Assess the Draft Training Proposal and peer feedback you received in Week Two, and finalize the topic and objectives for your training program. See attached word doc for topic and objectives. In a 20- to 25-slide PowerPoint presentation, not including the title and references slides:
No more than 5 bullets per slide.
No more than 5 words per bullet.
Full sentence commentary and in-text citations for each slide belong in Speaker Notes section.

Conduct a needs assessment for your proposed training program. This should include both a person and a task analysis.
Develop SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely) training objectives based on the needs assessment and any assumptions you may need to make.
Create an original, detailed training proposal. This should include: 

A title and description of the program.
A discussion of training methods to be used, and a rationale (justification) for using them, based on training theory.
Proposed instructors and the reason for using them.
A tentative training outline.
A tentative list and description of training materials needed.

Develop a plan for evaluation of training effectiveness including both short-term and long-term evaluation where appropriate.

TRELS – Statement of InterestExplain how your participation in the TRELS program will help you achieve your educational and career goals.TRELS – Statement of ObstaclesExplain what obstacles you have faced that have limited your ability to do research, participate in creative endeavors, or do community service projects. How will the TRELS program help to alleviate these obstacles?TRELS – IndependenceTRELS is meant to support your independent project, which should be supervised and mentored by a faculty member, but which should be your own work and responsibility. Please explain how your project reflects your independent work. If you are proposing to work on a larger collaborative project, please explain which piece of this project will be your specific responsibility.TRELS SRP – DeliverablesThe TRELS Summer Research Program requires each student to present the outcomes/findings of their project in the form of an oral presentation at the Summer Research Conference (SRC) in mid-August (week 8 of the 10-week program), as well as a written paper due by the end of August (week 10 of the 10-week program). Please explain your current plan for sharing your project in these formats and how you will plan to meet the timeline.

Please watch the entire speech, and then answer the following questions. When writing your response, please use each question as a section heading and write 1-2 paragraphs in response to each item.

How did Amy Webb “hack” online dating?
Describe your opinion of her approach to online dating. (Do you think her approach was reasonable? Ethical? Smart? Why or why not?)
Communication science researchers often uses similar techniques to the one’s Amy describes in her speech. They analyze information on social media websites and try to use that information, partnered with responses from social media users, to predict outcomes for people’s lives and relationships. They do so with the hopes of learning more about how people relate to one another online and how to make online interactions better. What do you perceive the possible pros and cons of this type of research being from a practical standpoint?
How do you perceive romantic relationships to have changed in light of new technology and media?
Analyze Amy Webb as a public speaker. What does she do well (in terms of delivery, style, rhetorical devices)? In what areas could she improve?

3 (300-word summaries at least) using Prothero “Religion Matters” Summary 1 A famous rabbi once wrote, “Right belief follows right practice.” What do you think this means, and how does it reflect Judaism’s focus on practice? What does it suggest more broadly about the ways that we come to “believe” anything at all? *It is not necessary to refer to Prothero’s text for this one. This one is pure free-thought! Have fun. Summary 2 Again, I want to break from our textbook briefly, because I really want to focus on the fascinating break from Judaism that creates “Christianity” as a universal new religious movement, entirely separate from Judaism. It demonstrated that Jesus, as a wisdom teacher and a wandering preacher, did attract a lot of attention and inspire a movement. But, it was Paul who actually should be understood as the founder of Christianity. Without reference to any particular source (i.e. feel free to speculate), why do YOU think this new religious movement became SO popular despite the opposition of both Jews and the Roman Empire more broadly? Summary 3 With reference to your textbook, what makes Sufis different from other Muslims? Why do you think poetry and dance are so important in the Sufi tradition?

PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES. PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.DIRECTIONS: You can receive up to 2.5 points per argument brief. In an argument brief, students are expected to include the following:Choose a popular debate/argument that is happening nowadaysBanned: abortion, any topic already discussed in the Case Study Project, or a topic we debated on in class.Provide a description of the general debate (the who, what, when, where, why)Identify the resolution (fact, value, or policy)Identify and cite at least one of the strongest arguments made on both sidesConsidering the arguments provided, which side are you on and why?MAXIMUM SUBMISSIONS: (5) FIVERequirements:Minimum 300-600 wordsIndicate where you got the arguments from. At least 2 sources.Clearly organized with the following headings:DESCRIPTION:RESOLUTION:ARGUMENTS (PRO SIDE):ARGUMENTS (CON SIDE):YOUR POSITION:PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.PLEASE DO IT 5 TIMES WITH 5 DIFFERENT DEBATES.