Week 2: Database SearchChoose a topic related to health that has meaning to your personal health, interests, and well-being. This may be a disease, such as diabetes, or a healthy fitness activity.Conduct a database search comparing one of the following database directories with Google Scholar.CINAHL and Google ScholarPubMed and Google ScholarExplain how you were able to narrow down the number of article hits you had initially, and present within your post a summary of the credible article you chose as your resource. How do you know your article choice is credible? Which database do you prefer and why?How will using a database search facilitate your:scholarly work;nursing work (evidence-based practice); andpersonal self-development?Student Sample:Hello professor and classmates,The topic that I chose for this week to conduct my database search was Common Running Injuries. As stated in the article “Running is a common form of exercise but predisposes athletes to several running-related injuries. Most running injuries are due to overuse and respond to conservative treatment.”(Fields, 2021)My initial topic was benefits of exercise. But the topics that came up for my database search between PubMed and Google Scholar were too vague which led me to changing my question. The articles differ on common running injuries because The PubMed article I investigated is an article that gave me management and evaluation on common running injuries. Google Scholar showed trends and demographic and evaluations that were studied in common running injuries. Moreover, for my topic common running injuries I found less results from PubMed which gave me 920 results and over 100,00 results on Google Scholar. I narrowed down my search by looking into which articles gave me more analysis and depth into injuries on certain bones, in regards to what I have experienced myself since I run daily. It was easier to navigate on PubMed, I like this database more because the information presented in the article had table and charts with percentages to see the comparison regarding common running Injuries on certain bones that are affected. PubMed’s database information was also very concise and it gave detailed recommendation on running and bones affected. In contrast to the Google Scholar database search the information has less charts and table but analysis and epidemiologic studies mentioned in the articles. On the other hand ,Both PubMed and Google Scholar have the references sited on the article.Furthermore, I knew my database search on PubMed was credible because the website ends in (.org) it has the authors credentials, evidence and the information is recently current. Resources: Fields, K. B. (2021). Running injuries – changing trends and demographics : Current sports medicine reports. Retrieved May 09, 2021, from https://journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/fulltext/2011/09000/running_injuries___changing_trends_and.13.aspx (Links to an external site.)Michael, A. J., & Aaron, M. L. (n.d.). Common Running Injuries: Evaluation and Management. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=common+running+injuries+&filter=simsearch3.fft.doi:https://www-proquest-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/docview/2454235420?accountid=147674

Respond to 2 peers using your own resources

1. Supplemental and floating staff is when a staff member goes to another department to assist with the staffing issue. Proper nurse staffing is important because it ensures “good patient outcomes, safety, and satisfaction” (Bitanga, 2021). Being short staffed in a crucial department such as ER or ICU, can highly affect the recovery process for the patient. As a nurse works in a variety of departments, it gives them “the experience of working with diverse patient population and other specialties, see how other units function and chance to meet and work with other nurses while building knowledge and skills” (Bitanga, 2021). It may be stressful on a nurse to work in a department other than their own, but it gives them the opportunity to become well-rounded in their patient experience and skills.
           Although floating staff can have its advantages, there are many disadvantages as well. Working in a department that is unfamiliar with the nurse can leave them feeling “anxiety, stress, overwhelming, scary, draining, dissatisfaction, disruptive, and feeling of frustration” (Bitanga, 2021) What causes a nurse to have this abundance of feelings is that they do not know what to expect. Nurses do not know everything, so when working outside their specialty, they do not know what to expect.
           I believe the advantages and disadvantages of floating staff would vary depending on specific units. For example, an ICU nurse will be very uncomfortable with a labor and delivery unit but might be comfortable on a medsurg floor. Some departments can intertwine with one another, but others have a different set of rules and priorities. I believe it is up to the leadership of the unit to find floating staff that would not be highly out of their comfort zone. In the end, floating staff will affect a patient’s recovery process, and it is essential that the nurse is fit for the job.
2. Supplemental nurses are temporary staff hired from outside agencies by hospitals and other healthcare facilities. Floating nurses are staff who are assigned different units within the facility that they work for and “float” between units. The main advantage of these types of nurses is that they are a cost-effective means of preventing staff shortages within units (O?Connor & Dugan, 2017). Disadvantages include lacking unit-specific skill competency, anxiety related to working outside of their regular environment, and an unfamiliarity with the unit’s dynamics and protocols, which could all culminate to compromised patient safety (O?Connor & Dugan, 2017).
The aforementioned disadvantages may be especially noticeable in specific units, such as intensive care units. ICUs are characterized by enhanced monitoring, advanced life support, and care for the critically ill or injured (Marshall et al., 2017). If the floating/supplemental nurse is more accustomed to non-intensive care units, they may find that if they were to be assigned to an ICU, the specialized care for the high-acuity patients may be too challenging for them to provide, thus compromising patient safety. This is why ICUs may be particularly challenging for supplemental and floating staff.

