on a business question and need an explanation to help me understand better.
describe your initial expectations on researching your chosen service organization.What specific disciplinary skills (i.e. skills learned in your major) could you apply to your chosen service organization?Write about your thoughts and feelings on researching the service organization and how you might contribute your time in the future to support the goals of the service organization and/or allow you to make a difference in the community.Based on the knowledge gained in researching your chosen service organization and concepts taught in this class on developing a mission and vision, draft a new and improved mission and vision statement for the organization. You should include not only the new mission and vision but also an appropriate rationale for the mission and vision including elements of the organization as well as required elements needed in a well written mission and vision statement. Share the new mission and vision statement you created with at least two other people capable of giving you feedback on the soundness of your new mission and vision (fellow student, volunteer, or non-profit employee, etc.). After getting feedback from the first person, revise the mission and vision statements to accommodate the new ideas or suggestions. Do this again with the second person. Document the feedback received and how you revised the statements each time. In other words, you must complete two rounds of sharing and revising your mission and vision statement. Make sure you explain what advice you followed (and why) and what advice you felt didn’t warrant changes (and why). Based on your research of the organization and in drafting the vision and mission explain how you might recommend that the organization expand the diversity of those it serves while achieving its mission. Identify diverse constituencies that might benefit from the organization’s services or with whom it could collaborate to extend its mission.Based on your research, what ethical dilemmas do you think can arise in non-profit organizations?What is required to be a good ethical leader in a non-profit organization?Examine how this service learning research required different business skills and knowledge than the assignment related to the strategic management project.
solved Case Brief Project (1-2 Pages (1 page minimum and 2
/in /by adminCase Brief Project (1-2 Pages (1 page minimum and 2 page maximum), 10-12 point font size, standard font style (e.g., Garamond, Times New Roman, Arial, Calibri), and 0.5″ to 1″ margins). See examples here: student case brief examples.pdf, recent example, another case brief example.pdf, case brief example.pdf, Another Case Brief Example (over page limit though).pdf, and Case Brief Example-3.pdf.case that has been decided by the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of California from within the past 5 years, then summarize the judicial opinion in the form of a case brief (see examples above and more information below). This website should help you find a case from the US Supreme Court according to issues of interest to you: https://www.oyez.org/issues . For example, if interested in affirmative action cases, you can see a list of such cases at https://www.oyez.org/issues/155. From that list, one would usually look for a case decided by the US Supreme Court within the last 5 years; however, if the most recent case on that topic was not from within the last five years, such as Fisher v. University of Texas(see https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/14-981), then an older case may be selected if the rationale for selecting an older case is explained in the case brief. From that Oyez webpage for the Fisher case, you can access the opinion of the case at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-981_4g15.pdf or at https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/579/14-981/#tab-opinion-3589817 to summarize in your case brief (and you can also check your understanding with the summary of the case on the Oyez webpage). If you utilize a source in your case brief other than the actual opinion of the case, such as using a website like Oyez, then please cite it using any standard citation format (e.g., MLA, APA, University of Chicago, Bluebook) and include a works cited page (and put any direct quotes from it in quotation marks). The works cited page, if needed, does not count toward the page limits. That said, there is no need to utilize any source other than the actual Supreme Court opinion analyzed for the case. Other than quotation marks for any direct quotes, there is no need to cite the actual opinion for the case (only other sources, if any). Thus, a paraphrase from the actual opinion would not need to be cited.
