WEEK 3 DISCUSSION 1 COLLEAGUES RESPONSEPlease make sure Minimum 4 full paragraphs for EACH colleague respond.Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ postings that contain a perspective other than yours. Share an insight about what you learned from having read your colleagues’ postings and discuss how and why your colleague’s posting resonated with you professionally and personally. (Note: This may be a great opportunity to help you think about passions you share with your colleagues who could become part of your Walden network.) Offer an example from your experience or observation that validates what your colleague discussed. Offer specific suggestions that will help your colleague build upon his or her perceptions as a leader. Offer further assessment from having read your colleague’s post that could impact a leader’s effectiveness. Share how something your colleague discussed changed the way you consider your own leadership qualities. Your post should be clear, logical, and organized. Posting should address the question or issue, is interesting and pertinent to the course content and purpose of discussion, is original, is appropriate in rigor, and provides context that establishes relevance.

Participate in this week’s essay regarding how change impacts projects. Denote how the changes associated with this week impacted your team project as well as a well-known project and note the outcome in a 350-500 word essay.This week we discuss an expected event and additional work and how that influences your specific team project. Pick a well-known project that went thorough turmoil during the project phases. Denote what happened and if the modifications that were added allowed the project to get back on track or if it caused the project to be unsuccessful. Denote your thoughts as to what could have occurred to make the project more successful or if the project was successful in the end, even more successful.Cite three scholarly references, including at least two peer-reviewed references from university library. Sources must be used to enhance the learning experience. By finding a referenced source, you are enhancing the learning experience by searching for another source of information on the topic. Also, please ensure you are using a source that is peer reviewed to ensure accuracy of information (select peer-reviewed journal articles in the Park Library).Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Read the University of Phoenix Material: Compassion for Samantha Case Study.Consider the following:
SHRM ethical guidelines
Ethical processes for hiring, evaluating, disciplining, and terminating employees
Regulations for equal opportunity and employee rights
Commonly held values such as compassion, courage, integrity, and wisdom that can help people clarify their differences with others, understand their positions, and communicate values more effectively
Disagreements about moral choices in an organization are a natural part of doing business. Appreciate the viewpoints of other parties instead of vilifying them. Anticipate these disagreements by developing strategies for dealing with the most common conflicts you will face in your work.

Your personal strengths, unique voice, core identity and desired self-image.
Potential arguments that others will use to support immoral or unethical behavior
Describe the ethical dilemma presented in the scenario, and explain why it is an ethical dilemma.
Describe the government and industry regulations relevant to this scenario.
Explain why specific elements from SHRM guidelines would apply to this situation.
Describe the ethical way to resolve the issue with Samantha.

I need a script that I will be introducing verbally.
The strong hook and a good ending.
(I am on the affirmative side only)
The topic: The Covid-19 Vaccination decreases deaths.
objective: The objective of the Proposition of Fact debate is to focus your research, writing, and debate skills on an issue that centers around the truth or falsity of a claim.
(You need to be able to find at least four legitimate sources for your side for your debate, so no conspiracy theories or fictional topics.)
Affirmative Introduction (1:00 minute minimum; 1:30 maximum)
Negative Introduction (1:00 minimum; 1:30 maximum)
Affirmative Body (2:30 minimum; 3:00 maximum)
Negative Body (2:30 minimum; 3:00 maximum)
Affirmative Rebuttal (45 sec. minimum; 1:30 maximum)
Negative Rebuttal (45 sec. minimum; 1:30 maximum)
Affirmative Conclusion (30 sec. minimum; 1:00 maximum)
Negative Conclusion (30 sec. minimum; 1:00 maximum)
—
____ Debate packet was turned in on time.
____ Debate packet was organized properly (script, then references).
____ Verbal citations in the script are underlined.
____ The reference list properly adheres to APA formatting guidelines.
____ The script is formatted neatly and is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

Need help with my Writing question – I’m studying for my class.

Competency
Apply duty-based ethical theories to contemporary moral issues.
Instructions
In this research-based assessment, you will be applying a Kantian perspective to a contemporary moral issue. Current contemporary moral issues range from genetic engineering to issues related to the use of torture in wartime. For this assessment you will need to research contemporary moral issues and select one that will be the focus of your paper as you apply the Kantian perspective. Once you select your moral issue, you will need to address the following in a properly formatted research paper. 
Explain what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty.
Describe the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.

Differentiate the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
How do these formulations apply to your selected contemporary moral issue? 
Using the foundation of Kant’s moral theory explain how there is a moral duty for your selected contemporary moral issues. 
Express your view as a maxim.
How feasible is it to universalize your maxim? 
How does your maxim fulfill/satisfy each of these formulations?