This section is extremely malleable in that groups can include as much, or as little detail as
needed to clarify what remains to the reader (e.g. stakeholder). However, this section needs to
elucidate your group’s policy recommendations for responding to the issue or phenomenon you
have researched, and specifically, how. This will be rooted in the data you analyze and present.
In order to complete this section, you will also need to present your results. This means,
analyzing your data according to your proposed Methodologies in Week 4. For many of you, this
is a simple quest (e.g. descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, etc.). Tables, graphs, charts,
etc. will all be presented in this section alongside what has been done to address these
groups/movements and what should be done.
If you need more help in contextualizing all of this jargon, please watch the “Data and Analysis”
mini-lecture in the “Group Project” folder.
Basically, this is a data-driven analysis. Some of you will dedicate your analysis the group or
movement (e.g. growth/decline/etc.) and others will focus on the impact of prior policy decisions
and whether those policies were effective at curbing the terrorism you are examining (and why or
why not). Regardless, you must propose solutions to the group, phenomenon, or issue you
examined. These solutions must be clear, specific, and measurable. If the movement/group
examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented, dissolved, etc.), what should have been
done to address this movement/group more effectively at the time?
The more creative and nuanced this section is, the easier it will be for groups to distinguish
themselves from others. To be successful here, however, will require groups to adequately
research what has been done before to address the phenomenon in question (see Literature
Review submission). If something has been tried and has been a failure, then do not recommend
it as a viable policy recommendation. If something has failed, but research has shown how this
failure can be ameliorated in future policy, then be specific in recommending what can be done
in similar veins. This also means that groups will need to rely on evidence-based practices in
crafting specific policy or program responses to the phenomenon. Hence why you need to rely on
your data to inform your decisions here.
Complex problems often require multidimensional solutions. Please think long and hard about
what you think would actually work and why in terms of addressing the movement, group, or
phenomenon you are studying. The submission in question, at a
minimum, will include the following information:
● What does your data show as to the nature of the problem(s)/group(s) examined? o Over time? o Now? o After certain policies were implemented?
● What needs to be done in terms of policy, program, or practice? o If the movement/group examined is no longer prevalent (i.e. has fragmented,
dissolved, etc.), what should have been done to address this movement/group
more effectively?
â–ª Be specific here. This submission will also include any and all graphs, charts, plots, tables, and figures you create.
It is expected that various forms of visuals be used to display your analyses.

Reply to two classmates in at least 150 words with one more additional quote from the text. Remember to include the full MLA 8 citation at the end of your replies. Aisha response: In Henry David Thoreau’s book, “Civil Disobedience”; Thoreau discusses unjust laws, he states “Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?” from this quotation, one could infer that Thoreau is offering arguments for civil disagreements, such as accepting to obey the laws, or endeavoring till we have succeeded in amending the law, not just amend them, or going against the law and becoming transgressors of unjust laws. Thoreau is asking, would you blindly follow the unjust law? Or would you follow the unjust laws until you could conform to them and better them? Or would you disobey the law until it is fixed and revised? Thoreau believed that if the government required you to obey unjust laws, then you should break the law even if it meant punishment and imprisonment. He encouraged people to use their morals and what they stood for and to go against such unjust laws. He believed no one should be forced “I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my fashion. Let us see who is the strongest” (Thoreau). Thoreau believed strongly against people being blind followers of unjust laws or unjust government and respecting it “It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right” (Thoreau). From all the statements Thoreau has made it is just to think, he firmly believed government only existed to please and conform to the people, and if it didn’t, it shouldn’t be obeyed “The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it” (Thoreau). Jacobs response: Thoreau’s quote, “Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?”, displays his disliking towards the government compelling minorities to obey them. He argues that people should only follow a government that makes laws in an ethical and moral way. He claims that most governments are not practical; “Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient” (Thoreau). He justifies civil disobedience in many ways, one of those moral principles being the need for individual conscience; “It is truly enough said that a corporation has no conscience; but a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscience” (Thoreau). Thoreau’s view on just and unjust laws is based on his argument that not all citizens’ values are represented in the nation’s laws. This leads to Thoreau’s view on democracy in America; “Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man?” (Thoreau). He believes that democracy has its benefits, however, the majority is not always correct.

I need an answer for the text posted below. the answer needs to be 150 words long and include at least 2 references. ThanksAs healthcare evolves the importance of nurses in the continuous improvement and enhancement of their duties and policy is imperative. Nurses are at the frontlines of their positions so they are aware of the issues or positive aspects of the current care that is being delivered. Due to this awareness the nurses can make an impact on change that can address the how, when, and why the certain healthcare services are rendered. To make a difference the RNs and APRNs should participate in the legislative branch and their decision making processes when healthcare is being discussed. When nurses influence the politics that improve the delivery of healthcare, they are ultimately advocating for their patients (My American Nurse, 2016). Nurses historically has little involvement in poly that affects healthcare change but to change this one of the top ways is to belong to a nursing association that is known for their healthcare advocacy such as the American Nurses Association. The American Nurses Association encourages nurses to advocate and help their communities while they receive report from the organization to advance the political agendas to reflect nursing goals (ANA, n.d). With any change there are challenges. Especially challenges with being heard and or taken serious. The nurse joining an organization such as the ANA will help the nurse bring better understanding to policymakers and give them the foundation for education to be presented. Another way for nurses to be seen as essential in policymaking is through street bureaucracy. Street-level bureaucrats are the frontline workers or policy implementers in government agencies that are characterized by regular and direct interaction with citizens, or the recipients of government services; and have the power to exercise a degree of discretion over the services, benefits and sanctions received by those recipients (Alliance, n.d). To advocate in this autonomous position the nurse has to understand laws to be able to implement new approaches to nursing. The challenge to these two approaches for policy making is the lack of knowledge of the many policies that affect healthcare. To combat these issues the nurse needs to find their focus on one specific area and gain the understanding of what can and should change and find a way to influence that change. The best way to gain participation is through advanced education. With education being an essential factor to policy making the more knowledge the nurse possesses the better. Nurses who feel more knowledgeable on certain subjects tend to be more comfortable with promoting and advocating for issues and policies. Legislators are also more readily open to a nurse who is an expertise at the proposed change.American Nurses Association. (n.d). Advocacy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advoc…My American Nurse. (2016).The nursing profession’s potential impact on policy and politics. https://www.myamericannurse.com/nursing-profession…Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. (n.d). Street-level Bureaucracy.https://www.hpsa-africa.org/images/Street_level_bu…