solved In this week’s Workshop, you will create the first draft
/in /by adminIn this week’s Workshop, you will create the first draft of your interview guide and exchange feedback with your classmates and Instructor on how to improve.Read qualitative research articles that include an interview guide, so you can become familiar with how to write questions. Use Google Scholar to look for other suggestions about writing qualitative interview questions.What is the difference between a good and a bad question? Look at the examples in the Learning Resources. Avoid the use of jargon or any of the concept words you have found in journal articles. Use a simple, conversational style of language.Patton (2016) provides helpful examples of different types of questions to ask in order to elicit rich, thick descriptions (e.g., experience and behavior questions, sensory questions). Patton also points out how interviews vary depending on the type of approach (e.g., phenomenological, narrative).To prepare for this Workshop:Review the Learning Resources for this week.Review your Current Prospectus form to draw questions from your purpose, research question title, research problem and purposeUsing the document, “Interview Guide Worksheet,†which can be found in this week’s Learning Resources, begin pulling in concepts from the literature and your framework to identify the topics for developing questions.By Day 3Develop at least 5 interview questions and save them in a Word document and post in your workshop thread.Post in your unique thread a brief explanation of how you developed your questions. Start with the research question and then describe the concepts that you wanted to explore. Attach your interview guide to your Workshop post. Be sure to cite the sources of your ideas for the questions.REFERENCESTurner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760.Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College.Why Interview? Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, 3rd Edition by Seidman, I. Copyright 2006 by Teachers College Press. Reprinted by permission of Teachers College Press via the Copyright Clearance Center.Chapter 1, “Why Interview†(pp. 7–14)
solved An essay prompt (please, read before typing your answers): Write
/in /by adminAn essay prompt (please, read before typing your answers): Write a short essay addressing all five parts of the prompt. (About 3-5 pages, double space, standard margins and font should be enough)! Use examples to illustrating concepts and arguments that you use and explain in your essays. Feel free to use the examples discussed in readings and in class). If you quote or paraphrase someone, give a source (but I do not care about a list of references, or any formal footnotes, etc.; it’s not a research paper).A prompt / question: (10 points total, 2 points for each part)What is Traditional Skepticism about the external world? Explain. Your explanation should include the concepts of external world and perceptual belief. Give some examples of perceptual beliefs (about external world) and some examples of other beliefs that are not about the external world. (For full credit, you need to give at least one example of each kind of belief.)What is Methodological (“Cartesianâ€) Skepticism about the external world? How is Methodological Skepticism different from Traditional Skepticism? Explain!Skeptics argue that, in order to have knowledge, an agent must have absolute (or metaphysical) certainty. Using convincing examples, explain the concept of absolute certainty. Non-skeptics argue that, in order to know, we must have practical certainty. Explain this concept using convincing examples. Explain how a skeptic may argue that we never have absolute certainty about any perceptual belief and thus never know any perceptual belief. (Hint: Feel free to use one of the radical skeptical hypotheses introduced and discussed in class and readings.)Explain how a non-skeptic might argue that sometimes we know something about the external world. Relate your answer to the concept of practical certainty and various theories of justification.Main readings:Blackburn, Chapter 1, “Knowledgeâ€Truncellito, “Epistemology†http://www.iep.utm.edu/epistemo/Supplementary reading:Stephen Hetherington, “Gettier Problems†https://www.iep.utm.edu/gettier/ (a very clear explanation of Gettier Problem (including multiple examples) and a review of possible solutions to it)Matthias Steup, “The Analysis of Knowledge†http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/Peter Klein, “Skepticism†http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/
solved Subjective: A patient presents to your primary care office today
/in /by adminSubjective: A patient presents to your primary care office today with chief complaint of insomnia. Patient is 75 YO with PMH of DM, HTN, and MDD. Her husband of 41 years passed away 10 months ago. Since then, she states her depression has gotten worse as well as her sleep habits. The patient has no previous history of depression prior to her husband’s death. She is awake, alert, and oriented x3. Patient normally sees PCP once or twice a year. Patient denies any suicidal ideations. Patient arrived at the office today by private vehicle. Patient currently takes the following medications:Â
Metformin 500mg BIDÂ
Januvia 100mg dailyÂ
Losartan 100mg dailyÂ
HCTZ 25mg dailyÂ
Sertraline 100mg dailyÂ
Current weight: 88 kg
Current height: 64 inches
Temp: 98.6 degrees F
BP: 132/86Â
REFERENCES SHOULD BE APA 7 EDITION ONLYÂ
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS PLEASEÂ
Post a response to each of the following:
List three questions you might ask the patient if she were in your office. Provide a rationale for why you might ask these questions.Â
Identify people in the patient’s life you would need to speak to or get feedback from to further assess the patient’s situation. Include specific questions you might ask these people and why.Â
Explain what, if any, physical exams, and diagnostic tests would be appropriate for the patient and how the results would be used.Â
List a differential diagnosis for the patient. Identify the one that you think is most likely and explain why.Â
List two pharmacologic agents and their dosing that would be appropriate for the patient’s antidepressant therapy based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. From a mechanism of action perspective, provide a rationale for why you might choose one agent over the other.Â
For the drug therapy you select, identify any contraindications to use or alterations in dosing that may need to be considered based on ethical prescribing or decision-making. Discuss why the contraindication/alteration you identify exists. That is, what would be problematic with the use of this drug in individuals based on ethical prescribing guidelines or decision-making?
