In your first post, respond to the following:

Explain Habit 5 in your own words and describe how this can help your career path as a leader in health care.
What does Mr. Covey truly mean by “Diagnose Before you Prescribe” in this video?
What is symbolized by the pair of glasses? Give three examples of how the pair of glasses affects your leadership style or others around you.

Post responses critiquing two classmates’ solutions. Describe why you agree or disagree with their choices. Offer any suggestions about how this can affect leadership styles of health care employees.

Student 1:
Hi everyone,
Habit 5 explained by Covey states that most people tend to listen with the intent to reply and not to understand the person they are listening too, and that is a corruption according to Covey in most communication situations. In other words, we tend to spend that time listening by trying to think of what to say in response instead of trying to understand the other person.
According to Covey, the meaning of “Diagnose Before Prescribing” means that individuals should try to understand the problem before coming up with ideas in order to address/solve the solution. In my eyes, the glasses represent a solution that can’t always be solved without listening and understanding. Just because someone is wearing them and is being told they are great, they are healthy, etc, does not mean that to glasses will work and help them be able to see. Three ways this affects my leadership would be in certain aspects and/or part of my personality as a leader when it comes to my communication. The glasses can help me understand that not all words can have answers for a solution, meaning that I cannot always solve a problem by having an “answer” for an individual. As a leader, it can also help me understand that real communication is only finished when the other person takes the time to understand, not the time to “answer” the person being listened to. And lastly, it will help strengthen the lesson of what real listening and communication is for both myself and maybe even my employees.

Student 2:
Hello everyone!
In my opinion, Habit 5 is all about communicating effectively with others. Habit 5 is based on the idea that in order to fully be understood, we must first learn to understand others. In other words, people should recognize the importance of listening to others, taking in their opinions and ideas, without the intent of judging or trying to enhance your own agenda. Habit 5 can benefit my career path as a leader in healthcare, as it directly affects the relationships with the people I work with and manage. Learning to listen and empathize with other employees, especially those who I work closely with, will help build healthy inter-office relationships. In return, employees will feel more safe and secure in their ability to speak up and participate in discussions.
The concept of “Diagnose Before You Prescribe,” as stated by Franklin Covey, is essentially another way to describe the process of fully thinking things through before acting or speaking. In fact, people do it everyday, especially when thinking about what to say or do in a specific situation. People should look to fully understand the whole situation, before trying to make any moves to resolve the issue or problem. Diagnosing problems demonstrates a person’s ability to not jump to conclusions, not act impulsively, and ensures more effective outcomes and solutions.
The pair of glasses truly symbolizes the paradigms or beliefs that people use to view themselves and everything around them each and every day. The glasses people to choose to wear everyday helps inform their opinions and actions. However, if we rely on only seeing the world through one lens, we can easily misjudge and miss opportunities. In fact, Franklin Covey states, “If we’re too invested in our point of view, we may miss seeing the true potential in ourselves or others — stunting growth” (Davis, 2017). Whereas, if we look through multiple lenses, and take other peoples’ views into account, we are able to see the world from multiple perspectives. In addition, the pair of glasses directly influences my own leadership style and others around me. For example, communication with other employees will become increased, allowing for more open discussion and dialogue to share ideas and opinions. Secondly, the relationships I build within the workplace would be extended, generating higher-quality work, in both myself and the other employees. Lastly, the glasses will enhance my ability to listen and empathize with other employees. Thus, generating a greater trust between my employees and myself.
Davis, T. (2017, September 1). Wear Glasses That Work. FranklinCovey. https://www.franklincovey.com/blog/2017/9/29/wear_glasses_that_wo/.

My topic is that i want to focus on  Immanuel Kant’s deontological ethics (Kant specifically addresses why it is that suicide is morally wrong). You MUST use the attached worksheet to complete this assignment.
Final Goal: To write a philosophy paper, per the guidelines detailed in “Writing a philosophy paper” in week two. You will research and discuss one of the theories listed below. You need to pick one you understand and like or appreciate. You should strive to demonstrate adequate understanding of the theory first in the paper. At least half of the paper should be a discussion of the various components of the theory. Work to demonstrate your understanding of the theory. Then, you will apply the theory to a discussion of a contemporary topic. See the example at the bottom of this page. 
Week Three Goal: To complete the Proposal/Source Evaluation Worksheet. After crafting your introduction paragraph (or two) per the instructions in “Writing a Philosophy Paper” you will list and evaluate a minimum of three resources you intend to use in completing in the final paper.  Keep the following in mind as you compile the resources:

At least one resource must come from either the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy or the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Depending on the philosophy or philosopher some alternatives may be acceptable – check with your instructor).
It is good to find at least one peer-reviewed paper on either the philosophy or the topic or both. See the Philosophy Program Guide for links to many helpful resources. 
One can be from a credible internet resource such as Crash Course videos. TED or other scholarly, video resource. Depending on the topic, you may use websites or other credible online resources. What will be the best resource will depend on your topic.
The final paper should be no less than 1500 words, be double-spaced, and contain properly formatted citations and references. Ideally, MLA or APA will be used, but if your degree normally uses another system, check with your instructor.
NO WIKIPEDIA or other open resources.
There is no minimum word count on the “summary” section but must be at least several well-crafted sentences to describe the contents of the source and how you plan to use it. It should NOT be just copied and pasted from the resource. [Note, this list is not meant to be carved in stone or a complete list. As you research, your final list could be longer or contain some different sources.].

Theories to choose from (You must pick one of these or some other accepted moral theory – be sure you do some research before choosing. You will be using the theory to justify your position on the contemporary issue):

Care Ethics
Contractarianism
Divine Command Theory
Ethical Egoism (Ayn Rand)
Immanuel Kant’s Deontological Ethics
John Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism
Natural Law Theory
Prima Facie Duties (W. D. Ross)
Rights Theory ( use https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights/ )
Virtue Theory (Aristotle)
If there is another theory you have read about and intrigued with, consult your instructor for permission or guidance

Contemporary topics: This is much more open-ended. When considering a contemporary topic, think about current events, some ethical issue you are passionate about, or an ethical issue you know a lot about, or perhaps even encounter in your professional or personal life.  If you have questions regarding selecting an issue please ask your Instructor for guidance. Just keep in mind the goal is to use your theory to argue for or against some position on that topic. 
Here is a link to a list of 30 ethical issues. Here is another website with dozens of topics and cases.
The Instructor’s feedback from this assignment may help you focus on your topic.  If you need help coming up with an idea of an ethical issue to critique with your ethical theory, you can begin by taking a look at the following website, but don’t feel constrained by this list.  This is an opportunity for you to be creative in your thinking and to do something that you are interested in learning more about!
If you have writing questions, please see the University Writing Center.
Introduction paragraph example: Say you want to write on transgender women competing in women’s sports and want to argue that it is morally right to allow these women even though they have a clear physical advantage. You choose to use W.D Ross’s Prima Facie Duties.
There has been much controversy lately about whether it is morally right to allow transgender women to compete in women’s sports. There are many voices against this, fewer in support of the practice. Using W.D Ross’s Prima Facie Duties a defense is made supporting the practice. After discussing the history and contents of the theory, the 

Part 1: Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:What are some examples of classification instruments used to determine the correctional sanctions or placement for a juvenile? How do they work? How can you measure positive change while a juvenile is in secure confinement? When is probation an effective correctional strategy? When is incarceration the best option? When are other correctional alternatives more appropriate? Which types of correctional strategies are the least effective, in your opinion, and why?PART 2: RESPOND TO RESPONSES #1: Some classification instruments used to determine the correctional sanctions or placements for a juvenile would be the community of the juvenile. As well as the family or home setting they are currently in. Sometimes being in the wrong neighborhood can be an influence in the juvenile’s behavior. These work by intake and classification of a juvenile in a detention facility. While they are awaiting court hearings and sentencing they are held in the detention facility. While they are there they are being classified with these instruments. One way to measure positive change while in a secured confinement is by having the juvenile participate in programming or self enrichment that the facility offers. This is one way you can monitor positive change in a juvenile. Probation is effective one the juvenile has served either their time in a facility or is released by the court with conditions. That’s when the probation officer monitors the juvenile in the community and if he/she violates the terms of probation they can face another charge. Incarceration would be the best option when it comes to serious violations such as murder or manslaughter, stuff that would be endanger to others that will hurt their lives.#2: So for youthful offenders there are some options for them. They can be made to help the community by doing community service. They can be placed into house arrest, placed on probation, and even be placed into an alternative home. Community service is a sanction that can benefit the offender, the community, and may reestablish faith in the juvenile justice process. Community service offers a proactive sanction that can be used to rehabilitate or punish while holding the offender accountable to the victim and/or the community. Juvenile probation programs are ideally set up to help young people correct their behaviors without removing them from their communities. The advantages of house arrest include lower costs than detention in locked facilities, decreased rates of recidivism, and the ability to monitor the wearer’s location at all times. You can see a positive change by how the juvenile acts and corrects his behavior.PART 3: Scenario: You are a probation officer or juvenile corrections officer tasked with making recommendations to a judge for a juvenile’s entire course of treatment. You can advise on the sanctions they should receive; the components of their correctional treatment; the programs, training, or institutions that should assist them; any alternatives or special conditions to consider, and; terms for their aftercare and transition back into the community.Write a 525-700-word narrative that outlines a correctional dispositional plan for a juvenile.View 1 of the selected videos from the University Library.Choose 1 of the following juveniles from the videos to use as an example case study for this week’s assignment:Donovan from Second Chance KidsRolon from Second Chance KidsShawn from Juvenile JusticeJose from Juvenile JusticeManny from Juvenile JusticeMarquese from Juvenile JusticeGina, from the Ch. 11 Critical Thinking Exercises #3 (p. 312-3)Any of the juveniles from the Week 3 court session videosNote: If you choose an example with a known correctional plan, do not propose the same plan from the original case study. Make your own recommendations for a different process for the juvenile’s treatment.Complete the following in your recommended plan for the juvenile:Summarize the outcome of the adjudication process and the disposition in this case.Describe the treatment of the juvenile in this situation.Explain the risk factors that need to be considered in the assessment of this juvenile.Explain how the combination of factors considered in this case were connected and influenced the original outcome, if any.List any additional information you would like to have before considering other correctional treatments for the juvenile.Recommend 2 alternative correctional strategies for this juvenile: 1 that includes a correctional program that exists in your state as well as 1 other potential option.Explain how you could monitor, measure, report, and support the juvenile’s progress through treatment.Justify your plan with evidence that supports your recommendations.

