For this essay I want you to apply the four theories of justice we have learned about to the two historical episodes we have learned about. What would Liberalism, Republicanism, Conservatism and Socialism have to say about the American and French Revolutions? 
Now that topic is very broad so I want to focus it a bit. I want you to say at what point in each revolution each theory would say that the revolution went astray, or should have gone in another direction. To be clear this is about when the revolutionaries went too far, not the powers that were opposing the revolutions. So I don’t want to hear about ways King George III or King Louis XVI made mistakes. They are not revolutionaries.
So this will involve making eight applications of theory to history. Where did Liberalism say the American Revolution went wrong, or could have done better? Where did Liberalism say the French Revolution went wrong, or could have done better? Where did Republicanism say the American Revolution went wrong, or could have done better? And so on for each of the four theories for both revolutions.
And finally I want you to say where you personally think things went wrong, or could have gone better in each Revolution.

Choose one of the topics below and prepare an annotated bibliography about it:The psychological process in the development of a terroristIdentification with a terrorist/violent groupRole of leadership in terrorism/political violenceRole of organization in mobilizing terrorism/political violencePlease make the title the topic you choose for this assignment.Students are required to write annotations for 6 and 8 articles, respectively.You are free to choose any scholarly (e.g. peer-reviewed) article, except for the ones assigned in this syllabus, to annotate as long as they are relevant to the topic.The articles must be from academic resources such as peer-reviewed articles, a chapter from an edited book, a paper from an academic conference, etc. Note that journalistic reports are not academic resources.The annotations do not have to be extensive. The recommended length of each annotation is about 100-150 words per article.Each annotation should have a brief review of the main argument and salient points, and your comment about how the article contributes to our understanding of the chosen topic.You are free to use any standard citation style including but not limited to APA, MLA, Chicago Style, etc.

I’m working on a criminal justice discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Overview:For this discussion board, you will apply the right to remain silent to a scenario.Scenario: You are a newly promoted detective working on a burglary case where several ATMs were broken into over the past few weeks. Thousands of dollars have been taken. Surveillance video reveals a limited description of a male wearing all black clothing, including a mask and gloves. The same shoe tread pattern has been recovered from two different scenes. You have developed a suspect named Jim Davis. An anonymous tipster told you Jim is the one who has been committing the burglaries. You cannot act on the tip alone and would like to have more information. Your detective supervisor has recommended you attempt a non-custodial interview with Jim.Instructions:In your initial post:Discuss the strategy you would use to set up the non-custodial interview.What would you do to ensure it remained non-custodial?When might the interview transition from non-custodial to custodial?Discuss when the right to remain silent would and would not apply.Support your strategy and conclusions with Constitutional case laws.

write a thesis-driven rhetorical analysis essay using specific, textual evidence (direct quotations) to support your assertions. Your thesis should articulate an important facet or idea (remember theme?)of the movie, and how Jordan Peele articulates its importance. Your entire paper should focus on that theme. Remember, a Rhetorical Analysis is NOT your OPINION of what is going on in the book/movie or text you are analyzing. You are to simply TELL the reader what Peele is saying, and how he uses the rhetorical devices to narrate this idea.
Some Tips:

Argument elements such as the claim of the author, the provided support, and what connects these elements.
Unusual language especially if the language is loaded. (what kind of language does Peele use and what does this define?) Remember, ethos, pathos, and logos. ( Do not write “He uses pathos by showing the maid crying” Instead place all these devices in the description without defining them as logos, pathos, and ethos.
Examples that the author uses and why he or she chose them.
The purpose of the work or goal.
Classification of the work, illustration or example
How the author narrates a story, the used analogy, definitions and descriptions

Current Research Question – What effects can a 4-day work week have on turnover rates in non-profit organizations?Purpose – Improve work-life balance of non-profit employees to decrease turnover rates in non-profit organizationsAssignment: Post a 1-2 page response to the following prompts:Present your research question as two or three versions, based on the different approaches you have explored that seem most appropriate to your research problem and purpose.Make a case for why each approach would work.Identify the approach you believe best fits your research question. Then, re-formulate the question based on the approach you selected.Describe how the approach you selected will direct the procedures you will later develop.Summarize your choice of theoretical framework for your prospectus. Justify how your choice aligns with your current choice of research question and approach. If they are not aligned, choose a more appropriate framework.Given your choice of approach, describe what data collection tools will be most appropriate to consider. Note: This is not a commitment to use all of the tools you identify; rather, it is meant to be a reflection on what is possible given your choice of approach.