Include any “check points†(i.e., follow-up data at Week 4, 8, 12, etc.), and indicate any therapeutic changes that you might make based on possible outcomes that may happen given your treatment options chosen.Â
solved PRACTICUM ORGANIZATION: Connect For Health (located In Rhode Island) Evaluate
/in /by adminPRACTICUM ORGANIZATION: Connect For Health (located In Rhode Island)
Evaluate two examples of public speaking and discuss reasons why each could positively or negatively impact the ability to effectively disseminate information regarding public health.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read “Ten Things I Wish Someone Had Told Me When I Became a Health Officer,” by Frieden, from American Journal of Public Health (2016).
URL:
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303204
Read “Charismatic Leadership: Strategies for Effecting Social Change,†by Fiol, Harris, and House, from Leadership Quarterly (1999).
URL:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984399000211
Read “Shapes and Timing in Charismatic Speech – Evidence From Sounds and Melodies,” by Niebuhr, Thumm, and Michalsky, from 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody (2018).
URL:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2f72/928360e36ec6afa9d6d32d01f08acbc23622.pdf
Read “The Science of Charismatic Voices: How One Man Was Viewed as Authoritarian, Then Benevolent,” by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) from Science Daily (2014).
URL:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/10/141029203947.htm
Explore the Resources and Tools page of the Public Health Foundation (PHF) website.
URL:
http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Pages/default.aspx?showResources=false&type=Training
Read “Resume and Cover Letter Writing Guide,” located on the Balance Careers website.
URL:
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/resume-and-cover-letter-writing-guide-2063178
Explore the Center for Public Health Practice and Professional Development page of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.
URL:
https://www.apha.org/about-apha/centers-and-programs/center-for-professional-development
Read “5 Steps to Charismatic Speaking and Leadership,” by Guarino, located on the Institute of Public Speaking website to complete Topic 10 DQ2.
URL:
https://www.instituteofpublicspeaking.com/charisma/5-steps-to-charismatic-speaking-leadership/
Watch “Top 10 Most Powerful Orators in History,” by WatchMojo.com (2016), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author
solved The concept of judicial review was pioneered by the United
/in /by adminThe concept of judicial review was pioneered by the United States. Some maintain that one of the reasons the doctrine was readily accepted in this country was that it fit well with the checks and balances designed by the founders. Today, all established constitutional democracies have some form of judicial review — the power to rule on the constitutionality of laws —but its form varies from country to country.
For example, Canada’s Supreme Court can exercise judicial review but is barred from doing so if a law includes a provision explicitly prohibiting such review. France has a Constitutional Council that rules on the constitutionality of laws before the laws take effect. Laws can be referred to the council for prior review by the president, the prime minister, and the heads of the two chambers of parliament. Prior review is also an option in Germany and Italy, if requested by the national or a regional government. In contrast, the United States Supreme Court does not give advisory opinions; the Supreme Court will render a decision only when there is an actual dispute concerning an issue.
Assignment:
(1) Research judicial review in either: (1) the countries mentioned above or (2) any other country (Switzerland, Australia, Japan).
(2) In your own words, write a minimum 250-word post:
     (a) describing the laws/statutes/rules/court cases governing judicial review of the country you chose;
    (b) describing the judicial review process;Â
    (c) finding an example of judicial review protecting human rights from the country you researched (here is a helpful website: https://www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/ (Links to an external site.)); and
   (d) proposing at least one action (that is not already in place) that the country can take to better promote human rights.
Research Information/Suggestions:
1. Â Please use reliable and credible search engines (please do not use Wikipedia). Â
2. Â This website has great information on research skills: http://lib.usfsp.edu/sb.php?subject_id=136086 (Links to an external site.).