Law Talk Topic: 
This week we will be focusing our discussion on patient consent. You should skim Chapter 14 before proceeding with this assignment. Focus your attention on the Matter of Dubreuil case on page 391.
Scenario for Post 1
You represent the hospital, and insist that the hospital has the right to assert the state’s interest over Ms. R. E. Fusal. Ms. Fusal is refusing to accept a blood transfusion. Without it, she will die. The hospital attorney is preparing for a court hearing where the judge will determine whether to order the transfusion or enforce the patient’s refusal. What arguments can you provide to the hospital attorney? What is the hospital’s rationale for requiring this patient to receive treatment?
Scenario for Post 2
Read through the posts submitted by your fellow students for Post 1. Choose a post that interests you, and respond to it. But for this post, you no longer represent the hospital. Now, you represent Ms. R. E. Fusal. What arguments would you tell the judge on her behalf? What are your issues with the arguments presented to the judge by the hospital in Post 1?
Scenario for Post 3
Now you choose. Read through the posts submitted by the class. What is your opinion? What side seemed to have more valid arguments? Should a hospital have the right to require treatment? Why / why not? Be sure to support your opinion by citing to a fellow student’s post.

For Scenario 2
Good afternoon everyone,
As the hospital representative, I will base my arguments on the patient bill of rights to help the hospital attorney argue the case of Ms. Fusal, Ms. Fusal’s health is progressively becoming worse, and she will die if she does not accept the blood transfusion. In that case, the hospital has the ethical responsibility to prioritize the difficult decision to save the life of the patient (Pozgar, 2020). Since the patient bill of rights is categorical on the incidences of recommendation in treatment, transfer, or referral, the patient is entitled to the known risks, benefits, and alternatives so that her health is not jeopardized (Pozgar, 2020). Additionally, as the hospital representative, I will urge the attorney to make the court understand the advantages involved in Ms. Fusal’s blood transfusion. Besides, the court should understand that there is no other treatment that can help save her life. The court should order the blood transfusion based on the ruling of Judge J. Wright on Mrs. Jones’s life, who had previously refused a blood transfusion. I understand that court systems in some jurisdictions have ruled that patients may have a general legal right to receive emergency medical treatment (Pozgar, 2012). In recent years, however, courts in many areas have shown increasing interest in allowing hospitals to turn people away, at least for medical problems. In this case, the factual base was that unless Ms. Fusal received treatmentor she would die. In short, all countries agree on state interests that should be considered when deciding whether or not to order a patient to have a voluntary blood transfusion. The state interest includes protecting the integrity of the medical profession and the preservation of life (Lewis, 2021). As a result, the idea here is to save Ms. Fusal’s life. Therefore, granted the jurisdiction, the hospital must ensure that they inform the patient on the consequences of the blood transfusion process and ensure it gets done diligently to save her life. When the judge determined how urgent and life-threatening the scenario was, he ordered the transfusion to happen.
Reference
Lewis, B. C. (2021). Bioethics and the Law Notes, Cases, and Problems.
Pozgar, D. (2012). Legal Aspects of Health Care Administration, 11th Ed . Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Learning.

For Scenario 3
As the hospital attorney, it is in my best interest to protect every patient, make sure every patient is receiving quality care, and treat as needed. Today I present you, the urgency of Ms. Fusal’s blood transfusion. I can assure you that Ms. Fusal is a competent adult, she is a single-mother who has a 10 year old son depending on her at home. I have brought with me all her medical records, including diagnostic imaging, and lab results. Ms. Fusal has been informed of the advantages of receiving treatment and the fact that there is currently no other treatment that can save her life. Despite Ms. Fusal’s refusal of treatment, our doctors continue to give her the best possible care within the parameters she has set for us. Our doctors and I all come together to day to stress the importance of this transfusion and only hope that Ms. Fusual will one day return home to her son.
Reference:
Pozgar, G. D. (2019). Legal aspects of health care administration (13th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

I need an explanation for this Business question to help me study.

Read the Chapter 12 Mini-Case: A Change at the Top at Procter & Gamble: An Indication of How Much the CEO Matters?Respond to question 2: How Is it a good practice to rehire a former CEO who has retired? Please explain the potential advantages and disadvantages of doing so.My company is Keuring/Dr PepperDiscuss the particulars of the firm that you are researching for your project or other publicly owned firms. Do NOT review the Proctor & Gamble case specifics.A. G. Lafley joined Procter & Gamble (P&G) in 1977 as brand assistant for Joy dishwashing liquid. From this beginning, he worked his way through the firm’s laundry division, becoming highly visible due to a number of successes including the launching of liquid Tide. A string of continuing accomplishments throughout the firm resulted in Lafley’s appointment as P&G’s CEO in June 2000, a post he held until retiring in mid-2009. Bob McDonald, who joined P&G in 1980, was Lafley’s handpicked successor. McDonald took the top position at P&G in July 2009, but resigned under pressure in May 2013. Lafley, revered by many, was asked to come out of retirement and return to P&G as president, CEO, and chair of the board of directors. Lafley said that when contacted to return to P&G, he agreed immediately to do so, committing to remain “as long as needed to improve the company’s performance.” However, speculation is that Lafley likely would not remain beyond three years.What went wrong for McDonald, a long-time P&G employee who seemed to know the firm well and who received Lafley’s support? Not surprisingly, a number of possibilities have been mentioned in response to this question. Some concluded that, under McDonald’s leadership, P&G suffered from “poor execution globally,” an outcome created in part by P&G’s seemingly ineffective responses to aggressive competition in emerging mar- kets. Other apparent problems were a failure to control the firm’s costs and employees’ loss of confidence in McDonald’s leadership. Still others argued that McDonald did not fully understand the effects on U.S. consumers of the recession in place when he took over, and that, during that time period, P&G “was selling BMWs when cash- tight consumers were looking for Kias.” The net result of these types of problems included P&G “losing a step to rivals like Unilever.” In turn, this caused investors to become frustrated by “P&G’s inability to consistently keep up with its rivals’ sales growth and share price gains.”But why bring Lafley back? In a few words, because of his previous success. Among other achievements during his first stint as P&G’s main strategic leader were building up the firm’s beauty business, acquiring Gillette, expanding the firm’s presence in emerging markets, and launching hit products such as Swiffer and Febreze. An overall measure of P&G’s success during Lafley’s initial tenure as CEO is the fact that the firm’s shares increased 63 percent in value while the S&P fell 37 percent in value. Thus, multiple stakeholders, including investors and employees, may believe that Lafley can return the firm to the “glory days” it experienced from 2000 to 2009.Product innovations are a core concern and an area receiving a significant amount of attention. Analysts suggest that P&G needs to move beyond incremental innovations, seeking to again create entirely new product categories as it did with Swiffer and Febreze. This will be challenging, at least in the short run, given recent declines in allocations to the firm’s research and development programs. These reductions have resulted in a product pipeline focused mainly on “reformulating rather than inventing.” Additionally, efforts are underway to continue McDonald’s strong, recent commitments to reduce the firm’s “bloated” cost structure and reenergize the competitive actions it will take in global markets.Restructuring P&G’s multiple brands and products into four sectors, each of which will be headed by a president, is a major change Lafley is initiating. Currently, the firm has two global business divisions—beauty and grooming and household care. Final decisions about the precise compositions of the four sectors were not announced by mid-2013. Speculation, though, was that each sector would be formed “to reflect synergies between various businesses.” For example, one expectation was that paper-based products such as “Bounty paper towels, Charmin toilet paper, Pampers diapers and Always feminine care products” would be combined to form a sector. Moreover, Lafley’s replacement was expected to be selected from among the four presidents who would be chosen to lead the new sectors.