3. I suggest using either Westlaw or Lexis-Nexis which can be found under Databases once you log into the USF Library network. Â
4. Â Don’t hesitate to ask a Librarian for assistance (https://lib.stpetersburg.usf.edu/RIHome/allguides (Links to an external site.))!
solved Option #1: Eco-Leadership Discourse, presentationYou are an organization development and
/in /by adminOption #1: Eco-Leadership Discourse, presentationYou are an organization development and leadership consultant who has been hired to work with the CEO of FASTPACE. FASTPACE is a global corporation with operations in China, Mexico, and Germany. English is the business language used at the company.ASTPACE is in the highly competitive technology industry. The CEO has long held the belief that an organization needs some kind of “glue” to hold it together if it is to survive over time. The CEO recently read Western’s (2013) work on Eco-Leadership and wants to know more. You and the CEO agree that the two of you will explore the Eco-leadership concepts within the context of FASTPACE history, current status, and vision before opening up discussions with the rest of the leadership team. You and the CEO agree that Western’s (2013) suggested reflection points are an excellent way to open dialogue. Those points include:What does it mean that organizations are ecosystems within ecosystems?What are the advantages of distributing leadership throughout an organization?Reflect on how Eco-leadership works internally to support organizational change and, at the same time, looks outward, taking an environmental and social stance. These two positions are traditionally separated, but reflect on how these two activities are complementary and connected. (Western, 2013, p. 280)The CEO is traveling internationally for the next month and wants to keep things moving, so you suggested a slide presentation with voice over* might work across time and geographic barriers.Your job is to develop and store the presentation in the company’s “share drive” so the CEO can access it from any location or any time. You have one week to complete the presentation.Requirements:10 to 12 slides—not including the required title slide and references— include citations at the bottom of each slide.Cite two (2) specific examples of international companies that might exemplify one or more components of eco-Leadership to show credibility.Font no smaller than 24 pt. for slide bodyDevelop slide titles that explicitly tell the story of what you want the team to know; if you were to look at the slide titles only from beginning to end, a storyline would unfold.Use phrases rather than complete sentences on slides; lists require parallel form (e.g., ending in ing or ed).
solved Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan It is one of
/in /by adminAssignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan It is one of the most cliché of clichés, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival. As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.To Prepare: Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace. This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas. Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership. The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentatioChange Implementation and Management PlanCreate a narrated PowerPoint presentation of 5 or 6 slides with video that presents a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.) A description of the change being proposed Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace Details about the type and scope of the proposed change Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change Identification of a change management team (by title/role) A plan for communicating the change you propose A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose
solved DRAFT DPP SECTION 1.1 AND 1.2This assignment is a further
/in /by adminDRAFT DPP SECTION 1.1 AND 1.2This assignment is a further development of the capstone project topic. The goal is for you to clearly articulate the topic that will be the focus of your study along with a rationale that supports the need for further investigation of this topic.You will need to clearly and succinctly articulate what is known about the topic, what isn’t known, and what the consequences are for not studying this topic.You will be asked to support your thinking with information from the literature.This assignment is a draft. You will use the feedback you get from your instructor to complete the final version of Section 1 of the DHS DPP Form [DOCX] in Week 7.InstructionsClearly state your planned site and the planned participants.Use at least 10 sources to support the assertions and ideas presented in this assignment. Some of the references should be from journal sources and some should be more directly related to the planned site and local community in relation to the topic.Include the references at the end of section 1.2.Address Section 1.1 of the DPP: Capstone Topic. Use the required details described in section 1.1.In paragraph format state the topic of the capstone project and include the other details requested for section 1.1.Clearly state the objective of the capstone project (The objective of this project is …..).Clearly state the significance of the topic to Human Services.Address Section 1.2 of the DPP: The Research Problem.Write a brief statement that fully describes the problem being addressed in the capstone project. The problem to be addressed should be explicitly stated, not implied. Existing literature and key findings should be summarized and used to support your rationale. Use at least 5 citations to support the assertions made in this section.First Paragraph: Write a brief statement that fully describes the problem being addressed. This paragraph introduces the problem that is informing the research and warrants the need for this study. Begin this paragraph with the statement, “The problem is….”Second Paragraph: Identify the need for the study (which is related directly to the problem presented in the first paragraph). It must clearly identify a gap in current practice, service, process, policy or programs. It must clearly identify the need for the research and the desired outcome.